Hi,
On 13/04/2017 07:09, Igor Mironchik wrote:
Hello,
3Dtree has been updated. Now autumn is animated. Removed hand-made
classes of leaf geometry and mesh. Now example uses ready mesh prepared
in Blender. Modified a little constants of the tree. Example looks nice.
This is a benchmark of your v
Hi,
On 13/04/2017 06:15, Ch'Gans wrote:
On 13 April 2017 at 14:38, Ch'Gans wrote:
Hi,
I would like to be able to select at run-time how my entities are
rendered (ideally on a per entity basis).
I would like to have 3 choices:
- 1. wireframe
- 2. shaded
- 3. shaded + wireframe
I had a look at
Den 13 apr. 2017 2:52 fm skrev "Jason H" :
>
>
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 12:05 PM
> > From: "VStevenP via Interest"
> > To: interest@qt-project.org
> > Subject: [Interest] QtQuick import question
> >
> > When importing a QtQuick version, is it best to import the most recent
version,
Hello,
3Dtree has been updated. Now autumn is animated. Removed hand-made
classes of leaf geometry and mesh. Now example uses ready mesh prepared
in Blender. Modified a little constants of the tree. Example looks nice.
This is a benchmark of your video card, because leafs and branches are
sta
From: Interest on
behalf of Dirk Hohndel
>When you ask for Windows please be more precise. Since I just saw your
>question in a related Jira task I know the context here.
There is no support for BTLE on Win32 in Windows 5.9. WInRT for BTLE central
r
On 13 April 2017 at 14:38, Ch'Gans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to select at run-time how my entities are
> rendered (ideally on a per entity basis).
> I would like to have 3 choices:
> - 1. wireframe
> - 2. shaded
> - 3. shaded + wireframe
>
> I had a look at the wire frame QML exampl
Hi,
I would like to be able to select at run-time how my entities are
rendered (ideally on a per entity basis).
I would like to have 3 choices:
- 1. wireframe
- 2. shaded
- 3. shaded + wireframe
I had a look at the wire frame QML example, and translated it to C++.
The code is working. I have simp
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 12:05 PM
> From: "VStevenP via Interest"
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] QtQuick import question
>
> When importing a QtQuick version, is it best to import the most recent
> version, or the minimum version that supports the features (prop
On 12/04/2017 17:05, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 04/12/2017 10:50 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
[Disclaimer: IANAL] On Wed, April 12, 2017 12:43, Roland Hughes wrote:
Only problem with "fetch the file first" is it would be illegal in most
cases.
Your sentence translates to: "It is
On 12/04/2017 16:45, Roland Hughes wrote:
Fine.
You have the right to ACCESS but not COPY which is what someone told you
to do with network manager. Copying images you do not own is a crime.
I did not tell him to copy it with QNAM. He asked how to obtain the
image data in memory before pass
On 04/12/2017 10:50 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
[Disclaimer: IANAL] On Wed, April 12, 2017 12:43, Roland Hughes wrote:
Only problem with "fetch the file first" is it would be illegal in most
cases.
Your sentence translates to: "It is illegal to view any file (image, text
or oth
When importing a QtQuick version, is it best to import the most recent version,
or the minimum version that supports the features (properties, etc.) of the
components being used?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.
Fine.
You have the right to ACCESS but not COPY which is what someone told you
to do with network manager. Copying images you do not own is a crime.
Wasn't trolling, just trying to keep you out of prison. Most every
content publishing company on the Internet has started pursuing these
cases
oops, it seems I misspelled it
it should be QQuickImage
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Jason H wrote:
> This one? https://github.com/KDE/kdeclarative/blob/master/src/qmlcontrols/
> kquickcontrolsaddons/qimageitem.cpp
> It's from KDE.. I'm not using KDE. But it looks to be LGPL.. So I'll check
Hi there,
I thought I had read that this was being considered for 5.9, but I can't find
that post anymore.
Can anyone shed some light on the plans regarding Bluetooth LE?
Thanks
/D
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-proj
This one? https://github.com/KDE/kdeclarative/blob/master/src/qmlcontrols/kquickcontrolsaddons/qimageitem.cpp
It's from KDE.. I'm not using KDE. But it looks to be LGPL.. So I'll check it out. Thanks.
Seems odd though to have the Q Prefix...
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:38 AM
From
Please stop trolling my thread.
1. You don't know what images my app will be accessing, or my rights and permissions to them
2. The fact that an image is posted openly it prima facia evidence that I have permission to access it, given there are access control measures i.e. HTTP 4xx codes, robots.
The fundamental principal behind copyright law will never change.
The moment a work of any kind is created the creator holds the
copyright. Only the holder of the copyright can grant use of the work.
Only the media and length of copyright changes. Currently, in America
that is life of creator
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Roland Hughes
wrote:
> Google wantonly engages in the world's largest copyright infringement
> enterprise on the planet.
Copyright law was different one hundred years ago and will be different one
hundred years ago from now. Usages changes, and law changes (gene
Am I right that this is what I'm looking for?
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtqml-tutorials-extending-qml-example.html
On 4/12/2017 4:09 PM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote:
Hello,
I know about a possibility to customize existing controls.
(http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtquickcontrols2-customize.html)
But what if
Hello,
I know about a possibility to customize existing controls.
(http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtquickcontrols2-customize.html)
But what if I would like to create completely new one? Including ability
to draw it by myself.
Is it possible with Quick Controls2?
If yes, please give me a link to the d
Google wantonly engages in the world's largest copyright infringement
enterprise on the planet. Google illegally scanned copyrighted material
without consent of the copyright owner and placed that content for free
on Google Books so they could sell advertising around it. I was a victim
of that
Hi,
[Disclaimer: IANAL]
On Wed, April 12, 2017 12:43, Roland Hughes wrote:
> Only problem with "fetch the file first" is it would be illegal in most
> cases.
Your sentence translates to: "It is illegal to view any file (image, text
or otherwise) that originates on the web."
It is perfectly lega
so, people have to learn how to see images w/o copying them from remote :)
back to topic:
I think topicstarter can use QImageItem as a base class or as a reference
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
> Only problem with "fetch the file first" is it would be illegal in most
>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
> it is illegal to copy the image without the express written consent of the
> copyright holder.
>
>
Good to know that most image thumbnails hosted on google's server are
illegal.
___
Interest maili
Only problem with "fetch the file first" is it would be illegal in most
cases.
Each and every image on the Internet has a copyright. While it is legal
to _reference_ an image in any HTML page by linking back to the site
which hosts the image, it is illegal to copy the image without the
expres
Hi,
could be a number of things but I'd check your normal vectors are correct. Do
you really need solid geometry here or would a two sided quad be enough? You
could create a leaf shape in a modeling tool like blender and export to
obj/fbx files. Or you could use the built in PlaneMesh and get t
Hi,
My program run on Mac OS X and Android. I use an HTML model and a CSS
stylesheet to create a document with QTextCursor.
In my stylesheet I use this line :
td {
font: 12px "Comic Sans MS";
}
With Mac OS X, I don’t have problem with font family (i.e : Comic sans MS,
Verdana, …). But wi
Hello,
Just for comparing look at the picture where leafs is just a plain
rendered on one side...Tree with plain leafs
As for me then plain leafs looks better than with both-sided geometry...
Why is it so?
12.04.2017 10:40, Igor Mironchik пишет:
Hi,
I defined geometry of the leaf as two
Hi,
I defined geometry of the leaf as two plains with very small thickness.
Top has 8 faces, bottom - 8, lefts side 8 and right side 8. Total 9*2
vertices. Top vertices has Z = 0.0, bottom Z = -0.01. But when leaf is
rendered it looks a little convex.
Is it normal, or am I missed something?
30 matches
Mail list logo
