Re: [Interest] QTableWidget add chart

2013-03-22 Thread Alex Malyushytskyy
Write, find free or buy widget you need to insert, ( google it. for example http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php?content=132560) then read QTableWidget documentation about setCellWidget ( int row, int column, QWidget * widget ) Alex On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, pengliang(彭亮) wrote: > Hi a

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 23.53.51, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Maybe the first good reason to switch to Qt5 for my particular needs, > damn... I managed to work around this by starting two QTcpServers. However, > this may not work on all systems according to this (old) post : > ht

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 23.34.51, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > I got it... In fact, I just learned that it's not possible to listen > on both IPv4 and IPv6 with the same socket, and that QHostAddress::Any > means only IPv4 That's incorrect. QHostAddress::Any listens on both addre

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 18.58.50, K. Frank wrote: > But it's interesting that nobody really put forth any functional benefits > of Qt 5 in the widget / desktop space. There hasn't been any new work done on the widgets, besides general bugfixing. They've been in Done state for going on

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Zenon Szalata
I don't think that qwt 6.1 requires QT 5. I have been using it with QT 4.8 for a while now. Zen On 03/22/13 15:58, K. Frank wrote: > Hello All! > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:41 PM, K. Frank wrote: >> Hello List! >> >> What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In >> partic

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread K. Frank
Hello All! On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:41 PM, K. Frank wrote: > Hello List! > > What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In > particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? > ... Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I think I will move to Qt 5 when I upgrade. But it

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
Thanks for the info! Maybe the first good reason to switch to Qt5 for my particular needs, damn... I managed to work around this by starting two QTcpServers. However, this may not work on all systems according to this (old) post : http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/2008-11/thread00055-0.html

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 22 March 2013 23:34, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > I got it... In fact, I just learned that it's not possible to listen > on both IPv4 and IPv6 with the same socket, and that QHostAddress::Any > means only IPv4 Note that this has changed in Qt 5. "Any" now really means both IPv4 and IPv6

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
I got it... In fact, I just learned that it's not possible to listen on both IPv4 and IPv6 with the same socket, and that QHostAddress::Any means only IPv4 Qt automatically uses the IPv6 when the DNS lookup returns both IPv4 and IPv6, which caused the issue. How is it done usually in server appli

Re: [Interest] Program runs only on four core processors.... sometimes.

2013-03-22 Thread Guido Seifert
> I'd just like to add the fact that I drove one station too far with > the train this morning, because I was busy replying to your question. > Luckily I live in Switzerland where everything is pretty small and > tiny, such as the distances between train stations, so I could walk > back ;) Sorry

Re: [Interest] Program runs only on four core processors.... sometimes.

2013-03-22 Thread Guido Seifert
Hi, me again. :-) Not sure about priority inversion. When I check the network with netstat -an or the Resource Monitor the program seems to run. The userinterface, which connects also via tcp to the main program does not seem to come through. When I ask uncle Wikipedia, it looks to me more like

Re: [Interest] QAudioDecoder: defaultServiceProvider::requestService(): no service found for - "org.qt-project.qt.audiodecode"

2013-03-22 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 22.03.13 20:01, schrieb Till Oliver Knoll: > ... > I also get lots of error messages upon application startup, such as > > objc[747]: Class TransparentQTMovieView is implemented in both > /Users/tknoll/Qt5.0.1/5.0.1/clang_64/plugins/mediaservice/libqqt7engine.dylib > and > /Users/tknoll/Qt5.0.1

Re: [Interest] QAudioDecoder: defaultServiceProvider::requestService(): no service found for - "org.qt-project.qt.audiodecode"

2013-03-22 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 22.03.13 20:01, schrieb Till Oliver Knoll: > Hi, > ... > defaultServiceProvider::requestService(): no service found for - > "org.qt-project.qt.audiodecode" > > Also the qDebug statement prints out: > > Error: The QAudioDecoder object does not have a valid service By the way: the only rela

[Interest] QAudioDecoder: defaultServiceProvider::requestService(): no service found for - "org.qt-project.qt.audiodecode"

2013-03-22 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Hi, I am trying to learn OpenAL. For that I need to read simple *.wav files and thought the QAudioDecoder (Qt 5.0.1 - OS X 10.8.2) would be a perfect fit. I have: m_audioDecoder = new QAudioDecoder; qDebug("Error: %s", qPrintable(m_audioDecoder->errorString())); connect(m_audioDecoder, SIG

[Interest] Qt3D, Framebuffer and MultiSampling

2013-03-22 Thread Federico J . Fernández
All, I'm doing some experiments with GLSL shaders these days. For some of them, I need to first render to a FBO, and then use that information to process the final image. The main surface used is multisampled, which implies, according to the documentation, that the FBO will not render to a texture

Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 11.39.16, K. Frank wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > On 03/21/2013 11:49 PM, K. Frank wrote: > >> I am considering upgrading to Qt 5 (from Qt 4), but I also use qwt, and I > >> am wondering whether I should expect any significant

Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-22 Thread K. Frank
Hi Uwe! Thank you for the detailed reply. On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > On 03/21/2013 11:49 PM, K. Frank wrote: > >> I am considering upgrading to Qt 5 (from Qt 4), but I also use qwt, and I am >> wondering whether I should expect any significant issues doing so. > > On

Re: [Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 14.57.23, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm working on a networked application, intended for use on local area > networks. So far it works fine using IPV4 addresses for connecting. > > I recently tried passing a host name instead of IP address

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 10.29.21, Josiah Bryan wrote: > The biggest reason *not *to upgrade to Qt 5 (for me, anyway) is that Qt 5 > SDK won't install on CentOS 5.5 (my primary development workstation - 3 > monitors, 12 GB RAM, etc) and CentOS 5.5 isn't exactly an old distro. > Here's th

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Adam Light
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:41 PM, K. Frank wrote: > Hello List! > > What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In > particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? > My company is in the process of porting our large and complicated desktop application, which currently s

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Josiah Bryan
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Josiah Bryan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, K. Frank wrote: > >> >> Thanks. Although sometimes I feel that I'm already having as >> much "fun" programming as I can stand. >> >> > The biggest reason *not *to upgrade to Qt 5 (for me, anyway) is that Qt

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Josiah Bryan
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, K. Frank wrote: > > Thanks. Although sometimes I feel that I'm already having as > much "fun" programming as I can stand. > > The biggest reason *not *to upgrade to Qt 5 (for me, anyway) is that Qt 5 SDK won't install on CentOS 5.5 (my primary development worksta

[Interest] IPV6 not working

2013-03-22 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
Dear all, I'm working on a networked application, intended for use on local area networks. So far it works fine using IPV4 addresses for connecting. I recently tried passing a host name instead of IP address to connectToHost(), this failed. After more investigation, the lookup gives an IPV6 addre

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread K. Frank
Hello Alejandro! Thank you for the encouragement. On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Alejandro Exojo wrote: > 2013/3/21 K. Frank : >> What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In >> particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? > ... > The reasons to port, are too comp

Re: [Interest] [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling Qt (4 or 5) with "-std=c++11"

2013-03-22 Thread K. Frank
Hello Ruben! On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2013/3/22 JonY >> >> On 3/22/2013 11:26, K. Frank wrote: >> > >> >> If you're interested in a binary compatibility topic that might affect >> >> you -- >> >> and since you so kindly brought the mingw community in -- be carefu

Re: [Interest] Qt3D Qt5 Angle

2013-03-22 Thread Tomasz Siekierda
On 21 March 2013 21:59, qtnext wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any progress about Qt3D QT5/Angle Lib support ? I do'nt understand > what is not working : qt3D is from scratch build to use Opengl ES, so it > should works with angle ? Qt3D is now being rewritten by Sean and friends (KDAB). it will hit th

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Frank Hemer
On Thursday 21 March 2013 16:41:19 K. Frank wrote: > Hello List! > > What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In > particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? My particular results of a 'porting test' for a desktop&mobil app (~400k lines of code) were quite some

[Interest] jpeg

2013-03-22 Thread tang ke
hello, everybody Now I found a problem with JPEG, when I use the QPixmap(X.JPEG),but get width and height is 0, and I read the JPEG file, the headers is FF D8 FF E1,but the QPixmap is read the FF D8 FF E0 is ok. how can i solve this problem. Thanks very much -- 应用部 唐科 TEL : 0512-52308661

Re: [Interest] gstreamer is not enabled in Qt5

2013-03-22 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy < ramakanthreddy_kesire...@mahindrasatyam.com> wrote: > Any pointers for the below issue... > am facing the below issue on Nvidia tegra3 board. > It's possible that the Qt multimedia implementation is picking up the s/w decoder for decodin

Re: [Interest] gstreamer is not enabled in Qt5

2013-03-22 Thread Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy
Any pointers for the below issue... am facing the below issue on Nvidia tegra3 board. Br, Ramakanth From: Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:18 PM To: Thiago Macieira; interest@qt-project.org Subject: RE: [Interest] gstreamer is not

Re: [Interest] [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling Qt (4 or 5) with "-std=c++11"

2013-03-22 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
I did test it in my app, with no improvement, but I may have to recompile Qt as well. I will test with the file you posted. Thanks, Etienne 2013/3/22 Jonathan Liu : > Hi Etienne, > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898 for GCC bug report. It > occurs with SJLJ exception handlin

Re: [Interest] [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling Qt (4 or 5) with "-std=c++11"

2013-03-22 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
Actually, I suspect the compiler, since profiling with very sleepy is also lacking caller information. Or both gdb and very sleepy are unable to get the caller information from the executable produced by mingw-w64. Could this be a SJLJ vs DWARF issue? My knowledge about debugging information this i

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
2013/3/22 Pritam Ghanghas : > Hi > > I would also like to know the status of Qt5 with regard to cross flatform > desktop application. > In particular I keep seeing posts on the mailing list that talk about > animations and openGL Drivers. You probably refer to QtQuick2 and the "new paradigm" of

Re: [Interest] [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling Qt (4 or 5) with "-std=c++11"

2013-03-22 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > [..] > By the way, since you are using mingw-w64, can you debug properly > applications in QtCreator? When I debug programs, the call stack is empty, > while I still can see locals, and when I step out a function, the debugger > often > crashes. I have no such proble

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Alejandro Exojo
2013/3/21 K. Frank : > What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In > particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? The only compelling reason to not port to Qt5 that I can find is: "because my app is a fire and forget thing". The reasons to port, are too compelling:

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 22/03/13 10:05, Pritam Ghanghas wrote: > Hi > > I would also like to know the status of Qt5 with regard to cross flatform > desktop application. > In particular I keep seeing posts on the mailing list that talk about > animations and openGL Drivers. > > Here is my main concern, can we do nativ

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/03/13 22:41, K. Frank wrote: > What would be the pros and cons of upgrading from Qt 4 to Qt 5? In > particular, are there any good reasons not to do so? Here, I can't switch to Qt 5 yet, since that results in my applications looking non-native on KDE (since KDE is based on Qt 4.) This is

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-22 Thread Pritam Ghanghas
Hi I would also like to know the status of Qt5 with regard to cross flatform desktop application. In particular I keep seeing posts on the mailing list that talk about animations and openGL Drivers. Here is my main concern, can we do native looking cross platform applications with Qt5 that do