Hi,
On 02/21/2012 08:47 PM, Jason H wrote:
After a long dearth of no webservers, it seems that Qt has several.
I've tried libQxt, but can't get it to work.
I've looked at QHttpServer (based on a C parser and has some Q* issues)
Nothing quite suits my fancy. Does anyone know if there is a fully
> Plus soap in itself is overkill. I just want something to do the HTTP
> parsing, and handle the transport (various encodings like fixed or chunked,
> etc). Via some means, I should be able to map a URL to a QObject or
> QObject's slot.
Do you want to handle the HTTP headers in some special way?
Have you looked at QtWebApp (http://stefanfrings.de/qtwebapp/index-en.html).
On Feb 21, 2012 11:47 PM, "Jason H" wrote:
> After a long dearth of no webservers, it seems that Qt has several.
> I've tried libQxt, but can't get it to work.
> I've looked at QHttpServer (based on a C parser and has so
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 15.07.04, 1+1=2 wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:09 AM, André Pönitz
>
> wrote:
> > Something here is complicated by your local setup.
> > None of the environment variables should be needed.
> >
> > ./configure ... [perhaps with -prefix `pwd` to avoid the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:09 AM, André Pönitz
wrote:
> Something here is complicated by your local setup.
> None of the environment variables should be needed.
>
> ./configure ... [perhaps with -prefix `pwd` to avoid the 'make install']
-developer-build can be used to avoid 'make install' too.
Hi Thiago,
I am replying to this since I have some new information.
I started all over, removed all environment variables that might have anything
to do with QT. Unpacked both qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0.tar.gz and
qt-creator-2.4.1-src.tar.gz and built both successfully.
Designer is worki
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 22.53.08, Harri Pasanen wrote:
> As Thiago mentioned, one way to sidestep the
> need for #ifdef is to have branch in version control
> for each version.
>
> Not all version control software is created equal in this respect though.
> Branching in git is very g
As Thiago mentioned, one way to sidestep the
need for #ifdef is to have branch in version control
for each version.
Not all version control software is created equal in this respect though.
Branching in git is very good, svn less so.
Personally I have branches for meego, symbian, android,
+ adsup
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 11.57.19, Erwin Coumans wrote:
> Are you saying there is a way to release software using Qt under the LGPL
> license in the App Store, without infringing?
I have no clue. I've never read the App Store's licensing to see if there are
restrictions. And even if
Thanks, but Qt's SOAP support is abhorrent. Down that path there be dragons. I
don't want to try to implement a gSoap server and deal with Qt's outdated SOAP.
Plus soap in itself is overkill. I just want something to do the HTTP parsing,
and handle the transport (various encodings like fixed or
See gSoap
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~engelen/soap.html
Marcelo E. Geyer
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:47:34 -0800
From: scorp...@yahoo.com
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Best Qt Webserver?
After a long dearth of no webservers, it seems that Qt has several.
I've tried libQxt, but can't
I think you guessed it.
Apple's store isn't about software rights, it is about profit.
You can also only make apps for Android and give Apple's store the middle
finger.
From: Erwin Coumans
To: Jason H
Cc: "interest@qt-project.org"
Sent: Tuesday, Februa
(I didn't receive an email, so it is not clear how to reply, other than
copy and pasting from the list)
Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Or is there anything that protects Qt users (who want to distribute
their
>> software through the Apple App Store) from such infringement complain?
>Don't infringe.
H
After a long dearth of no webservers, it seems that Qt has several.
I've tried libQxt, but can't get it to work.
I've looked at QHttpServer (based on a C parser and has some Q* issues)
Nothing quite suits my fancy. Does anyone know if there is a fully C++ Qt
webserver that works?
__
Right, a commercial Qt license or using Cydia instead sound reasonable.
The answer(s) in the original thread (
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt-interest/2011-September/035667.html)
didn't seem to address the issues between (L)GPL license and Apple App
Store properly.
Thanks!
Erwin
On 21 F
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 11.05.13, Erwin Coumans wrote:
> Do we just need to trust the Qt developers they won't do this?
You can't do that. With the Qt Project, "Qt developers" means every single
person who has contributed code to Qt. That's not just one company, but a lot
of indivi
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 20:04:39 André Pönitz wrote:
> ./configure ... [perhaps with -prefix `pwd` to avoid the 'make install']
That's actually a great idea (-prefix `pwd`)... I wonder why I've never had
that idea myself :)? Thanks, André, for this useful tip!
Cheers, René
___
Get a commercial license?
Or have a developer friend side-load it for you. Thanks to Apple's DRM we'll
see install clubs and piracy take off again. Or use Cydia.
From: Erwin Coumans
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:05 PM
Subjec
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:38:28PM -0800, Szalata, Zenon M. wrote:
> Here is my directory structure:
>
> /opt/qt/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0
> /opt/qt/qt-4.8.0
> /opt/qt/qt-creator-2.4.1-src
> /opt/qt/qtc-2.4.1
>
> I have unpacked qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0 into the first directory
I have some concerns regarding the LGPL license, statically linked in an
application distributed through the Apple App Store.
This was previously discussed here, but it ignore the a part of the LGPL
license about not imposing further restrictions:
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt-interest/201
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:53:52AM +0100, Jesus Fernandez wrote:
>
> For building Qt Creator I use 2 scripts:
> bin> cat buildQt
> #!/bin/sh
> export
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/users/fernajes/paks/dbus/dbus-1.4.16/deploy/lib:/local/
> paks/gcc-4.6.0/deploy/lib:/local/paks/gmp\-4.3.2/deploy/lib:/local/pa
Thanks Thiago,
> -Original Message-
> From: interest-bounces+zms=slac.stanford@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+zms=slac.stanford@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:27 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Intere
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 22.16.09, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 21.02.2012, 22:09, "Thiago Macieira" :
> > On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 18.06.37, qtnext wrote:
> >> it's sure that lot of people will wait for a release version of 5.0, or
> >> 5.1, if there is no way to use
21.02.2012, 22:09, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 18.06.37, qtnext wrote:
>
>> it's sure that lot of people will wait for a release version of 5.0, or
>> 5.1, if there is no way to use the same source code with #ifdef ...
>> Providing the way to test Qt5 before,
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 18.06.37, qtnext wrote:
> it's sure that lot of people will wait for a release version of 5.0, or
> 5.1, if there is no way to use the same source code with #ifdef ...
> Providing the way to test Qt5 before, will allow more feedback from
> users ... and a str
On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 16.55.02, henry.haveri...@nokia.com
wrote:
> Another common case for #ifdefs is configuration management in
> cross-platform projects.
> It's not always possible to port a project to a new platform and never
> look back. :-)
That's not how you're supposed to
Don't forget in OOP, you can always provide an interface class with virtual
functions, then use the build environment to select the proper implementation
for inclusion. But this approach is limited, especially when you're trying to
handle version differences in the toolkit.
I myself prefer to
Hi Szalata,
First, you can run “qmake -v” or "which qmake" to find which version
was used when you call the qmake.
If wrong version was called, you can simply using
"/opt/qt/qt-4.8.0/bin/qmake" when you needed qmake.
If you still come with problem, given the ERROR message.
Regards,
Debao
On M
it's sure that lot of people will wait for a release version of 5.0, or
5.1, if there is no way to use the same source code with #ifdef ...
Providing the way to test Qt5 before, will allow more feedback from
users ... and a stronger release ! just my two cents !
Le 21/02/2012 17:55, henry.have
Thanks a lot, Thales.
Regards
--
Héctor A. Rompato Carricart
Buenos Aires - Argentina
15 6652 7388
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
On 2/20/12 10:47 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>> > It's also possible to have different .qml files having slightly
>>different
>> > imports. You just can't mix major versions, because the backend
>>library is
>> > completely different.
>>
>> I would also assume that it's necessary to have s
It looks to me that in the demo
QtSDK/Examples/4.7/declarative/demos/webbrowser
the WebView does not scroll to anchors in the document.
I don't see any obvious way to enable that either.
Is it possible?
Thanks,
Harri
___
Interest mailing list
Interes
On 02/21/12 18:45, aurindam.j...@nokia.com wrote:
> In Qt5 dir
> git pull
> git submodule init qtjsbackend
> git submodule update qtjsbackend
>
> cd qtjsbackend qmake make
Thanks for confirming that. The mistake I was making was not having these
shell variables set before trying the above...
exp
Hello,
I have a RHEL5 workstation at work.
For building Qt Creator I use 2 scripts:
bin> cat buildQt
#!/bin/sh
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/users/fernajes/paks/dbus/dbus-1.4.16/deploy/lib:/local/paks/gcc-4.6.0/deploy/lib:/local/paks/gmp\-4.3.2/deploy/lib:/local/paks/mpc-0.8.1/deploy/lib:/local/paks/mp
In Qt5 dir
git pull
git submodule init qtjsbackend
git submodule update qtjsbackend
cd qtjsbackend qmake make
~Auri
From: interest-bounces+aurindam.jana=nokia@qt-project.org
[interest-bounces+aurindam.jana=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext Mark
Constable [ma...@re
On segunda-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2012 21.38.28, Szalata, Zenon M. wrote:
> I am working at a Laboratory where RedHat Enterprise Linux 5 or 6 are the
> only Unix OS used on desktop computers. Presently, installing qt 4.8 from
> SDK package fails. So I am trying to install from sources. I have
36 matches
Mail list logo
