On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 22.16.09, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 21.02.2012, 22:09, "Thiago Macieira" <thi...@kde.org>:
> > On terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 18.06.37, qtnext wrote:
> >> it's sure that lot of people will wait for a release version of 5.0, or
> >> 5.1, if there is no way to use the same source code with #ifdef ...
> >> Providing the way to test Qt5 before, will allow more feedback from
> >> users ... and a stronger release ! just my two cents !
> >
> > There's nothing we can do. The language simply doesn't support it.
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to enable simple version comparison like e.g.
>
> if (QtQuick.Version < 2) {
> // some code
> } else {
> // other code
> }
>
> ?
That's already possible. But it doesn't help in any way because you can't have
an import statement in "some code" there.
You HAVE to write
import QtQuick 1.1
or
import QtQuick 2.0
without conditionals.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
