Is there anything obviously with the following sieve script? Its not
filtering, its all still being dumped to the mailbox :(
-
require "discard";
if header :contains "Subject" "Delivery failure" {
discard;
} elsif header :contains "Subject" "Postmaster notify: see transcript fo
I need some help/recommendations ... I'm setting up a server for a client
that I want the 'owner' to be able to easily add a new mailbox (or
remove) without much knowledge of the system.
Now, I know that the account doesn't have to be added to the system passwd
file, so, I'm guessing that I'll
Just thought about it ... I could setup an openldap server for
authentication too, couldn't I? and there is a way of setting up cyrus
such that any new mail coming in with auto-create the mailbox, assuming
its a valid user via ldap?
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
-0500 (EST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost)
by thelab.hub.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9TNVdS14740
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:31:39 -0400 (AST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
X-Authentication-Warning: thelab
FreeBSD has a nifty "feature" that allows you to relatively easily create
a jail environment ... pretty much a virtual machine in a machine ...
I'm working with this to create a virtual mail server, where each domain
has its own virtual machine to work inside of ... theory looks really
great, in
9 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> FreeBSD has a nifty "feature" that allows you to relatively easily create
> a jail environment ... pretty much a virtual machine in a machine ...
>
> I'm working with this to create a virtual mail server, where each domain
&g
Trying to setup a forward that forwards all email from a user to another
user ... rule we are trying is:
IF Field(s): 'From' matches '*'
THEN Redirect To '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
seems logical to me, but doesn't appear to work ..
should it, or should I be doing this a different way?
thanks
Marc
How would one do a redirect *and* a keep?
Basically, we want to do the equivalent of:
\user,user@domain
first thought was, by Vince, was:
if true {
keep;
redirect "user@domain";
}
gave errors ...
how about something like:
if true {
keep && redirect "user@domain";
}
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter M. Jansson writes, regarding e-mail forwarding:
> >
> >Sendmail is really good at this -- enable the USERDB feature, and create
> >an entry that maps the destination to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". It's a lot
> >lighter weight on the server to allow se
anyone have a good doc on how to setup LDAP? So far, what I've been able
to find, has had my run scared of using LDAP :(
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Alain Turbide wrote:
> This is perl cgi script (very alpha) that is used to create and maintain
> user accounts on
> an LDAP server as well as creating/d
l.com/tools.html
>
>
> Alain
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Hermit Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Alain Turbide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 3:03 PM
> Subj
t use it for passwords as
> well. Everything done in one place.
> I haven't had a chance to look into it yet, but will see what I can come up
> with.
>
> Alain
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Hermit Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "
ov 2000, Amos Gouaux wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:33:59 -0400 (AST),
> >>>>> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (thh) writes:
>
> thh> For me, I'm running several 'virtual machines' on one machine, so that
> thh&
can someone explain to me what would cause a 'deliver: didn't exec?!?'
error as below? I'm getting it reasonably consistently on one of my
servers ... load is <1, only 315 processes running ... maxproc on the
machine is 2068 ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC
Morning all ...
doing further investigation on this, and if I remove the sieve
script (a simple redirect "remote user";), the error messages goes away
and the message is delivered to the mailbox ...
does that make any sense to anyone? I can't seem to find any
other error messag
Okay, found docs on setting up Sendmail to use SASL, and got it setup
... when I connect, maillog reports:
error: safesasl(/usr/local/etc/sasldb) failed: Group readable file
on a file with permissions of:
-rw-r- 1 root wheel 24576 Nov 22 23:55/usr/local/etc/sasldb
so, rem
unfortunately, in this case, its FreeBSD, and we don't have acl's yet :(
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > error: safesasl(/usr/local/etc/sasldb) failed: Group readable file
>
> If this is on Solaris, the best solution is to make sendmail happy
> by making root the owner
Why would this happen?
hub# sendmail -qRhub.org -v
Running /var/spool/mqueue/q18/eB6N0FY76931 (sequence 1 of 1)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Connecting to cyrus...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @
perfect, thanks ... this time, it was quota, but any suggestions as to
what options would be useful for testing using deliver?
thanks ...
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Why would this happen?
> >
> &g
pool/imap/s/user/scrappy/
total 18
-rw--- 1 cyrus mail 16384 Dec 7 21:52 cyrus.cache
-rw--- 1 cyrus mail 56 Dec 7 21:40 cyrus.index
-rw--- 1 cyrus mail153 Oct 29 17:03 cyrus.header
so, where do I try to debug this next? :(
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Tom Samplonius wrote:
e
"largish" ones that are not being put through ...
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> okay, this has got me puzzled ... first time, easy ... exceeded quota ...
>
> this one has me stumped, and reading the deliver man page provides little
> insight as to possi
mailbox is empty ... I can't find any way of doing debugging on this
... loadavg on the machine is pretty much zero ... disk space is >3gig
free ... sendmail is 8.11 ... cyrus imapd is 2.0.7 ... there are no quotas
set for the account(s) ...
logs show nothing ... suggestions on what I need to do
looking further at my problem, I'm wonderin gif maybe its a size thing:
total 125020
-rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus177508 Dec 10 20:32 9550.
-rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus 28696 Dec 10 20:32 cyrus.index
-rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus 47595796 Dec 10 20:32 cyrus.cache
-rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus
In order to get around it, I'm using FreeBSDs jail(8) facility to create
virtual machines ... I imagine you could do something similar with FreeVSD
for Linux as well ... ?
On 10 Dec 2000, Amos Gouaux wrote:
> A while ago there was some ideas kicking around regarding supporting
> different virtu
aliasing/forwarding loop ...
can someone tell me if I've screwed up somethign with me .mc file that is
causing the problems that I've been reporting? Its as follows:
=
# divert(-1)
#
# (C) Copyright 2000 by Carnegie Mellon University
#
# This sample mc file is for a sit
%cat 70559 | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver -m scrappy -lD
cat: 70559: No such file or directory
connect failed: No such file or directory
421 4.3.0 deliver: connect failed
%cat 70559. | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver -m scrappy -lD
connect failed: No such file or directory
421 4.3.0 deliver: connect failed
%cat
reading through whatever I can find, I'm starting to wonder if there is a
bug in lmtp that I'm taxing :( using 'sendmail -qRscrappy -v' to force
delivery, the first message appears to try to go through and then lmtpd
dies:
mail1# sendmail -qRscrappy -v^M
Running /var/spool/mqueue/q00/eBBLcm177
Okay, added headers from a different message, changed the Message-ID to
bypass the duplicate delivery suppression ... delivered great ...
what is the chance that the problem is in lmtpd itself? is there a way of
debugging that from the command line? Maybe move it to inetd, if
possible, instead
oh good, I thought it was just me going mad ...
does anything in my .mc file jump out at anyone knowing sendmail more then
I as to what is misconfigured though? Checking things on another server
where I have Cyrus 2.0.7 installed and sendmail 8.11.0, using expn, I can
generate the same error, s
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Michael Yount wrote:
> Marc,
>
> I just tried eliminating the following rule from a test sendmail.cf
> on mail.postgresql.org, and it appears to have solved the problem.
> I'm not sure why this rule would create a rewriting loop.
>
> Michael
>
> :}
> :}LOCAL_RULESETS
>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Nadeem Hasan wrote:
> "Scot W. Hetzel" wrote:
> >
> >
> > LMTP will send the message only once to cyrus and allow cyrus to deliver the
> > message internally to the list of recipients provided during the LMTP
> > exchange with sendmail. One nice feature that this provides t
Why doesn't:
elsif allof (address :contains ["From","from"] "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") {
fileinto "INBOX.majordomo_bounce";
}
file these messages with headers of:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:33:12 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bounce detected (list pgsql-gener
Morning all ...
I just installed smlacapd, to see what its all about, but I
haven't got a clue where to go from here ...
I'm using Eudora to test things with, but can only find a
'Retrieve From' section, but how does one upload settings?
Any tutorial on this I can look
Anyone have a good rule or two that at least does a decent filtering of
what it thinks is spam to a seperate folder? I'm nervous of just
wholeheartedly rejecting, cause my lucky one of them will be a real email,
but something generic redirecting to a seperate mailbox would be cool ...
Marc G. F
grab'd latest CVS and all is well again ... thanks :)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> This is a result of the file descriptor problem we were having; I
> posted a patch several days ago. Let me know if you can't find it.
>
> Larry
>
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:23:31 -0500
Okay, I'm CC'ng in the cyrus imapd developers, as I really haven't got a
clue *grin* hopefully they will be better able to answer this ...
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On 14-Feb-01 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > We're still getting what looks l
using 2.0.11 on my server, with db3.2.9, everything *appears* to be
working okay, except for these messages in my syslog ...
Mar 2 11:12:22 mobile lmtpd[58864]: duplicate_mark: closing
/var/spool/imap/deliverdb/deliver-s.db: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to
complete
I've tried removi
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Phil Ellett wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been struggling for several weeks now to make any progress at all in getting
>Cyrus IMAP running on my system. I had used Cyrus 2.07, 2.09 2.0.11and 2.0.12 and
>still have not succeed in getting a normal banner response from port 110 or
Right now, we're using procmail in order to help a user filter mail ...
basically, if it comes in with a To address of X, file it to a file, else
file it into his imap mailbox ...
Is there some way of doing similar with sieve *or* at least having that
mail message pipe'd through a program?
than
Trying to convince a group that Cyrus is more secure, but my arguments are
about as lame as can be :(
Does anyone have a URL that I can use in my args, that compares them
better?
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ h
Does anyone know of any tools available that will allow someone to do
"distributed" or "replicated" mail servers?
I have a client that is desiring to have, say, 3 boxes setup in different
locations, where the mail on each stays "in sync" ... if one goes down,
when it comes back up again, it will
/usr/bin/perl -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503
/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap
/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap IMAP.xs >xstmp.c && mv
xstmp.c IMAP.c
cc -c -I../../lib -DVERSION=\"1.00\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.00\" -DPI
first is before upgrading, second is after upgrading ...
mail1# ps aux | grep cyrus
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
cyrus 67275 0.0 0.1 2444 1180 p3 IJ8:28AM 0:00.66 /usr/cyrus/bin/master
cyrus 69430 0.0 0.2 6156 1844 p3 IJ8:45AM 0:00
Have a user that is consistently unable to use Outlook when connecting to
a v2.x server (currently at cyrus-imapd out of cvs) ... she's running:
Microsoft Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711)
And the error that is being generated, if it helps anyone, is:
OUTLOOK caused an invalid page fau
\
--enable-debug \
--with-perl=/usr/bin/perl
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Scott Smith wrote:
> Did you --with-sasl=/usr/local ??
>
> 2.0.12 does the same for me without that option.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > /usr/
Searched google last night, came across a problem with 'case sensitivity'
(two folders, same name, different case) and where Outlook can't handle it
so crashes ... point it out to the user, she removed the duplicate and all
works great ...
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Simon Loader wrote
Okay, think I hit enough points in the subject :)
I'm looking at using pam-pgsql to do authentication, instead of sasldb ...
I'm hitting problems with sasldb that I can't explain, where users
passwords all of a sudden don't work, and figure if I move into a db
environment, at least I can better
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 13:37:42 -0300 (ADT)
>From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [...]
>If I do an 'saslpasswd -d marc' to remove myself from the sasldb file,
>then try and re-connect with pine, I get the following error:
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 13:37:42 -0300 (ADT)
>From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [...]
>If I do an 'saslpasswd -d marc' to remove myself from the sasldb file,
>then try and re-connect with pine, I get the following error:
On Mon, 7 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Larry Greenfield writes:
> >
> >However, since there's no secret for the user "marc" in /etc/sasldb,
> >Pine can't use CRAM-MD5.
>
> This is a generic problem with c-client. If the server advertizes
> CRAM-MD5, the client will try only CRAM-MD5, and
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:37:42 -0300 (ADT)
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> marc.fournier> If I do an 'saslpasswd -d marc' to remove myself from the sasldb file,
> marc.fournier> then try and re-connect with pine, I get the fo
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 7 May 2001 16:33:46 -0300 (ADT)
> >>>>> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> scrappy> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On Mon, 7 M
This one I love ... someone arguing a point that, if adhered to by one
piece of software, would make it totally incompatible with those other
pieces of software that you are tryign to interact with ...
pam_ should not be setting the rules as to what is or is not
acceptable, the authentication se
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Nuno Silva wrote:
>
> I'm sorry if i wasn't 100% clean on the subject.
> The point is that - in un*x - usernames starting with anything else than
> a letter [a-z] will not work properly.
not true here either ... the University that I work at, since before I
ever got there, h
54 matches
Mail list logo
