I keep a plastic shrunken head and a voodoo rattle in my toolbox.
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 05:38, Kiarna Boyd wrote:
> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will receive a fabulo
Amos Gouaux wrote:
>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:38:25 -0500,
>>Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
>>
>
>kb> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
>kb> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
>kb> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:38:25 -0500,
> Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
kb> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
kb> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
kb> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will receive a fabulous lifelike toy
D]
Subject: Re: mailboxes, db or flat
>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:34:47 +0200 (EET),
>>>>> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:
lh> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
lh> hesitation of using BerkeleyD
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:34:47 +0200 (EET),
> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:
lh> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
lh> hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
lh> 32000 lines in the mailboxes file.
I think
Leena Heino schrieb am Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:34:47PM +0200:
> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
> hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
> 32000 lines in the mailboxes file.
>
> What kind of problems has there been with Berke
We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
32000 lines in the mailboxes file.
What kind of problems has there been with BerkeleyDB mailboxes?
What kind of problems has there been with flat file mai
