I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
My newest cyrus server(thoth) will receive a fabulous lifelike toy donkey if it 
manages to survive a month in production.
Most of my older servers are making due with festive drink umbrellas at the moment.
I never discuss replacing servers  in the server room.

;)

-Kiarna
(can you tell I spend too much time at work?)

-----Original Message-----
From:   Amos Gouaux [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:04 AM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: mailboxes, db or flat

>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:34:47 +0200 (EET),
>>>>> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:

lh> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
lh> hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
lh> 32000 lines in the mailboxes file.

I think a bigger concern is the actual load you tend to see.  Before
we upgraded to a post-2.0.16 CVS snapshot back in September of this
year we had just over 64000 lines in our mailboxes file, however
we've been using BDB mailboxes database without serious problems
(*knock on wood*).  This is a Solaris 8 box--recently patched--with
BDB 3.3.11.

(I hate talking about machines, especially those that have been
doing fairly well.  I'm convinced they can hear you.  Just when you
say everything is all peachy, they up and loose a drive, power
supply, memory goes bad, etc, etc.  Now ain't that paranoid!)

-- 
Amos

Reply via email to