Shelley,
Shelley Waltz schrieb (30.11.2011 19:16 Uhr):
> Yes, I looked into this on-access scanner. What I was thinking was
> more like the postfix amavisd model, where the incoming goes through
> a filter before arriving at inbox. Is there a way to do this with
> sieve - send mail to a filte
Marc Patermann wrote:
> Shelley,
>
> Shelley Waltz schrieb (30.11.2011 16:47 Uhr):
>> I have two imap servers, one which has smtp(postfix) and virus scanning
>> before delivery to imap.
>>
>> I have another imap archive server which has no smtp, but users simply
On 11/30/2011 12:41 PM, Marc Patermann wrote:
> Shelley,
>
> Shelley Waltz schrieb (30.11.2011 16:47 Uhr):
>> I have two imap servers, one which has smtp(postfix) and virus scanning
>> before delivery to imap.
>>
>> I have another imap archive server which has
Shelley,
Shelley Waltz schrieb (30.11.2011 16:47 Uhr):
> I have two imap servers, one which has smtp(postfix) and virus scanning
> before delivery to imap.
>
> I have another imap archive server which has no smtp, but users simply
> move messages from their imap account(s) to the
I have two imap servers, one which has smtp(postfix) and virus scanning
before delivery to imap.
I have another imap archive server which has no smtp, but users simply
move messages from their imap account(s) to the archive server. It appears
that some messages have infections.
My question is
>
>
> You mean mail already already in your INBOXes received before you have
> installed your trendmicros filter, or mail sent internally by your
> user ?
>
> In the last case the simple solution is to ask your user to send email
> directly to your trendmicro !
> If this is not possible yo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:27 PM, andreas moroder
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a imp/postfix/cyrus system. The mail that goes out and comes in
> from/to our system via smtp is checked by trendmicros virus wall.
>
> The problem is mail that remains in our mailsystem and is access
On 20 Feb 09, at 1727, andreas moroder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a imp/postfix/cyrus system. The mail that goes out and comes
> in
> from/to our system via smtp is checked by trendmicros virus wall.
>
> The problem is mail that remains in our mailsystem and is accesse
Hello,
we have a imp/postfix/cyrus system. The mail that goes out and comes in
from/to our system via smtp is checked by trendmicros virus wall.
The problem is mail that remains in our mailsystem and is accessed via
imap from imp. Viruswall has no way to check this mail.
Is it possible to write
n the way in, and its not always because of updated virus definitions.
We don't understand the difference, but it happens... That system has
worked well for us for over a year. However, most of our users are with
POP, and the IMAP users seldom use disconnected mode...
Sebastian Hage
believe that you can't get
100% protection. SO we try to educate our users to stay alert and not to
rely only on virus scanners. Modifying mail that's already been delivered
seems too intrusive to me. YMMV, obviously.
Cheers, Sebastian Hagedorn
--
Sebastian Hagedorn
let people know that something had been pulled from
their mailbox.
Huaqing Zheng wrote:
On 10/11/05, Dan MacNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're moving from courier to cyrus.
Right now, when a new clamav virus signature comes we rescan /var/mail
and move any infected messages we missed
On 10/11/05, Dan MacNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're moving from courier to cyrus.
>
> Right now, when a new clamav virus signature comes we rescan /var/mail
> and move any infected messages we missed on the way in. Courier is fine
> w/ this.
>
> Cyrus do
We're moving from courier to cyrus.
Right now, when a new clamav virus signature comes we rescan /var/mail
and move any infected messages we missed on the way in. Courier is fine
w/ this.
Cyrus doesn't seem to like it.
Would would it be clean to replace the file with another me
Symantec antivirus through ICAP and
more. If you use smtp-vilter you do not have to rip up the mail twice with
spam checking and then virus scanning. It's all done when the mail is "open".
Enjoy clamav. I love it.
Regards
/Per-Olov
On Monday 25 July 2005 20.01, Philip Edelbrock w
I found clamav to work quite well.
http://www.clamav.net/
It works through a sendmail-milter. It connects periodicly to the 'net
to get virus sig updates. It blocks more than virii, too, including
(configurable) encrypted archives, broken executables, phishing emails, etc.
Phil
M
Hello,
I'm looking for a solution to clean cyrus' mailboxes from viruses (I already
have mailscanner working on incoming mails).
I'm running cyrus imapd 2.1 on debian sarge and I've found very little
information about that matter.
The most usable solution I've found comes from this link :
http
šZtòÍâ6g•1oNuVRØ´
0Ü�•RÅ`«àR‚¹3ϳz±Ø&¶óQ¾M'6˜VT¢\˜¶f…#éD2ÑqV¡œý˜‘Ì!£"{Æ̲ëò9ª7$ß5Üg$Æ�I�‘¡¯Ófè
Ô®ü4¬§—í„2 ‡²î(‹~°Âæ
TÛã�Ë-æ?U9s5̳¡´Ø²·?¥áÊ2«Ë
Ç×ßS´†ÌÖçµz`4Y`*Âø¢á`ÅÄ™Þê>°VV ŠsrAÏâWç|tj[Az
”W"ùÔ)X8êêùí’þˆ¨Š„«6|¦k|\Þ†m�~ë–r(ÚÜûG¢sÐÑâ‹:[VF†qÞB|ºûFlã_
more info is attached.
This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
--
The original e-mail attachment "information.zip"
was believed to be infected by a virus and has been replaced by this warn
‚¸Lª\7éòHySëãma
'Î6Ö[ãL‰®ÞK¯I7Üp�ŠqØèe¯•¨ÕÎÖÈx½Ãv&¶ð×2ðªc„XèÓ ÏJ/ˆ»^¹#ëžÃaédðæS�·Œ\¶äàI:™'<˜¤t§²
´ïw¶ÏóPßH³O|§õ&¦Ð“÷CÏÕ¬ßÄÈÔ?æ™<ϱ®Ë,æ±rU?~’5覘٬°ü"Œ¶(C>æüDª
This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
-
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Scanning time = 4/15/2005 2:29:03 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.510-1002/2.570.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Scanning time = 4/15/2005 1:58:30 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.510-1002/2.570.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Scanning time = 4/15/2005 1:44:27 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.510-1002/2.570.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment
The original message was received at Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:22:08 +0200
from lists.andrew.cmu.edu [193.104.43.98]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KWF Email scanner was unable to check following file (i.e. corrupted/encrypted
zip archive):
Hello, i'm using cyrus from a nearly all made box on suse linux standard
server, all is working quite great, i've implemented a virus solution with
amavisd and clamav, my problem is that once the virus file has been
quarantined i cannot restore it, i can move the mail to the user m
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Scanning time = 7/31/2004 1:05:26 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/1.947.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment
On Sunday 20 June 2004 22:25, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Not unless someone writes the extensions. And even then Sieve has no
> global script definitions, just per user. So really no.
Allright then.
Thanks a lot.
Antoine
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyru
Not unless someone writes the extensions. And even then Sieve has no
global script definitions, just per user. So really no.
--On Sunday, June 20, 2004 19:57 +0200 Antoine Jacoutot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2004 19:50, Jim Levie wrote:
Take a look at MailScanner
(http://www
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 10:04, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I was wondering if it was in any way possible to use a global sieve
> configurarion that would check incoming messages with spamassassin+clamav ?
> Thanks.
> Regards,
>
Take a look at MailScanner
(http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mai
On Sunday 20 June 2004 19:50, Jim Levie wrote:
> Take a look at MailScanner
> (http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/index.html)
Oh, I know mailscanner... as a matter of fact, I also used mimedefang,
amavis... but I was wondering if sieve could globally check for spam and
viruses.
Antoine
Hi :)
I was wondering if it was in any way possible to use a global sieve
configurarion that would check incoming messages with spamassassin+clamav ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antoine
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: htt
Please read the document.
Title: VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
The WebShield® e500 Appliance discovered a virus in this file.
The file was not cleaned and has been removed.
See your system administrator for further information.
File name: .xx.pif
Virus name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
Title: VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
The WebShield® e500 Appliance discovered a virus in this file.
The file was not cleaned and has been removed.
See your system administrator
Antigen for Exchange found doc.zip->doc.txt
.pif infected with VIRUS= W32/MyDoom-A
(Sophos,NAI,Kaspersky,Norman) worm.
The message is currently Purged. The message, "Test", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
Title: VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
The WebShield® e500 Appliance discovered a virus in this file.
The file was not cleaned and has been removed.
See your system administrator for further information.
File name
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
Title: VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
VIRUS INFECTION ALERT
The WebShield® e500 Appliance discovered a virus in this file.
The file was not cleaned and has been removed.
See your system administrator
Has anyone investigated the virus yet, as it seems to be replicating itself.
Just wondering if since this one is the same over and over if it would
be possible to block that email from the list, or strip attachments
named message.zip from incoming emails for the time being, to prevent
further
ich re-uses
>> checker-instances.
>>
>> So,
>> Is there any better way to do this?
>>
>> ++Titus
>>
>
> Check out MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) for a Virus/Spam mail
> filtering product that plugs into the sendmail/exim/whatever flow and uses
&g
y to do this?
>
> ++Titus
>
Check out MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) for a Virus/Spam mail
filtering product that plugs into the sendmail/exim/whatever flow and uses
SpamAssassin for it's main spam checking/marking.
I use it to deliver to my cyrus server and just wrote a si
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, foobar wrote:
> Is this (see subject) possible in anyway per account basis in sieve? ( I
> don't remember if there was any proper plugin-support in sieve (haven't
> investigated the code too much ).
No, the sieve code is much less extensible than we'd like (it's hard to
add a
Hi,
Is this (see subject) possible in anyway per account basis in sieve? ( I
don't remember if there was any proper plugin-support in sieve (haven't
investigated the code too much ).
Thing what I done was when I didn't invent anything else and was lazy to
read the code:
MTA lmtp-> sa_lmtpd (pre-
Mark London schrieb:
Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
(no subject). The pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irrelevant question. The fact that it could happen is enough. I can't stop
my users going to someone's computer (which has no virus protection) and
connecting to my IMAP server. I have students who will no doubt use the
IMAP server as a filestore when they
Bottom line: The virus scanning should be done by your MTA. If you muck
around in user mailboxes, deleting messages willy nilly without letting
Cyrus know, you *will* corrupt users' mailstores, unless you tediously
plan to run reconstruct on a mailbox everytime a virus is found. Unless
t see the 'elsewhere in this thread' mail yet, but anyway:
>
>This is technically correct.
>
>(a) That 'poisoned attachment' came from somewhere -- where? If from
Irrelevant question. The fact that it could happen is enough. I can't stop
my users going to some
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
I do the virus sca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
MTA is?
Because (as
On 21 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>> How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>> with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>> when it receives mail? Or a similar appro
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
>MTA is?
Because (as mentioned elsew
At 16:56 -0500 Brian wrote:
>Mark London said:
>
>> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
>> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
>> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on
'd say that you've
> >> created your own problem.
> >
> >I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> >alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> > people using cyrus that are running virus scan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Alton Tamplin writes:
>Ted Cabeen wrote:
>>Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
>>this solution? (We were thinking of using this to
Ted Cabeen wrote:
Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
this solution? (We were thinking of using this to delete old messages from
users spam folders)
If your users all have spam folders named the same or similar
(presumably put there by spam filtering
On 21 Jan 2003, Mark London writes:
>>> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message
>>> file that contains a virus. ...
>> If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a
>> program, and then you get upset when the program d
Mark London said:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
There was a discussion on this l
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
You told it to...
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
Yes, you don't let the virus in the server on the first place,
Mark London wrote:
I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
I think most people scanning their mail do so befo
We run Interscan VirusWall--it only deleted the infected attachment, and
leaves the message intact (with a note inside telling the user that the
attachment was deleted). This makes for some confusion (the user still wants
the attachment, thinking it is real mail, and not just a virus. That seems
On 21 Jan 2003 at 16:31, Mark London wrote:
>
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
T
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> >(Note that you can also rebuild the mailbox with the reconstruct command,
> >but I don't recommend this as a general solution).
>
> Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
> this solution? (We were thinking of using this
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
If you use se
set when the program doesn't work, I'd say that you've
>created your own problem.
>
>If you really want to do this, convince your virus scanner to delete the
>files via the IMAP protocol instead of arbitrarly altering data structures
>that it knows nothing about.
>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
Run a scanner as
> > Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> > contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> > so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> > (no subject). The probl
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> (
Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
(no subject). The problem is that this message can't be d
cyrus-mailinglist wrote:
>
> Hi Folks!
>
> One Question!
>
> What is the best virusscanner 4 FreeBSD?
>
This all depends on opinon there are several
out there and if you run in linux comaptabilty mode
you can find even more. Sophos is quite good.
I like f-prot which is doing a free beta test
Hi Folks!
One Question!
What is the best virusscanner 4 FreeBSD?
Thanks 4 your answers!
--
Oliver Kaufmann
Moser & Partner
[T]+43 5522 701 54 14
[F]+43 5522 701 54 19
[E][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try AMaViS - A Mail Virus Scanner at -> www.amavis.org.
RB
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cyrus-mailinglistSent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:14
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: virus scanner
for cyrus
hello fo
hello folks!
i have one question! i need a mailvirusscanner for cyrus server does some
know one?
thanks in advance
oliver kaufmann
hello folks!
i have one question! i need a mailvirusscanner for
cyrus server does some know one?
thanks in advance
oliver kaufmann
Yes, I generally agree with your statement, and I plan to offer that as an
optional feature (on by default) of what I am building. However there are
times that you want to be able to receive all content sent to an email
account, infected or not, and there are times when virus definition
I would think that virus scanning and attachment blocking should be part of
the MTA. Failing that, it could be sandwitched between MTA and local
delivery agent.
A user could have contracted the virus before the being scanned using a poll
type method.
FWIW, I am currently working on getting
It would likely need a little modification, but amavis
(http://www.amavis.org) should have most of the functionality you need.
Amavis works by splitting open RFC822 mail files with MIME aor other
attachments and running an external virus scanner (such as uvscan from
McAfee) on them, then
Hi All -
I'm about to begin on a project that will probably involve a web interface
to a Cyrus message store. As part of this I would like the interface to be
able to trigger a virus scan of a particular user's messages, and report
the results.
Can anyone recommend a virus scanner
> Both these systems are pretty expensive, so you may want to look at some
> open-source options such as Amavis (www.amavis.org). Because of the
> amount of unglamourous work that is involved in maintaining a database
> of virus identifiers, there aren't any truly Free virus sca
As others have pointed out the virus scanning is best handled by the MTA
not your imap server. This allows outgoing mail to be scanned as well which
is good when a virus such as sircam gets through (say via a web browser
email site) and starts spreading elsewhere.
For us the primary condition
imap mail server to scan emails as they
> come in for viruses.
> I don't know of any linux email virus scanners which can scan mime and
> uu encoded files.
> Is anyone currently doing this, and if so, how ?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>
>
> --
> Noth
as Amavis (www.amavis.org). Because of the
amount of unglamourous work that is involved in maintaining a database
of virus identifiers, there aren't any truly Free virus scanners
available as far as I know. If I remember correctly, Amavis basically is
an interface to Sendmail (or Postfix, or whatev
Check out www.amavis.org. It works with various linux/unix virus scanners.
I use it here in combination with postfix and it works like a charm.
Alain Turbide
- Original Message -
From: "James Courtier-Dutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mond
From: "James Courtier-Dutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a cyrus imap linux server set up serving a small office.
> Is is possible to get the cyrus imap mail server to scan emails as they
come
> in for viruses.
> I don't know of any linux email virus sc
Hello
I have a cyrus imap linux server set up serving a small office.
Is is possible to get the cyrus imap mail server to scan emails as they come
in for viruses.
I don't know of any linux email virus scanners which can scan mime and uu
encoded files.
Is anyone currently doing this, and
we made great experiences with a combination of:
cyrus + sendmail/libmilter + amavisd
if you have a version of sendmail which supports libmilter (starting with 8.11
I guess), you should really try this! It doesn't require changing your
deliver/lmtp configuration in sendmail.cf since libmilter
I'll second that recommendation of Interscan Viruswall. We're also
running it on Redhat. Installation was easy, it automatically
downloads virus info updates weekly, web-based management interface is
convenient...
The only real downside I've seen is that application security
--On Friday, July 27, 2001 3:46 AM -0700 rj45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wisely declaimed:
>
> Hello,
> I Wanted to ask if does exisit some product which can interact with cyrus
> as an anti-virus program. I heard of programs changing the extension of
> file names attachmen
try to use amavis (http://www.amavis.org/). amavis can configured to scan
> incoming and outgoing mail. amavis scans within your MTA so you dont need a
> specail cyrus anti-virus program.
outgoing is not so easy i think!
>
> Nico
>
>
> rj45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrie
try to use amavis (http://www.amavis.org/). amavis can configured to scan
incoming and outgoing mail. amavis scans within your MTA so you dont need a
specail cyrus anti-virus program.
Nico
rj45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> Hello,
> I Wanted to ask if does exisit some pr
We run avp anti-virus with very good results. They got a server version for linux that
works with cyrus, + postfix of sendmail or qmail.
;)
Tarjei
- Original Message -
From: "rj45" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 1
Hello,
I Wanted to ask if does exisit some product which can interact with cyrus
as an anti-virus program. I heard of programs changing the extension of
file names attachments to avoid dangerous viruses to being executed
automatically in the form of .pif windows file for example renaming .pif
in
> I saw inflex <http://www.inflex.co.za/> on freshmeat recently, it seemed
> like a good idea to me but I was put off by the version number.
We currently are using inflex on our mail hubs using sendmail. Inflex itself is
a relatively simple perl script that calls a virus che
> Trend Micro updates pattern files weekly and when something like an
> ILOVEYOU virus or a PrettyPark comes out, by the time you get into work
> in the morning the update will be available and probably already
> downloaded and installed.
You can configure the real product to update d
Check out PerlMx -- an all purpose, extremely low-level mail filtering
API scripted using Perl. You should be able to roll your own virus
protection with it. Only runs with sendmail.
<http://activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/index.html>
Cheers,
Corey
And upon Thursday of October 2
Linux version.
Trend Micro updates pattern files weekly and when something like an
ILOVEYOU virus or a PrettyPark comes out, by the time you get into work
in the morning the update will be available and probably already
downloaded and installed.
Keep in mind that new viruses and worms get sprung
Anti-virus for e-mail..
We run postfix as our MTA and cyrus as our MDA.
Our anti-virus package is f-secure (www.fsecure.com) and is updated by an
ftp script every night.
Our e-mail is dipped by amavis (www.amavis.org) between postfix and cyrus.
Postfix delivers to amavis which unpacks the
On 10/25/00 03:45:18 PM -0400 John Conant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+--
| Hi all,
|We have Cyrus server 1.6 running on RedHat Linux 6.2 (on Intel). I'm
|wondering if there's an anti-virus client I could run on the server [in
|addition to hoping all
Hi all,
We have Cyrus server 1.6 running on RedHat Linux 6.2 (on Intel). I'm
wondering if there's an anti-virus client I could run on the server [in
addition to hoping all the mail clients are configured to work with a local
a-v program...]. It would have to be (1) on linux
96 matches
Mail list logo
