On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:26:30PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> Hi, Bron
>
> This patch works fine.
Great - so now I just have to fix your subscription issue :)
Bron.
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
Hi, Bron
This patch works fine.
Regards
Zinato
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:36PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
>> When i delete a message ( technically, move to trash ) one copy of message
>> is created in mailbox Trash but the me
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:43:39PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> --On 13. Oktober 2010 17:50:55 -0400 Bron Gondwana
> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:27:32PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> >>With Thunderbird 3.1.3 i can subscribe only in folders located in
> >>Backend1
> >>
>
--On 13. Oktober 2010 17:50:55 -0400 Bron Gondwana
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:27:32PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
With Thunderbird 3.1.3 i can subscribe only in folders located in
Backend1
where my account "lucas.carraro" exist.
The other folder in backend2 are not avaiable
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:27:32PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> > With Thunderbird 3.1.3 i can subscribe only in folders located in
> > Backend1
> >
> > where my account "lucas.carraro" exist.
>
> > The other folder in backend2 are not avaiable for me:
> Actually
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:27:32PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> With Thunderbird 3.1.3 i can subscribe only in folders located in Backend1
>
> where my account "lucas.carraro" exist.
> The other folder in backend2 are not avaiable for me:
Actually, you're subscribing fine - we're just
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:36PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> When i delete a message ( technically, move to trash ) one copy of message
> is created in mailbox Trash but the message remains on INBOX.
Ok - here's the patch that fixes this issue.
It will be in the next release, and you
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:36PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing the new Cyrus Imapd Version 2.4.0
>
> I have a murder ( aggregation) enviromment.
> ---
>
> Using a Webmail ( Expresso: http://www.expr
Hello,
It's good to know, but you should report it to the IMAP::Sieve maintainer
(check cpan.org to know how to join him)
Cheers,
Clement Hermann (nodens)
PS : sorry for top-reply, blame the android gmail client :-/)
Le 2009 12 15 03:37, "Denis BUCHER" a écrit :
Dear all,
I don't know if th
Edward Prendergast wrote:
> Sorry - that was a typo in the command. I did ascertain that I should've
> been using a username not a mailbox name and changed the command
> accordingly, as you can see in the logs below.
>
> I'm not sure how to apply this information about the unix hierarchy
> separa
nce to the copying of mailboxes or does this
pertain to transferring the user data?
-Original Message-
From: Rudy Gevaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2007 14:10
To: Edward Prendergast
Cc: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Problem with cyrus replication: failing to u
Edward Prendergast wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've given up on cyrus-murder for now and am just focusing on replication.
>
> When I run /usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/sync_client -v -l -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> it errors on the master:
-u takes usernames, not mailbox names. Try -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also note that b
On Thursday 07 September 2006 06:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet ps3151.persistent.co.in
> imap
> Trying 10.77.196.105...
> Connected to ps3151.persistent.co.in
> (10.77.196.105).
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
> Nothing more than that. If I type some command, that
> is n
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote [Thursday, September 07, 2006
05:54:05 PM +0530]
Hi Sven,
Thanks a lot for your reply. even this is not working. One thing more,
when I do telnet to my machine (acting as a server), then also, I am not
able to run any IMAP command such as login, logout etc. I am get
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 17:54 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Sven,
> Thanks a lot for your reply. even this is not working. One thing more,
> when I do telnet to my machine (acting as a server), then also, I am
> not able to run any IMAP command such as login, logout etc. I am
> getting a blank
riginal message
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:38:34 +0200
From: Sven Lepiorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with Cyrus
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have installed and configured cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 and
>> cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 on my Lin
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
hi
i m using cyrus2.2.8 and berkeley DB 4.2.52 on a Fedora core 2 machine
and i have the following problem.
i always got the message in my cyrus logfile
Aug 23 04:36:14 molure lmtp[29038]: DBERROR db4: 1326 lockers
with the number increasing and not reall
> "Luca Manganelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/08/04 05:50pm >>>
>Hi,
>
>I hope that this is the right mailing list for my question.
>
>I compiled and installed Cyrus imap (v2.2.3) and Cyrus sasl (v 2.1.7)
on my redhat 7.3 server.
>
>The imapd.conf is this:
>
>--
El Viernes, 5 de Septiembre de 2003 17:32, James Miller escribió:
> I had a similar problem; check the interval the client checks for mail. I
> had a user who was checking every minute and had about 50 folders. It was
> sometimes taking longer than a minute to complete the check when the next
> c
El Miércoles, 3 de Septiembre de 2003 22:25, pheonix1t escribió:
> did you try installing the outlook updates? I had similar problems,
> after installing all the updates from the ms office update website, it
> worked fine.
Yes, I tried it with the updates, without success :-(
What is really amazi
Jose Antonio Becerra Permuy wrote:
Hi everybody!
I have a very strange problem and I write this to see if somebody else have
face it before.
The imap server is cyrus-imapd 2.1.14.
Clients are Microsoft Outlook XP running on Windows XP.
Four clients have no problems at all.
One client hangs many t
Mark London schrieb:
Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
(no subject). The problem i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irrelevant question. The fact that it could happen is enough. I can't stop
my users going to someone's computer (which has no virus protection) and
connecting to my IMAP server. I have students who will no doubt use the
IMAP server as a filestore when they run out of quot
Bottom line: The virus scanning should be done by your MTA. If you muck
around in user mailboxes, deleting messages willy nilly without letting
Cyrus know, you *will* corrupt users' mailstores, unless you tediously
plan to run reconstruct on a mailbox everytime a virus is found. Unless
your name
On Jan 21 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>> Because (as mentioned elsewhere in this thread) lmtpd is not the
>> only way messages can be stored on an IMAP server: eg think of
>> sending a poisoned attachment, which magically ends up in your sent
>> folder.
>
>I don't see the 'elsewhere in this thread' mai
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
I do the virus scanning and spam f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
MTA is?
Because (as men
On 21 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>> How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>> with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>> when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your
>> cho
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
>MTA is?
Because (as mentioned elsewhere in this t
At 16:56 -0500 Brian wrote:
>Mark London said:
>
>> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
>> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
>> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
>> server?
But uvscan is treati
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:58 pm, Will Day wrote:
> A short time ago, at a computer terminal not so far away, Mark London wrote:
> >> If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a program, and
> >> then you get upset when the program doesn't work, I'd say that you've
> >> created y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Alton Tamplin writes:
>Ted Cabeen wrote:
>>Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
>>this solution? (We were thinking of using this to
Ted Cabeen wrote:
Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
this solution? (We were thinking of using this to delete old messages from
users spam folders)
If your users all have spam folders named the same or similar
(presumably put there by spam filtering
On 21 Jan 2003, Mark London writes:
>>> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message
>>> file that contains a virus. ...
>> If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a
>> program, and then you get upset when the program doesn't work, I'd
>> say that you've creat
Mark London said:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
There was a discussion on this last week. Search the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
You told it to...
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
Yes, you don't let the virus in the server on the first place, using a
content scanni
Mark London wrote:
I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
I think most people scanning their mail do so before it is
We run Interscan VirusWall--it only deleted the infected attachment, and
leaves the message intact (with a note inside telling the user that the
attachment was deleted). This makes for some confusion (the user still wants
the attachment, thinking it is real mail, and not just a virus. That seems
to
On 21 Jan 2003 at 16:31, Mark London wrote:
>
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
The only valid way to acc
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> >(Note that you can also rebuild the mailbox with the reconstruct command,
> >but I don't recommend this as a general solution).
>
> Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
> this solution? (We were thinking of using this
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
If you use sendmail, set up MIMEDe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob S
iemborski writes:
>On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
>If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a program, and
>then you get upset when the program
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
Run a scanner as a part of your MT
> > Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> > contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> > so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> > (no subject). The problem is that this message can't
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> (no subject). The pr
Simon Matter schrieb am Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:22:22PM +0200:
> ben schrieb:
> >
> > We will soon get a NAS (Network Appliance or other vendor). How connect our
> > farm server to it ?
>
> You may want to use SAN instead of NAS. Sharing of storage will be
> possible this way.
>
> > Else what o
D]>; "'ben'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:14 PM
> Subject: RE: Problem with Cyrus & Authentification method
>
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL
Which version of cyrus are you using? And why do you say that the problem is
with cyrus-sasl? ctl_mboxlist is using cyrus-imapd mailbox database.
You can try to kill ctl_mboxlist, then go to /usr/cyrus/bin do su cyrus and
run ./ctl_cyrusdb -r. I guess in older versions it was ctl_mboxlist -r but
Oh, also check /etc/cyrus.conf so you have
sievecmd="timsieved" listen="sieve" prefork=0
under SERVICES
Sincerely,
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "Kennedy van Dam Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "info-cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 18:43
Subject: Prob
El sábado, 12 enero, 2002, a las 06:44 , simon escribió:"
>>After verified that the user exists and that it even has a folder (kk),
>>then I try to inject a mail into icordoba+solomodacom user:
>>sh-2.05$ cat /tmp/mensaje | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver icordoba+solomodacom
>>icordoba+solomodacom: Mai
>>I'd blame Outlook Express but unfortunately I have another working IMAP
>>server for comparision ;)
>>
>
> I disagree. You're well justified in calling it buggy and recommending
> something else.
I already heard people complaining like "this IMAP stuff is much worse
than the POP3 and is n
> Cyrus caches seen state in memory for a time before flushing it to
> disk. Generally this works quite well; I use Outlook Express and
> don't seem to have this problem, but perhaps I just don't do this
> exact sequence of clicks.
>
> It's possible to force Cyrus to synchronize seen state more q
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:40:46 -0600
From: John Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Oakton Community College
CC: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Heiki Kask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
[... cyrus locks a file it already has locked ...]
seen_lockread()
Since I have been working on the 2.0.16 locking problem (per my previous e-mails),
I have been taking a good long look at the seen locking behavior and I must admit
confusion as to whether this is working as intended or if it is buggy.
First of all, I am reasonably convinced that the locking prob
>> - user opens INBOX and clicks on one unseen mail.
>> - This mail is marked as Read on Outlook Express.
>> - user clicks on Send/Recv button to check new mail.
> It's a problem with Outlook Express interacting with the Cyrus-IMAP server.
> What is happening is that OE is connecting to the Cy
Cyrus caches seen state in memory for a time before flushing it to
disk. Generally this works quite well; I use Outlook Express and
don't seem to have this problem, but perhaps I just don't do this
exact sequence of clicks.
It's possible to force Cyrus to synchronize seen state more quickly
with
> When Cyrus-IMAP writes the seen state, it first makes a copy of cyrus.seen
> to cyrus.seen.new(?). This allows other IMAP connections to read the seen
> state from cyrus.seen, while the first connection is updating
> cyrus.seen.new(?). When it finishes it moves the file to cyrus.seen.
I see
From: "Heiki Kask" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have following problem with Cyrus/Outlook express:
>
> - user opens INBOX and clicks on one unseen mail.
> - This mail is marked as Read on Outlook Express.
> - user clicks on Send/Recv button to check new mail.
> - Outlook Express marks previously marked
Fantastic. Now it works fine.
Very very thanks
Best regards
Stefano
-Original Message-
From: Francesc Guasch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: mercoledì 9 maggio 2001 13.52
To: Stefano Coatti
Cc: 'Cyrus List (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: Problem with Cyrus::IMAP::Admin
Stef
Stefano Coatti wrote:
>
> I tried to write my personal script to make batch command in
> creating/listing/deleting user & mailboxes.
I login like this:
my $plen = length($pass);
warn ("$user $pass\n");
$imap->send(undef,undef,"LOGIN $user {$plen}\r\n$pass")
60 matches
Mail list logo
