Hi!
The sieve scripts in global namespace don't work for any user unless that user
explicitely includes the global sieve script in their own sieve script. You
can't just create a global sieve script and expect it to apply for all your
users; you're going to have to create a way to modify the sieve
> We have a postfix+cyrus+Spamassassin setup and all the virus or Banned
> or spam e-mails will move to a folder on /var/virusmails.\
> I have a falseposative mail moved due to a banned attachment name.
> Could you please help me to retrieve these e-mails?
If it really is dumped into a folder in
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:10:28AM -0600, Saltmarsh, Evan M wrote:
>
>
> Nov 29 10:25:17 imap_svr imap[14331]: [ID 702911 auth.error] sql_select
> option missing
>
> Nov 29 10:25:17 imap_svr imap[14331]: [ID 702911 auth.error] auxpropfunc
> error no mechanism available
this looks a bit strang
> You say 'problems' what more precisely are the symptoms?
> Sorry I seem to
> have missed them on the threads.
Sometimes I forget to hit "reply all" instead of just "reply" for this list,
so that may be why you missed some :)
We have two problems with Outlook 2002 SP3 right now. The crucial
--On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 13:43 -0400 Doug Koobs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy,
We are only having the problem when selecting folders that have thousands
of emails in it (which, of course, would only be the executives!). The
version is OL2002, SP3. OE and Squirrelmail have no problem at a
> Let me chime in here to say that we have Outlook users running a wide
> variety of versions, but I've never heard of a problem like
> this from our
> users. If you have an exact version of Outlook and the steps
> to repeat
> this problem, I could try to replicate it here...
Andy,
We are onl
Let me chime in here to say that we have Outlook users running a wide
variety of versions, but I've never heard of a problem like this from our
users. If you have an exact version of Outlook and the steps to repeat
this problem, I could try to replicate it here...
Andy
On Tue, 13 Apr 20
Andrzej Filip wrote:
Mike O'Rourke wrote:
Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/20/04 11:14pm >>>
After installing a version of Cyrus that actually supports Virtual
Domains (doh!) and getting the sendmail.mc
setup properly, it looks like I got it working.
I still would like to be able to
Mike O'Rourke wrote:
Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/20/04 11:14pm >>>
After installing a version of Cyrus that actually supports Virtual
Domains (doh!) and getting the sendmail.mc
setup properly, it looks like I got it working.
I still would like to be able to get root mail accepte
> Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/20/04 11:14pm >>>
>
>After installing a version of Cyrus that actually supports Virtual
Domains (doh!) and getting the sendmail.mc
>setup properly, it looks like I got it working.
>
>I still would like to be able to get root mail accepted and sent to
t
ch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 19, 2004 2:47 PM
To: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
echo "=M"|sendmail -bt|grep cyrus
mailer 3 (cyrusv2): P
Christopher Paluch wrote:
echo "=M"|sendmail -bt|grep cyrus
mailer 3 (cyrusv2): P=[IPC] S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromL
> R=EnvToL/HdrToL M=0 U=0:0 F=/:@ADFMXlmnqsz|
> L=0 E=\r\n T=DNS/RFC822/SMTP r=100 A=FILE /var/imap/socket/lmtp
It looks like my overrides for S= and R= aren't working,
> which is causin
r Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
Christopher Paluch wrote:
> It looks like from the output of the "sendmail -X", that the problem is sendmail is
> sending Cyrus, test.one as the mailbox, not [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
;
Sent: Feb 19, 2004 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
>05420 >>> 221 2.0.0 server.adomain.com closing connection
>05422 <<< 220 server.adomain.com LMTP Cyrus v
>>> >>> DATA
>05422 >>> <<< 550-Mailbox unknown. Either there is no mailbox
associated with t
>05422 >>> <<< 550-name or you do not have authorization to see it.
>05422 >>> <<< 550 5.1.1 User unknown
>05422 >>
L PROTECTED]>... User unknown
05422 >>> <<< 503 5.5.1 No recipients
05422 >>>
05422 >>> --i1JHK3jk005422.1077211203/server.adomain.com
05422 >>> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
05422 >>>
05422 >>> Reporting-MTA: dns; server.adomai
unknown
05422 >>> <<< 503 5.5.1 No recipients
05422 >>>
05422 >>> --i1JHK3jk005422.1077211203/server.adomain.com
05422 >>> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
05422 >>>
05422 >>> Reporting-MTA: dns; server.adomain.com
05422 >>>
19, 2004 10:54 AM
To: Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 17:00 schrieb Christopher Paluch:
> This is the output from the maillog:
>
> Feb 19 09:22:54 ecn
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 17:00 schrieb Christopher Paluch:
> This is the output from the maillog:
>
> Feb 19 09:22:54 ecnsrc01 sendmail[4856]: i1JFMsuJ004856:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00,
> mailer=cyrusv2, pri=31408, relay=localhost [[UNIX: /var/imap/socket/lmtp
Sent: Feb 19, 2004 9:49 AM
To: Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 16:09 schrieb Christopher Paluch:
> -Forwarded Message-
> From: Christopher Pal
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 16:09 schrieb Christopher Paluch:
> -Forwarded Message-
> From: Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Feb 19, 2004 8:50 AM
> To: Mike O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
Jay Levitt wrote:
By the way.. just noticed a bug in the RPM's version of imapd.conf. It sets
"sieveuserhomedir" to no. The actual imapd.conf variable is
"sieveusehomedir" (use, not user). It doesn't matter, because the default
is no, but should probably be fixed anyway, lest someone get confuse
one get confused when
they try to set it to yes!
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "Luca Olivetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "info-cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject:
Jay Levitt wrote:
I forgot to CC you on this question...
Strange, I didn't see this message on info-cyrus, anyway:
Also, the reason I discovered this is that Mandrake's "msec"
security-auditing process automatically chowns /usr/sieve to root.root
several times a day. Luca, do you think this is so
Spake Hank Beatty on 30/10/2002, 14:52:29 -0500:
> I seem to be having the same problem, but don't understand your solution.
> What do you mean "running out of entophy" and do you know how to fix it?
I believe he means 'entropy'. And fixing it depends on your OS.
FreeBSD users can try vmstat -i t
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Dor S. wrote:
[ you posted this to the sasl list, I'm cc-ing this to the info cyrus list
instead. ]
> Hey again,
> Now I installed Berkeley DB 3.3.11 and I get a new compiling error:
>
> ### Making all in /root/cyrus-imapd-2.0.16/perl/imap
> make[2]: Entering directory `/
At 12:48 AM 04/10/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 07:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Anthony Brock schrieb am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:19:28PM -0700:
> >> > Where would you find this patch?
> >>
> >> Mmmh, maybe my post was a littly fast - I was sure I saw it flying
>
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 07:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anthony Brock schrieb am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:19:28PM -0700:
> > Where would you find this patch?
>
> Mmmh, maybe my post was a littly fast - I was sure I saw it flying around
> somewhere. However, you may begin with
>
> http://www.s
Anthony Brock schrieb am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:19:28PM -0700:
> Where would you find this patch?
Mmmh, maybe my post was a littly fast - I was sure I saw it flying around
somewhere. However, you may begin with
http://www.surf.org.uk/downloads/HIERSEP-r2.patch
but that seems to apply to 2.
Where would you find this patch?
Tony
At 11:00 PM 04/09/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Russell schrieb am Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:29:56PM +0100:
> >> Ok, after much hunting finally discovered its not implemented in
> >2.0.16. Ooops.
>
>There exists a patch to have it in 2.0.16.
>
>
>
>Birger
*
Russell schrieb am Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:29:56PM +0100:
> Ok, after much hunting finally discovered its not implemented in 2.0.16. Ooops.
There exists a patch to have it in 2.0.16.
Birger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kenigson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christopher Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Info Cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: cyrus info list
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Fw: cyrus info list
>
>
> > I forgot to mention that you check /etc/cyrus.conf to make sure Sieve is
> > enabled. The following is my own /etc/cyrus.conf file. Yours may vary
> > d
Yeah, we've got an exactly identical entry in our /etc/cyrus.conf file. I'm
stumped.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Kenigson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:32 AM
Sub
> From: "Christopher Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Matt Kenigson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Info Cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: cyrus info list
>
>
> > Is Siev
on" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Info Cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: cyrus info list
> Is Sieve running? RH 7.2 does not have the sieve port defined in
> /etc/services by default, so unless you edit that file, Sieve
Is Sieve running? RH 7.2 does not have the sieve port defined in
/etc/services by default, so unless you edit that file, Sieve will not
work. I'm using the cyrus-imapd-2.0.16-2rm RPM from
http://rmrpms.tripod.com/cyrus-imapd.
Chris
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Matt Kenigson wrote:
> Incidentally, this
You'll find it at:
http://www.surf.org.uk
Tarjei
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Devdas Bhagat
> Sent: 24. mai 2001 07:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fw:
>
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2001,
Devdas Bhagat wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Michael Fair spewed into the ether:
>
> > 1. Use the patch to make cyrus-sasl auth via ldap possible. I never
> > managed to get cyrus to do things via sasl -> pam.
> Can someone point me to the location of this patch?
>
www.surf.org.uk
--
Simo
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Michael Fair spewed into the ether:
> 1. Use the patch to make cyrus-sasl auth via ldap possible. I never
> managed to get cyrus to do things via sasl -> pam.
Can someone point me to the location of this patch?
Devdas Bhagat
--
Getting kicked out of the American Bar Associat
Hy!
On 21-May-2001 Amos Gouaux wrote:
> nj> I think the file close should be equal to a sync. Am I right?
>
> not necessarily.
Ok, I'll fix it.
> nj> with 300'000 folders, and 4-5000 active users (daily). Cross your fingers
> ;)
>
> perhaps your users are the ones that should cross their
> On Mon, 21 May 2001 17:53:34 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> So far, so good ;)
that's good.
nj> To think of it, maybe Berkeley DB could be used. It might even be better... if
nj> you can specify it the amount of cache memory to use.
just doing a qui
> On Mon, 21 May 2001 10:45:14 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> You might be right, but fsync() might not be needed.
why gamble on something so crucial? this is inviting disaster.
nj> I think the file close should be equal to a sync. Am I right?
not
Hy!
You might be right, but fsync() might not be needed.
The program deals with the files as follows:
- At the start, mailbox.base and mailbox.ext are opened for reading,
then the program reads all the data, and closes the files.
- 99.9% of the time, the program serves everything from mem
I think this is really interesting work. I haven't looked at the
implementation but have considered this basic idea several times; I
think it's definitely worth the work.
A random comment on your message:
The mailbox.ext file is always "small", so writing to it should be
fast, and you co
Ok, I think I know the problem here. The default pwcheck method from the
rpm was PAM. However, PAM has a restriction that users besides root may
not make password comparisons against any passwords except their own.
Hence, since the IMAP server runs as Cyrus, it cannot go through PAM to
verify any
--On Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:24 PM +0200 "Poliak, Uwe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wisely declaimed:
> 1.) User unknown
> When the user doesn't exist, sendmail doesn't return the normal "User
> unknown" error message. Instead, sendmail returns "Data format error".
> Below, you find an sniplet from the
>
> 1.) User unknown
> When the user doesn't exist, sendmail doesn't return the normal "User
> unknown" error message. Instead, sendmail returns "Data format error".
> Below, you find an sniplet from the maillog file:
>
> Apr 25 12:56:39 msheas02a sendmail[9082]: MAA09082: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTE
48 matches
Mail list logo
