Hy!
On 21-May-2001 Amos Gouaux wrote:
> nj> I think the file close should be equal to a sync. Am I right?
>
> not necessarily.
Ok, I'll fix it.
> nj> with 300'000 folders, and 4-5000 active users (daily). Cross your fingers
> ;)
>
> perhaps your users are the ones that should cross their fingers.
So far, so good ;)
> personally, i don't know why berkeley db still couldn't be used for
> robustness of data. just having this daemon cache this data in
> memory should in itself be a significant performance boost.
To think of it, maybe Berkeley DB could be used. It might even be better... if
you can specify it the amount of cache memory to use.
But hey, this is also what mb-daemon is about! The daemon side is like a
plug-in, you can have a "text file daemon", a Berkeley DB daemon or an
SQL-daemon, with modifications and compilation only needed on the daemon side,
not on the IMAPd side.
| Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.johnzero.hu |
| "Expect the unexpected!" | ICQ# 4547866 | Linux rulez! |
