I keep a plastic shrunken head and a voodoo rattle in my toolbox.
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 05:38, Kiarna Boyd wrote:
> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will receive a fabulo
Amos Gouaux wrote:
>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:38:25 -0500,
>>Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
>>
>
>kb> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
>kb> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
>kb> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:38:25 -0500,
> Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
kb> I don't think you're paranoid, well, overly.
kb> All my servers are named very carefully, and get their own engineers(a.k.a toy).
kb> My newest cyrus server(thoth) will receive a fabulous lifelike toy
D]
Subject: Re: mailboxes, db or flat
>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:34:47 +0200 (EET),
>>>>> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:
lh> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
lh> hesitation of using BerkeleyD
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:34:47 +0200 (EET),
> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:
lh> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
lh> hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
lh> 32000 lines in the mailboxes file.
I think
Leena Heino schrieb am Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:34:47PM +0200:
> We are consider upgrading Cyrus IMAP from 1.6.25 to 2.1.1. I have some
> hesitation of using BerkeleyDB with mailboxes. We currently have around
> 32000 lines in the mailboxes file.
>
> What kind of problems has there been with Berke
