--On Monday, March 22, 2004 13:22:52 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
User
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 17:18:39 -0800 Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About a week ago, I started a thread explaining my attempts to
use ACL's on shared folders and bulletin boards using Postfix.
I explained in the thread that I could not get ACL's to work
correctly with specfic
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 16:30:54 -0500 Scott Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, the aliases for postmaster and mailer-daemon are as follows:
postmaster: root+postmaster
mailer-daemon: root+mailer-daemon
The problem is that the mail isn't going *to* Mailer-Daemon, it is
comin
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 14:22:33 -0600 Robert Covell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I too would be interested in the question about "abnormal amount of emails
to postmaster". We get about 15K a day of these and just recently started
to pipe them into /dev/null. It is more of a burden to del
--On Monday, December 15, 2003 15:16:51 + Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be possible for the list administrator, to force the adding of
something like [cyrus] into the subject line for all mail reflected from
this list ?
I get quite a lot of mail, other lists do this & I fi
--On Friday, December 05, 2003 09:25:38 -0800 Erik Myllymaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using Exim as my SMTP server and looking at the logs more carefully, it
is Exim that errors with "550 - Unknown User".
Make sure you don't have check_local_user set in the Exim router
that handles these ma
--On Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:11:41 -0600 Jerry Haltom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you all use to properly filter out this mailing list in your
setups? Messages coming through it have no List-Id... and not all of
them have info-cyrus in the To field... Something unique im missing?
As
--On Monday, November 03, 2003 16:44:16 -0800 Jason Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was curious if anyone was running Cyrus on a FreeBSD system? I'm
strongly considering running cyrus for our mail server here and I noticed
that is currently available via the ports tree for FreeBSD.
I would
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 15:35:08 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 14:53:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not sure how the vacation functionality is implemented; but if it
goes through your normal MTA inste
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 14:53:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt I'll attempt to add that functionality, the simple work around
here is put everyone's login in LDAP as an additional email address.
I'm sure it wouldn't be well received, it's sort of a dicey idea.
Certainly open to ab
--On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 09:45:18 AM -0700 "Kevin P. Fleming"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To each his own... These sites have no "more knowledgeable" users, and
don't have any intentions of using any MUAs beyond Outlook Express. In
another situation, sure, what you're describing makes sens
--On Wednesday, October 01, 2003 18:49:12 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003, Wil Cooley wrote:
In common parlance, we have the MTA, the LDA, and the MUA, but we don't
seem to have a name or TLA for the layer between the LDA and the
MUA--the POP or IM
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 22:12:04 +0300 Tuuli K Tuominen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, very good. How do your users create their sieve scripts then? I assume
you have some basic ways of creating filters and then more advanced
users can create their own scripts? Do your users use Websieve
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 21:45:11 +0300 Tuuli K Tuominen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have a simple sieve web interface for creating a filter
for spam-tagged messages? We'll be tagging spam messages with a
"X-Spam-Status: Yes" header or somesuch and now I'm looking for an
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:32:56 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've yet to be able to come up with a sieve rule that will allow me to
filter all "garbage" subjects to a seperate folder ... you know the ones
that look like:
Subject: =?euc-kr?q?(=B1=A4=B0=ED)=B5=F0=
Are there any tools for the mail admin to use to edit, or at least
view, annotations on messages and mailboxes/folders?
Thanks,
-Pat
--On Friday, September 26, 2003 16:26:18 -0700 "Denis V. Suhanov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PL> There is one other thing that may or may not be an issue. Do you
have a sieve script activated for your INBOX ? No, I do not have any
sieve script activated. timsieved is running on the system though
--On Friday, September 26, 2003 15:18:30 -0700 "Denis V. Suhanov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then rjs3+foo will file into user.rjs3.foo
I tried that and added the "p" right (lam user.* anyone p)
Was that a typo? It should have been 'sam', not 'lam' to change
the acl. Once you've changed th
--On Thursday, September 25, 2003 15:14:34 -0400 Etienne Goyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have 'sasl_mech_list: PLAIN DIGEST-MD5'. When doing CAPABILITY, I
have AUTH=DIGEST-MD5, but not AUTH=PLAIN. I think that Cyrus imapd does
not advertise PLAIN, even if he accept it. If I sniff the connec
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 15:57:32 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I periodically fetch mail from my ISP via fetchmail and sort it into my
IMAP box via sieve. For some reason (reiserfs is crap?) it sometimes
happens that cyrus needs to recover DB and it not available during this
time - b
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 01:45:12 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm fairly certain that rfc2821 allows the initial mta to remove the
return-path header if it exists, so it is not incorrect to send the entire
message file when re-injecting the message.
Allowing an MTA t
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 09:30:52 -0400 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
I thought you said above that sieve runs before the 200 result. So
arguably, the message hasn't been -completely- recieved by lmtp until
sieve is fi
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 21:58:03 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
Just because lmtp is linked to sieve is no reason to assume that they are
(or should be) functionally intertwined.
I never claimed that they should be. I
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 23:11:25 -0400 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All messages that hit a sieve-compiled LMTPd are "processed by sieve" even
if that processing is just "hey, look, there isn't a sieve script for this
user... moving on..."
Which is what I suspected; and part
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 17:55:42 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My measurements were not scientific. I'm sure that I overestimated the
count of messages by some factor. My point was that envelope-to does not
seem to be in wide use.
All you've managed to prove is that y
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 13:36:18 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 02:18:50 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> out of ~40,000 messages I've got handy, betwee
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 02:18:50 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 22:40:00 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep mentioning Envelope-To because 30+ years of Software
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 22:40:00 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
Return-Path doesn't exist at all until final delivery, at which point, I
believe it is optional.
from RFC2821 (which, I realize, is smtp and not lmtp)
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 00:01:54 -0700 Andrew Morgan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds to me like the return-path header should be added when the
message is delivered to its final resting place. When sieve is looking at
the message, it hasn't been delivered yet. A sieve script may d
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 19:32:07 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why? Return-Path is clearly a header. What's special about it as opposed
to Subject or Date or From or anything else?
It's not a standard header, as such. Subject, Date, From, and most other
headers are wr
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 19:02:11 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
Can't you get what you want using the "envelope" extension?
Probably. "But..." the rules are being generated by smartsieve. Rel
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 18:08:23 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From what I can tell, ...
While there may not be much call to match against the last-hop received
header (unless maybe you want to take different actions depending on the
origin of mail from different remote
--On Wednesday, September 17, 2003 00:29:03 +0200 "Oliver Demetz -
Hardware-XPress.de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Normally, when sending a mail, a copy of that mail is kept locally on
my pc in Sent-Folder.
What I'd like to realize is, that a copy of that sent mail is stored
in a subfolder 'Sent'
I'm trying to define a macro holding a short multi-condition ACL
statement in Exim 4.22; but I can't seem to get it to do the
linebreaks properly. If it is possible at all, what would be
the syntax to put the following ACL into a macro? (If I can
get this simple case to work, it should be possibl
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 23:11:19 +0200 Miham KEREKES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to set up cyrus-imap with exim4. Exim4 does smtp-time virus
and spamscan, and then calls cyrdeliver with arg username.
The only error is, that cyrdeliver always complaining about:
"Message contains
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 09:50:43 -0700 Ted Cabeen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why does it need to run 5 times? If you've got 5 people with
different settings, you can run spamassassin one time and still have
individual preferences. The score of a message is not determined by a
user's SA
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 09:44:52 -0700 Mike Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, run sasldblistusers2 to verify that you have an entry in the
database.
There appears to be no users in the database. This will be fixed
shortly.
Hmm. I seem to remember that there used to be some problem
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 21:08:25 -0400 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no /etc/sasldb file. There is a /usr/local/etc/sasldb2 file
and the result of the 'file' command on it yields:
sasldb2: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 8, native byte-order)
I compiled cyrus-imapd2
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 20:35:53 -0500 Adi Linden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Cyrus supports server-side filtering via Sieve. This includes filing
messages into folders, vacation responses, and more. Read the docs for
details. There are a handful of Web interfaces (eg, Websieve) for
managi
--On Sunday, July 13, 2003 11:11:09 -0400 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
In particular, is there any clean method for an MTA like exim to
determine whether a given local part is deliverable via the Cyrus
lmtpd? (Or, more accurately, wo
--On Sunday, July 13, 2003 15:20:46 -0700 "Kevin P. Fleming"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Exim 4.20 has (almost) what is needed to do this now. It can already do
SMTP callouts to verify recipients. It can also LMTP callouts, as long
you aren't using LMTP AUTH for delivery to Cyrus. I am using LMTP
--On Sunday, July 13, 2003 13:22:15 -0700 Jason Fesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've thought of that; but it really needs to be run whenever a mailbox
is created or destroyed. Or at least when a shared mailbox or user's
I'm perhaps biased; I assumed only checking the username componant and not
--On Sunday, July 13, 2003 11:24:50 -0700 Jason Fesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Just occasionaly dump a list of users, and feed it into the MTA's favorite
format. Or do it after "newuser" gets ran. Or whatever frequency/event
makes sense.
I've thought of that; but it really needs to be run wh
--On Saturday, July 12, 2003 08:12:55 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Pat Lashley wrote:
What does lmtpd do when presented with an address which includes detail
notation for a sub-mailbox that doesn't exist?
Assume that there are mailboxs 'user.mumble.inbox&#x
I've been using Cyrus with Exim for several years now; and am, in
general quite happy with the combination. I'm currently upgrading
a couple of systems to more current versions; and would really like
to clean up a few of the kluges I've been using.
In particular, is there any clean method for an M
What does lmtpd do when presented with an address which includes detail
notation for a sub-mailbox that doesn't exist?
Assume that there are mailboxs 'user.mumble.inbox', 'user.mumble.foo',
and 'user.mumble.foo.bar'. When lmtpd is presented with the address
'mumble+foo.bar', it will deliver to use
--On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 03:25:54 PM -0500 Casey West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2001 at 12:08 -0500, Lawrence Greenfield took the soap box and
> proclaimed: : The spec isn't clear about whether subscriptions should
> follow the : mailbox or the name. Mark Crispin generally
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 07:40:16 PM -0500 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Right. Which means that they will be duplicated and must be kept
>> in sync for as long as you have apps using both versions. Changing
>> your password in either database won't automatically change it
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 03:49:59 PM -0500 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any
>> > secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format.
>> > This will require resetting all of the users passwords b
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 01:54:11 PM -0500 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyrus users,
>
> We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said
> this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it
> dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do thi
--On Wednesday, November 07, 2001 04:36:59 PM -0500 Lawrence Greenfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>That fixed the DIGEST-MD5 problem; but it seems to have broken PLAIN.
>Now DIGEST-MD5, CRAM-MD5, and LOGIN all work; but PLAIN returns:
>
> S: A01 NO bad protocol / ca
--On Tuesday, November 06, 2001 05:08:21 PM -0500 Lawrence Greenfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:49:06 -0500
>From: Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>This is a known bug in Cyrus IMSP version 1.6a3; it also affects
>GSSAPI. We should release an
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 4.4 system which has been running cyrus-imapd
2.0.16 with cyrus-sasl 1.5.24 using sasldb for authentication.
Now I'm trying to add imspd v1.6a3. The build and install went
fairly smoothly; but when I try imtest, it reports authentication
errors when I try PLAIN or DIGEST-MD5
53 matches
Mail list logo
