--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 09:30:52 -0400 Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:

I thought you said above that sieve runs before the 200 result.  So
arguably, the message hasn't been -completely- recieved by lmtp until
sieve is finished.

The message has been recieved, but not accepted.

I did say 'arguably'. I really don't have strong feelings about whether lmtpd makes its Received header available to sieve or not. The main issue is the Return-Path; which should not (visibly) exist until the message is placed into the mailbox.



Sieve implementations are not required to implement the envelope
extention.

I didn't mean to imply that they were. But a procmail-type interface makes it unreasonably difficult to do so cleanly.

           Local delivery agents similar to procmail have been used for
quite some time.  They're certainly not high performance, but they're far
from obsolete.

Again, I didn't mean to imply that they were obsolete; only that better interfaces to that functionality have evolved. I would base any stand-alone filtering system on the newer mechanisms rather than hanging them on the old .forward system.



-Pat

Reply via email to