Kevin Baker wrote:
What about procmail? Doesn't it have a global script feature?
Don't know, its been a while since I used procmail. The problem with
using procmail is that you're adding yet another forked process to
message delivery.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Enginee
sieve/test.c has:
static int test_comparator(void)
{
struct testcase *t;
int didfail = 0;
for (t = tc; t->comp != NULL; t++) {
comparator_t *c = lookup_comp(t->comp, t->mode, -1, NULL);
int res;
char *mode;
struct testcase is:
struct testcase
What about procmail? Doesn't it have a global script feature?
We've been using sieve, and have some funky scripts to
keep add our global rules to all the accounts. I'd much
rather have the global script though.
-Kevin
> Jason Jacobsen wrote:
>
>> I was wondering what the status is on the featur
Jamie Davey wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to get a script (derived from the archives of this list)
running that will deliver a warning mail to users who are in danger of
breaching / have breached their mailbox quota. The script determines the
users affected by running the quota command and then trie
Jason Jacobsen wrote:
I was wondering what the status is on the feature mentioned in this thread.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17588.html
Nothing had changed since the cited thread.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-89
> > phoenix> sam user.kduke jdrake all
> > setaclmailbox: jdrake: lrswipcda: System I/O error
>
> Is the mailbox missing on the disk? You may need to reconstruct it before
> you delete it (it appears to be damaged).
>
> -Rob
Yes. Apparently it was and that was exactly what I needed to hear to fin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Jay Drake wrote:
phoenix> sam user.kduke jdrake all
setaclmailbox: jdrake: lrswipcda: System I/O error
Is the mailbox missing on the disk? You may need to reconstruct it before
you delete it (it appears to be damaged).
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> dm user.kduke
>
> you mean?
>
> Probably even
>
> sam user.kduke (your admin user) all
> dm user.kduke
>
> -Rob
Thanks for the response, I did indeed mean dm user.kduke (which I realized
shortly after sending my initial email) but I am still running into troubles
per the following session:
phoe
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Kevin Baker wrote:
- Aren't 2 cheap serv's w/ HA better than one
better server as a single point of failure?
Before the Aggregator support, splitting a userbase between servers was
very difficult if you had any shared mailboxes. Now that there is the
aggregator support , it
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Jay Drake wrote:
phoenix> lm
INBOX (\HasNoChildren) user.lstoeckmann (\HasNoChildren)
mshoemaker (\HasNoChildren) user.mkenning (\HasNoChildren)
user.acordell (\HasNoChildren) user.mshoemaker (\HasNoChildren)
user.ahudson (\HasNoChildren) user.ph
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Hello. I have cyrus imapd runing now on my server. Today I heard people say
when the user number exceed 5000+ the cyrus proformance drops in the way that
unless many partitions ware made (what partition? file system partition?) to
share the load. I'm pretty
On 11:50:02 am 06/09/04 "Kevin Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for you reply Jason.
>
> Have you had any instances where you have needed the
> failover?
Not yet :)
> Are you using IP takeover to the synced mailstore or just
> using the rsync as a backup solution?
Just as a backup for
On the "real" scsi hard RAID, I agree but...
For those of us currently using Managed hosting, IDE
drives might be the only option up front. While hardware
RAID and SCSI are with out a doubt *much* better...
the following makes sense to me:
- IDE soft RAID server handles 3000 users NP
- it slows a
I am a newby to, but learning.
Couple things.
"what partition? file system.." This was likely referring
to user partitioning. As your user base increases an
alternative to beefing up your server, is to add addition
machines to handle the load and partition the users.
Basically setting up maildrop
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Jamie Davey wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to get a script (derived from the archives of this list)
> running that will deliver a warning mail to users who are in danger of
> breaching / have breached their mailbox quota. The script determines the
> users affected by running
Thanks for you reply Jason.
Have you had any instances where you have needed the
failover?
Are you using IP takeover to the synced mailstore or just
using the rsync as a backup solution?
Rsync makes sense to me, but when I posted a few people
seems to say DRBD was a better way to go. I think I'
Just posting this for a heads up. Not a question, just info.
We just switched from "Cyrus deliver" to "LMTP" transport.
from: mail_transport=cyrus
to: mail_transport=lmtp
Once we reached about 600 user we were having problems with:
- corrupt mailboxes (needed to be reconstructed)
- cyrus deliver
I was wondering what the status is on the feature
mentioned in this thread.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17588.html
Jason JacobsenDesktop Support AnalystGreat
Plains Locating ServiceOffice: (402) 778-3025 Cell: (402)
960-3656
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently running cyrus-sasl 2.1.17, cyrus-imap 2.2.3, openldap
> 2.2.4 which was working fine and still is for a single domain.
>
You need to get saslauthd from cvs and run saslauthd -r -a ldap
> Now I've added a second domain
Zitat von Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello. I have cyrus imapd runing now on my server. Today I heard people
> say when the user number exceed 5000+ the cyrus proformance drops in the
> way that unless many partitions ware made (what partition? file system
> partition?) to share the load.
Hi,
I'm currently running cyrus-sasl 2.1.17, cyrus-imap 2.2.3, openldap
2.2.4 which was working fine and still is for a single domain.
Now I've added a second domain I have it a authentication problem.
My mailboxes are named as follows:-
Mwheldon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem sh
I'm really not sure what's wrong here or why, but I seem to have users who
only partially exist. I went into cyradm to remove some of our old users who
are no longer with us and unable to create one user which is not listed when
I issue the lm command, per the following:
phoenix> lm
INBOX (\HasNoC
Hello. I have cyrus imapd runing now on my server. Today I heard people
say when the user number exceed 5000+ the cyrus proformance drops in the
way that unless many partitions ware made (what partition? file system
partition?) to share the load. I'm pretty newbie on mail server
administration,
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Andrew J Caird wrote:
> Hello all,
> We are planning on migrating a UW IMAP server to Cyrus IMAP (2.2.5), and
> I have some questions about client configuration; not exactly a Cyrus
> questions, but perhaps someone here has dealt with this before.
>
> 1. Apple's Mail.app do
I am getting this error trying to configure cyrus 2.1.5 on my fedora
core 2 server. I know I have cyrus-sasl installed with the libraries,
yet this error is occurring. I have looked through the archives of this
list and found no answers. Anyone have a definitive fix for this problem?
---
Cyr
Hi all
I am trying to get a script (derived from the archives of this list)
running that will deliver a warning mail to users who are in danger of
breaching / have breached their mailbox quota. The script determines the
users affected by running the quota command and then tries to send them
a m
Simon Matter wrote:
Hm, okay, 2.0.19. Two questions
1) Does your postfix run chrooted? check /etc/postfix/master.cf to find
out.
I have checked the master.cf.
None of the postfix programs run chrooted.
2) Is your postfix user member of the mail group?
I am afraid not.
Add i
>
>>Hm, okay, 2.0.19. Two questions
>>
>>1) Does your postfix run chrooted? check /etc/postfix/master.cf to find
>> out.
>>
>>
> I have checked the master.cf.
> None of the postfix programs run chrooted.
>
>>2) Is your postfix user member of the mail group?
>>
>>
>>
> I am afraid not.
Add it, beca
Hm, okay, 2.0.19. Two questions
1) Does your postfix run chrooted? check /etc/postfix/master.cf to find out.
I have checked the master.cf.
None of the postfix programs run chrooted.
2) Is your postfix user member of the mail group?
I am afraid not.
Simon
Would you please explain why I hav
> Yes, i am using cyrus deliver instead of LMTP.
> And the setting in main.cf is
> mailbox_transport = cyrus
>
> I just try to change it to mailbox_transport =
> lmtp:unix:/var/imap/sockect/lmtp
> And send a message again.
> It also could not be received.
> Then i have checked the mail queues with
Simon Matter wrote:
Hi, all.
I want to add the virtual domain supported to my Cyrus-IMAP server.
And i have followed the docs with the Distribution
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/install-virtdomains.html
First i changed my imapd.conf to:
Which version of cyrus are you using?
Th
31 matches
Mail list logo
