What's better or new in ver 2.1?

2001-09-26 Thread Horst Lederhaas
Hello ! I've heard much from the new Cyrus 2.1, but what's new or better in this version? Are there more features? Where can i read something about ver. 2.1? Thnx Horst -- Horst Lederhaas, IT - Management SEIDEL Elektronik GmbH. Frauentalerstr. 100 8530 Deutschlands

Eudora and ssl/tls and cyrus

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Simicich
I did some searches in the archives. If there is anything similar, searching on Eudora and ssl or tls didn't find it. Eudora will not complete TLS negotiation with Cyrus. I am running Redhat Roswell (the current Redhat Beta, 7.1+) on an Intel box. I am running cyrus-imapd-2.0.15-HIERSEP-r2,

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 09/26/01 07:09 PM, Ken Murchison sat at the `puter and typed: > > all p > > this *should* be 'anyone', NOT 'all' as has been stated before. THHWWAACK!! (a good wack upside the head) You know, I just can't even tell you how *mortified* I am that I could make such a STUPID mistake! I mea

Re: +'d users with sendail + cyrus imap 2.0.15 ...

2001-09-26 Thread Roland Pope
I'm not sure if you've solved this yourself yet or not, but I removed the @ flag from the local mailer and this error went away - Original Message - From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cyrus Info Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 12:47 AM Su

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > On 09/27/01 08:32 AM, Jeremy Howard sat at the `puter and typed: > > Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > What the heck happened to my leblanc+root? It looks like lmtp is > > > dropping it! What gives? > > > > > > BTW, if no one remembers from a previous post, I have built this

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 09/27/01 08:32 AM, Jeremy Howard sat at the `puter and typed: > Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > What the heck happened to my leblanc+root? It looks like lmtp is > > dropping it! What gives? > > > > BTW, if no one remembers from a previous post, I have built this on > > FreeBSD 4.3, from the ports -

Re: Can't deliver to INBOX.folder

2001-09-26 Thread Jeremy Howard
Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Here is what I have in that conf: > SERVICES { > # add or remove based on preferences > imap cmd="imapd" listen="imap" prefork=0 > imaps cmd="imapd -s" listen="imaps" prefork=0 > pop3 cmd="pop3d" listen="pop3" prefork=0 > pop3s cmd

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Jeremy Howard
Louis LeBlanc wrote: > What the heck happened to my leblanc+root? It looks like lmtp is > dropping it! What gives? > > BTW, if no one remembers from a previous post, I have built this on > FreeBSD 4.3, from the ports - default build as defined by the port > maintainer. > Can you show the exact o

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 09/26/01 03:47 PM, Ken Murchison sat at the `puter and typed: > . . . > > I would try running: > > deliver -l (that lower-case L) > as cyrus and doing: > > LHLO foo > MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RCPT TO: IGNOREQUOTA > DATA > From: foo > To: leblanc > Subject: a test > > just a test > .

RE: lmtpdengine.c

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Ustinov
Yeah, well, the thing is that most of the users who are overquoted will never ever come back anymore. I have a system with >100k users, so you can imagine whats going on if I collect overquote e-mails. I guess hotmail.com sends them back immidetely as well. Nick. -Original Message- From:

Re: lmtp delivery problems...

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
"David W. Jablonski" wrote: > > On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 11:50, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > > "David W. Jablonski" wrote: > > > > > > Cyrus Imapd 1.6.24 > > > Sendmail 8.12.0 > > > Cyrus-sasl 1.5.24 > > > > > > You didn't mention anything about your sendmail config. Have you set up > > sendma

Re: lmtpdengine.c

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Nick Ustinov wrote: > > Concerning previous msgs --- the problem was that I've modified > lmtpdengine.c and changed > > 452 4.2.2 Over quota > > to > > 550 4.2.2 Over quota > > Basically, I always did that since I do not want overquota messages to stay > in queue. However, 2.1.0pre didn't l

Re: lmtp delivery problems...

2001-09-26 Thread David W. Jablonski
On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 11:50, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > "David W. Jablonski" wrote: > > > > Cyrus Imapd 1.6.24 > > Sendmail 8.12.0 > > Cyrus-sasl 1.5.24 > > > You didn't mention anything about your sendmail config. Have you set up > sendmail to use LMTP ('z' mailer flag)? If not, this would

Re: AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > Ok, folks. I am *really* getting frustrated on this. I know sendmail > is doing its job, ditto procmail. Any delivery from the command line > using deliver fails to get in its correct place. And I am taking into > consideration the duplicate delivery suppression - o

Re: Which versio to upgrade to?

2001-09-26 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ken Murchison wrote: > I can't speak for Rob, but I don't think Cyrus IMAP + SASL v2 is ready > for primetime just yet. Right now the main thing that is blocking it is some more testing, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking to run it on a production system. > > Are

lmtpdengine.c

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Ustinov
Concerning previous msgs --- the problem was that I've modified lmtpdengine.c and changed 452 4.2.2 Over quota to 550 4.2.2 Over quota Basically, I always did that since I do not want overquota messages to stay in queue. However, 2.1.0pre didn't like this change and now in case of overquota is

AARRGGGHHHHHHH!!!! deliver -> lmtp -> cyrus still not working!

2001-09-26 Thread Louis LeBlanc
Ok, folks. I am *really* getting frustrated on this. I know sendmail is doing its job, ditto procmail. Any delivery from the command line using deliver fails to get in its correct place. And I am taking into consideration the duplicate delivery suppression - of course it still wouldn't even wi

Re: Possible altconfig bug in 2.1CVS (with correct Reply-To: address)

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
"Kevin M. Myer" wrote: > > Sorry about the headers in that last message (if it made it through, > hopefully the list software will reject it because of a wrong From > address) - I have nothing to do with equifax.com. To make a long story > short, I accidentally sent it from a Pine role I had s

[UNIX: /var/imap/socket/lmtp]

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Ustinov
Is it normal, that from some point I see relay=localhost [[UNIX: /var/imap/socket/lmtp]] in my maillog file: Sep 26 19:27:01 satan sendmail[31789]: f8QHR1WN031789: to=root, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=cyrus, pri=30237, relay=localhost [[UNIX: /var/imap/socket/lmtp]], dsn=2.0.0, stat=S

Re: Can't deliver to INBOX.folder

2001-09-26 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 09/26/01 01:51 PM, Jeremy Howard sat at the `puter and typed: > . . . > There's no default rule to override plussed users--this can only occur if > you've specifically added such a rule. If you haven't explicitly played with > Sieve then this is definitely not your problem. > > So I'm all out

Possible altconfig bug in 2.1CVS (with correct Reply-To: address)

2001-09-26 Thread Kevin M. Myer
Sorry about the headers in that last message (if it made it through, hopefully the list software will reject it because of a wrong From address) - I have nothing to do with equifax.com. To make a long story short, I accidentally sent it from a Pine role I had setup to test a procmail rule I had s

Re: Which versio to upgrade to?

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Leena Heino wrote: > > We are now using in Cyrus imap 1.6.25 and Cyrus SASL 1.5.24. > > Due to performance problems we are now considering a version upgrade. > Which version would you recommend using? > Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.24? > Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.27? > Cyrus IMA

just to track...

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Ustinov
Sep 26 16:14:12 satan sendmail[10059]: f8QEDc3x010059: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=34899, class=0, nrcpts=1, m sgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bodytype=8BITMIME, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=alpha.dpunet.lv [159 .148.144.1] Sep 26 16:14:13 satan sendmail[11198]: f8QEECoN011198: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Which versio to upgrade to?

2001-09-26 Thread Leena Heino
We are now using in Cyrus imap 1.6.25 and Cyrus SASL 1.5.24. Due to performance problems we are now considering a version upgrade. Which version would you recommend using? Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.24? Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.27? Cyrus IMAP 2.1pre(CVS) + Cyrus SASL 1.5.24? Cyr

user unknown

2001-09-26 Thread Nick Ustinov
Hey! Recently upgraded to cyrus from cvs (2.1.0pre), it shown a great improvement in lmtpd, however, now I _sometimes randomly_ get the following: >>> DATA <<< 550 4.3.0 System I/O error. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown <<< 503 5.5.1 No recipients In sendmail log file it also show

Re: What is the best way to backup the email boxes in cyrus imap.

2001-09-26 Thread Michael Salmon
On Friday, September 21, 2001 07:40:50 PM +0100 James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +-- | Hello | What is the best way to backup email boxes in cyrus imap? | I have a number IMAP clients connected, and some of them share mail boxes. | Surely, everyone should be disconnected while