Leena Heino wrote:
>
> We are now using in Cyrus imap 1.6.25 and Cyrus SASL 1.5.24.
>
> Due to performance problems we are now considering a version upgrade.
> Which version would you recommend using?
> Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.24?
> Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 + Cyrus SASL 1.5.27?
> Cyrus IMAP 2.1pre(CVS) + Cyrus SASL 1.5.24?
> Cyrus IMAP 2.1pre(CVS) + Cyrus SASL 1.5.27?
> Cyrus IMAP 2.1pre(CVS) + Cyrus SASL 2.x?
I'm not going to make any recommendations, other than to say that I have
been running the current CVS of IMAP 2.1 and SASL 1.5 for weeks/months
on my production server without any problems (other than those caused by
myself while coding).
I can't speak for Rob, but I don't think Cyrus IMAP + SASL v2 is ready
for primetime just yet.
> Are there plans to release an official release in the 2.0.x series after
> the current 2.0.16?
Yes. A beta release will be coming sooner rather than later.
> Are there any serious bugs in 2.0.16 that are fixed in the 2.1pre
> versions?
Nothing *really* serious. 2.1 contains mostly new features and
performance enhancements.
> Are there plans to release official non beta release in the Cyrus
> SASL 1.5.x series after the beta version 1.5.27?
Not to my knowledge.
> Are the any serious bugs with Cyrus SASL 1.5.24 or in Cyrus SASL 1.5.27
> that are fixed in Cyrus SASL 2.x versions?
Not to my knowledge. SASL v2 improves on the API and memory management
of v1.5.
Ken
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
