Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

Dan Kegel wrote: Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Running a serious spam filter on incoming mail is too computationally expensive (there is a lot of mail!) but it is an otherwise good suggestion. Unfortunately I know from my own inbox that a lot of spam these days is specifically designed to get around spa

Re: [Gossip] Mail-Archive uplanned downtime today

BTW do you have ECC-enabled memory on that box? If not, it will probably makes sense to run memtest86 (from www.memtest86.com) for at least few hours on that box (hmm, this will at least be *planned* downtime :). My own linux kernel testing experience tells that the first thing to do after kern

Re: [Gossip] [Spam] mail-address harvested from mail-archive.com

Personally, I vote against removing people's email addresses from pages at mail-archive.com. The thing is email is a kind of universal ID, and if I don't see email, it feels like the message being written by anonymous person. Obfuscating email addresses and other means of fighting email gatherin

Re: [Gossip] Survey: Google AdSense on Mail-Archive?

Jeff Breidenbach пишет: It's not totally clear yet, I don't think Mail-Archive will be able to run ads after all. This is due to the policy of the colocation organization. What if all revenue from adsence at your site will go straight to them? I did go ahead and set up an experimental page to see

Re: [Gossip] renamed list

Dave Holland wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:02:47AM -0600, Earl Hood wrote: See Thanks, that sort of answers my question; I see that mail-archive.com will automatically generate a new, separate archive when the list name changes. So now I have

Re: [Gossip] next anti-spambot steps

Earl Hood wrote: On February 20, 2003 at 11:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb to?) completely censor

[Gossip] arch...@what.domain?

Hello, I remember Jeff said that he will change the 'catch-all-lists' address from 'archive@jab.org' to 'archive@mail-archive.com', as mail-archive will move on to new hardware (which is seems to be done already). In the mail-archive FAQ a new address 'archive@mail-archive.com' is shown, but it

Re: [Gossip] status, mail-archive

Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > 5) Regarding the common "phrase search" feature request, it looks > like htdig 3.2 is nowhere near ready to go, so that's not > happening any time soon. Again, what about giving ASPseek a try? I'm one of developers ;) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ7551596 [EMAIL P

Re: [Gossip] data transfer status

Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > There are still some network details and configuration still left to > do on the new machine, including: > > Mail Transfer Agent [exim] Can you please emphasize on why have you choosen exim? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ7551596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Guinness a Da

Re: [Gossip] search

BTW, I'm the author of aspseek search engine (http://www.aspseek.org/). To me (and to aspseek users, too) aspseek compares to htdig as WWW compares to gopher. I mean it can do a lot more, and faster than ht://Dig. It can do boolean search, phrase search etc. It has a very good relevance of results

Re: [Gossip] YahooGroups banned

Hello, I have just received a message from my majordomo telling that archive@jab.org was unsubscribed from my mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). What happened? Jeff Breidenbach ÐÉÓÁÌ(Á): > > Effective immediately, YahooGroups mailing lists are banned from using > the mail-archive service. This a