2007/3/28, Vladimir Rusinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/28, Vladimir Rusinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
>
> > (Show me `gcc-config -l`)
> >
> Here we go:
> # gcc-config -l
> [1] i386-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 *
>
Hmm, this must be i686, not i 386.
Probably a PEBSAC
If so, that's ok I'm willing to learn. Like the title says, if I log in as
root /root/.bashrc and /root/.bash_profile are sourced. However if I login
as BYoung and am authenticated by the NIS server (SFU on aWindows Domain
Controller), then /home/BYoung/.bash_profile and /home/BY
I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I think
umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/3/28, Vladimir Rusinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Show me `gcc-config -l`)
>
Here we go:
# gcc-config -l
[1] i386-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 *
Hmm, this must be i686, not i386.
Have you ever change CHOST in /etc/make.conf ?
--
WBR, Vladimir
2007/3/28, Vladimir Rusinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /bin/sh: i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar: command not found
> CC applets/busybox.o
> /bin/sh: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: command not found
>
Seems like you have updated gcc, pruned old version a
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/bin/sh: i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar: command not found
CC applets/busybox.o
/bin/sh: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: command not found
Seems like you have updated gcc, pruned old version and not used gcc-config.
(Show me `gcc-config -l`)
--
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Busybox update fail':
> I'm truing to update my Gentoo box, ut its failed on busybox.
>
> My info
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
> CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>
> My error:
> /bin/sh:
Hello list!
I'm truing to update my Gentoo box, ut its failed on busybox. So what I have:
My info
# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.2.2 (default-linux/x86/no-nptl, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r0,
2.6.19-gentoo-r5-work i686)
=
System uname: 2.6.1
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-user] kmail + sieve':
> Until recently, using managing seive filters in kmail "just worked".
> Unfortunately, now I get an error:
>
> Could not start process Unable to create io-slave:
> klauncher said: U
Until recently, using managing seive filters in kmail "just worked".
Unfortunately, now I get an error:
Could not start process Unable to create io-slave:
klauncher said: Unknown protocol 'sieve'.
whenever I try to manage my sieve rules. Clearly, I must be missing some
kio_slave, but I'm not
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 05:25:28 Grant Edwards wrote:
> Neither one mentions anything about putting environment
> variables in /etc/portange/env//
>
> At least not that I could find...
That's true. For that you have to resort to the gentoo-dev@ archives. Probably
the reason is that the current
On 2007-03-28, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I never did find that in the docs anywhere...
>
> `man 5 ebuild`
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3D2&chap=3D=
> 1#doc_chap2
>=2D-=20
Neither one mentions anything about putting environment
variable
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 22:34:40 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-03-27, Mauro Faccenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Don't forget to disable this modification after you are ready, otherwise
> >> all packages that support the same configure option will be build this
> >> way.
> >
> > better doing
On 2007-03-27, Mauro Faccenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Don't forget to disable this modification after you are ready, otherwise
>> all packages that support the same configure option will be build this way.
>
> better doing it in the command line:
>
> # EXTRA_ECONF="$EXTRA_ECONF --without-ext
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:00:46 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>It has always worked that way for me. I use the pro-audio overlay.
> eix-sync does not update for changes in that overlay so I have to do
> this:
>
> layman -s pro-audio
> eix-sync
>
> and then I see the overlay updates.
>
>It's a
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 16:52, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> > script when building using emerge?
> >
> > Do I have create my own ebuild file?
>
> Just follow Bo's advice:
> Put for example:
>EXTRA_ECONF="$EXTRA_E
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> script when building using emerge?
>
> Do I have create my own ebuild file?
>
>
Just follow Bo's advice:
Put for example:
EXTRA_ECONF="$EXTRA_ECONF --without-ext2undel"
at the end of your /etc/make.conf
Rob Rutherford wrote:
>
>
>
> Indeed!
> Maya + A cluster of PCs + Linux = Star Wars ;-)
>
>
> I noticed you left the word script out of the list. :-D
>
> Rob
Oh, of course! I haven't forgotten all these "little" things that Mr.
Lucas and his team have taken care of to make my favorite mov
If you see that virtual/x11 is masked, this is because it's time to move
to modular xorg. Modular xorg has been in the tree for quite a while
now, and the long-term plan to migrage gentoo away from non-modular xorg
has now been moved to the next step.
You can read how to do exactly this here: http
Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> After today update have found such message (see below). Does it
> meen, we all must wait for all x11-dependant packages maintainers
> to modify plenty ebuild files?
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
> emerge -pvDuN world
>
> These are the packages that would be
Em Terça 27 Março 2007 15:54, Grant Edwards escreveu:
> On 2007-03-27, Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> script when building using emerge?
>
> Do I have create my own ebuild file?
> >>>
> >>> How about the USE flag
On 3/27/07, John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. I have a strange problem. I am using layman and at a point I had
no overlays under layman and now I have added two but portage is
ignoring them. I have at the end of /etc/make.conf
source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf
and that file h
After today update have found such message (see below). Does it
meen, we all must wait for all x11-dependant packages maintainers
to modify plenty ebuild files?
Andrew
emerge -pvDuN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependen
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 20:02:49 Grant Edwards wrote:
> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> script when building using emerge?
>
> Do I have create my own ebuild file?
You can set EXTRA_ECONF="--your_desired_configure_option". Since it's read on
the bash side of portag
Em Terça 27 Março 2007 15:32, Grant Edwards escreveu:
> On 2007-03-27, Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Em Terça 27 Março 2007 15:02, Grant Edwards escreveu:
> >> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> >> script when building using emerge?
> >>
> >> Do I have create my o
On 2007-03-27, Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Terça 27 Março 2007 15:02, Grant Edwards escreveu:
>> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
>> script when building using emerge?
>>
>> Do I have create my own ebuild file?
>
> How about the USE flag?
Which USE flag?
--
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 20:01:16 John covici wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild UD] gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.16.2 [2.18.0] USE="doc
> opengl pam -debug -xinerama" 0 kB
>
> Total: 1 package (1 downgrade), Size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> Now why does portage want to downgrad
Hello,
Does anyone know what controls the keyboard autorepeat rate? This is for
a console without running an X server.
How about for an xterm, is the repeat rate controlled by the Option
"AutoRepeat" "xxx yyy" in xorg.conf?
Thanks,
--
Valmor
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Em Terça 27 Março 2007 15:02, Grant Edwards escreveu:
> Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
> script when building using emerge?
>
> Do I have create my own ebuild file?
>
> --
> Grant Edwards grante Yow! I feel like I'm
>
Is there no way to specify options to a program's "configure"
script when building using emerge?
Do I have create my own ebuild file?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I feel like I'm
at in a Toilet Bowl with a
on Tuesday 03/27/2007 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:48:40 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > This would also happen if your package.keywords entry was incorrect.
> > > eix, after running update-eix, should indicate overlay packages,
> > > even when they hav
Indeed!
Maya + A cluster of PCs + Linux = Star Wars ;-)
I noticed you left the word script out of the list. :-D
Rob
Samir Faci wrote:
> As far as I know the learning edition isn't available for linux, I
> might be wrong.
>
> They do have their commercial version which works great on linux.
> Unlike other company that came out with "linux" versions which turned
> out to be re-wrap of their 1.0 release of their s
Hello mailing list
It s the first time that i send such an email and i don t know if i do
it correctly.Anyway, to my problem:
After an ordinary emerge --sync and emerge -avuDN world i don t have
beryl anymore on my xfce.I don t know what can have changed but i have
to state that i have installed
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:48:40 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > This would also happen if your package.keywords entry was incorrect.
> > eix, after running update-eix, should indicate overlay packages,
> > even when they have the same version number as in the main portage
> > tree.
>
> OK, well
on Tuesday 03/27/2007 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:08:37 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > So what makes you think portage is ignoring them?
>
> > Well, two things, -- I was trying to emerge a package which had a
> > higher version in the overlay and whic
You wrote
> Well, not a very hi-tech solution, but I think that if you find files and
> directories like /usr/portage, /etc/gentoo-release, /etc/make.*, etc.
> you can reasonably assume you are running on gentoo.
Not necessarily number 1 and 3 if you're using paludis.
ralf
--
gentoo-user@ge
2007/3/26, buffalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all! Does anybody know whether there exist some good diary tools under
gentoo linux? I appreciate your help very much!
You could use Emacs and its diary mode. See
http://emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/DiaryMode
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:08:37 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > So what makes you think portage is ignoring them?
> Well, two things, -- I was trying to emerge a package which had a
> higher version in the overlay and which I had put in my
> /etc/portage/package.keywords file, but I got a reinstall o
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 14:08:37 John covici wrote:
> > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage/local/layman/gnome-experimental
> > > /usr/portage/local/layman/mozilla"
> >
> > So what makes you think portage is ignoring them?
>
> Well, two things, -- I was trying to emerge a package which had a
> higher
on Tuesday 03/27/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:41:40 John covici wrote:
> > > > I am using layman and at a point I had no overlays under layman and now
> > > > I have added two but portage is ignoring them. I have at the end of
> > > > /etc/make
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:41:40 John covici wrote:
> > > I am using layman and at a point I had no overlays under layman and now
> > > I have added two but portage is ignoring them. I have at the end of
> > > /etc/make.conf
> > > source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf
> > > and that file has
On Monday 26 March 2007 23:48, Zac Medico wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > I have rebuilt noatune and krec with "-arts" set in make.conf. Does this
> > change the dependencies they have on arts? Or is it "unconditional" in
> > the sense that noatune *always* depends on kde-base/arts no matter what I
> >
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 04:13, Samir Faci wrote:
> As far as I know the learning edition isn't available for linux, I might be
> wrong.
>
> They do have their commercial version which works great on linux. Unlike
> other company that came out with "linux" versions which turned out to be
> re-wrap
On Monday 26 March 2007 23:34, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 23:06 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > I'm convinced that I am too tired to understand this because I noticed
> > I have
> > been missing out words in my response (sorry!). Would you mind
> > simplifying
> > it for me?
>
> Think ab
on Tuesday 03/27/2007 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:16:20 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > I am using layman and at a point I had
> > no overlays under layman and now I have added two but portage is
> > ignoring them. I have at the end of /etc/make.conf
> >
Hi!
I am looking for a bookmark-manager for linux.
It should import/export (at least) firefox and opera bookmarks,
and should be able to synchronize between several browsers on
several machines. Textmode would be cool, as I intend to run it
from a script. Has anybody seen something like
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:16:20 -0400, John covici wrote:
> I am using layman and at a point I had
> no overlays under layman and now I have added two but portage is
> ignoring them. I have at the end of /etc/make.conf
> source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf
> and that file has what it should,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:11:32 +0800, buffalo wrote:
> Yes, and Korganizer is beyond that definition;) Thanks!
Which definition? You still haven't said what kind of diary tool you are
looking for - a record or a plan, looking forwards or backwards?
--
Neil Bothwick
All general statements are fa
Hi,
2007. 03. 27, kedd keltezéssel 11.37-kor buffalo ezt írta:
>
> Using vim seems somewhat not the best way for organizing everyday's
> information together.
Depends on you :)
Normal desktop user prefers the comfortable way, that is why I recommend
Tomboy for you :)
I also use it for ad-hoc no
Hi. I have a strange problem. I am using layman and at a point I had
no overlays under layman and now I have added two but portage is
ignoring them. I have at the end of /etc/make.conf
source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf
and that file has what it should, but portage is not seeing them at
Yes, and Korganizer is beyond that definition;) Thanks!
2007/3/27, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:37:06 +0800, buffalo wrote:
> Thanks for your help! I surely want the diary tool, not a blog ;)
Diary has multiple meanings, are you looking for a daily journal, or
som
Hi,
I've a doubt about emerging perl modules. Is it good to do it with
--oneshot emerge option?
Do I really need to add perl module to my world file?
Is it going to be upgraded when it's needed?
Here are the dependencies for the module (GDGraph)
DEPEND="dev-perl/GDTextUtil
media-libs/gd
but do you have alsasound set to be started in default or boot
runlevel?
maybe it's loading by udev or hotplug? but how to tell'em not to do such
bad things? :)
Well, if you don't need sound switch of sound support in the kernel.
hehe, done. thanks :)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:37:06 +0800, buffalo wrote:
> Thanks for your help! I surely want the diary tool, not a blog ;)
Diary has multiple meanings, are you looking for a daily journal, or
something to organise appointments? Korganizer can do both.
--
Neil Bothwick
Brain fried -- core dumped.
kedd 27 március 2007 10.27 dátummal sbelov ezt írta:
>
> >> i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to sound
> >> modules to be loaded at startup:
> >>
> >> moon ~ # lsmod | grep snd
> >> snd_mpu401 3272 0
> >> snd_mpu401_uart 4000 1 snd_mpu401
> >> sn
Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 schrieb ext sbelov:
> >> i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to
> >> sound modules to be loaded at startup:
> >>
> >> moon ~ # lsmod | grep snd
> >> snd_mpu401 3272 0
> >> snd_mpu401_uart 4000 1 snd_mpu401
> >> snd_rawmidi
i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to sound
modules to be loaded at startup:
moon ~ # lsmod | grep snd
snd_mpu401 3272 0
snd_mpu401_uart 4000 1 snd_mpu401
snd_rawmidi12256 1 snd_mpu401_uart
snd_seq_device 3756 1 snd_rawm
i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to sound
modules to be loaded at startup:
moon ~ # lsmod | grep snd
snd_mpu401 3272 0
snd_mpu401_uart 4000 1 snd_mpu401
snd_rawmidi12256 1 snd_mpu401_uart
snd_seq_device 3756 1 snd_rawmi
Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 schrieb ext sbelov:
> i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to sound
> modules to be loaded at startup:
rc-update del alsasound
HTH...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)2
On 11:45 Tue 27 Mar , sbelov wrote:
>
>
> i have built-in soundcard AC'97 on the server, but i dont want to sound
> modules to be loaded at startup:
>
> moon ~ # lsmod | grep snd
> snd_mpu401 3272 0
> snd_mpu401_uart 4000 1 snd_mpu401
> snd_rawmidi12256 1
On Monday 26 March 2007, sean wrote:
> What I am trying to figure out is why .20 cannot ping and access the
> printer.
>
> Is anyone able to give me some ideas on what to check?
Do you perhaps have an entry in /etc/sysctl.conf that blocks icmp
packets?
Failing that, is an iptables dropping icmp
62 matches
Mail list logo
