Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 15:16 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 19:27 Sun 08 Mar , Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 10:01 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > > > It would just eliminate all but one call to use_with(). Depending on how > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Christian Faulhammer: > Hi, > > Daniel Pielmeier : > > > 2009/3/9 Christian Faulhammer : > > > > > > I don't know if there is a bug somewhere (I did not find one), but > > > what about having the possibility to ask for one out many USE flags > > > o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 23:31 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 21:22 Sun 08 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 23:35 Sun 08 Mar , Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Well, the point I'm trying to make here is a different one: The syntax > > > you pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-13 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 20:11 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:49:16 +0100 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct > > improvements: > > Some more small candidates to discuss: > > *

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Tiziano Müller
Thanks a lot for your work. Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 20:47 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > I've got a very rough draft of what EAPI 3 might end up looking like, > based upon discussion: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > Note that I will probably rebase and modifying the b

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > You forgot to mentioned that we probably also want that > > default_src_configure/src_compile die when they try to `cd` to an > > in

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: > > > Probably this is not best implementation, but it describes idea > > well. If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test > > enabled by default and I'll all for this

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 00:22 +0100 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > Btw, I put up a document explaining the changes in some detail here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/docs/EAPI3.{rst,html} > (including references to bugs if any, etc.) > It is completely based on the spreadsheet we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 20:38 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev > > list to see. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 09:22 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of > "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first > argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the > following are obvious: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Alfredsen: > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug > and where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:26 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks > > > > Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right? > > N

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) ) > > > > What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure. > > The replacement is to write the deps out correctl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 19:12 +0100 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote: > > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS? > > > > DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1]. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Preserving mtimes for EAPI3

2009-03-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Peter Alfredsen: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:40:14 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > No, an EAPI bump is necessary. Older (post-EAPI) Portage versions do > > something different, so any ebuild relying upon particular behaviour > > is already broken.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Real multilib support for Gentoo

2009-04-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2009, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Thomas Sachau: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support > >> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are main

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 05:25 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp: > Hello, > > > This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item > in EAPI-3 draft. > > The premise is good what := and :* allow for, but I'm concerned about > the syntax possibly ending up being suboptimal in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 04:51 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp: > Hello, > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 08:49 +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of > > new > > problems. One of them are the use dep

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Rémi Cardona: > Mart Raudsepp a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > > > This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item > > in EAPI-3 draft. > > Could anyone actually give a good reason for slot operators? What > packages would ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 23:36 +0530 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > roughly 90% packages depending on one of: > > > > sys-libs/db > > Why the hell does this have so many slots in-tree? I am unaware of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 13:13 -0400 schrieb Richard Freeman: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Most packages that have tests have working tests. For those that don't, > > the tests have to be restricted. All this proposal does is ensures that > > that happens in a progressive, incremental an

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-19 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2009, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > The provisional included feature list is everything that was ready > before the deadline. Thanks a lot for your work. Sor

Re: [gentoo-dev] PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION implicit things (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-20 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 20.04.2009, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > Let's see if we can keep to one thread per item here. > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:14:00 +0200 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > * PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION > > yes, but *_IMPLICIT has to be discussed. &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23

2009-04-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 15:27 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 15:17 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail f

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 7

2009-05-03 Thread Tiziano Müller
s (due to implementation problems). Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 7

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.05.03 22:47, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & > > 4th > > Thursdays at 2000

Re: [gentoo-dev] Retiring

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
and reduce breakages at user-side which hopefully reduces the amount of bugs reported because of such breakages and keep our users happy and happy users are more likely to contribute or become devs when they see some progress. But you're right, we have to find the balance somehow... -- Tiz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 14

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
d 4th Thursday of each month. This is > announced in every meeting email. > > Of course there are occasional exceptions, but they are exceptions and > not the rule. I don't see why this would be one because I haven't heard > anything about next week being bad. Well

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 14

2009-05-06 Thread Tiziano Müller
Updated meeting agenda can be found here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/council/meeting-agenda-20090514.txt Changes: - Added the issue of removing old eclasses to the list. Cheers, Tiziano Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 23:47 +0200 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > This is your friendly reminder! S

Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-1/libusb-compat landing - testing and DEPEND changes needed

2009-05-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
1.4.2.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.4.4.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.4.99.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.5.2.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.5.3.ebuild > sys-apps/usb_modeswitch/usb_modeswitch-0.9.4.ebuild > sys-apps/usbutils/usbutils-0.73.ebuild &

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes

2009-05-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
Do we want to document the following? (do we have already?) - When is it allowed to use an EAPI in the tree (given as offset to the release of portage supporting that eapi) - When is it allowed to use an EAPI in the stable tree (given as offset of when a portage version supporting that EAPI

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The fallacies of GLEP55

2009-05-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
st > starting at the best version and working downwards until it finds > something usable, which is a pretty hefty price to pay. > ... if the cache can be parsed at all. With GLEP-55 we might even choose to change the cache format. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI Changes

2009-05-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 11:11 -0600 schrieb Ryan Hill: > On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:31:25 +0200 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Wrong. For example: > > - stuff like docompress may change the content being installed depending > > on the package manager > > - --disa

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
ng is ultimately visible for a c/p-v. > > I know. > > > > > -- > > Ciaran McCreesh > > > > I am wondering if enabling @overlay postfix support could be just restricted > to command line arguments, at least for the beginning. And then it's a pm thing. So

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
at happens when the Universal Select Tool gets released/used. Possible alternative: app-select? -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
e specified slot. The default > is '*' meaning all slots. [1] I don't think this is really a good idea since the version may or may not be tied to a slot (at the moment it is in most cases I know). Looks good so far. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council M

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
elopment model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 signature.asc Description: Dies i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google SoC @ Gentoo - Universal Select Tool

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
ll can understand, I won't be having the time to > read through all eselect-* modules and *-config utilities code. > > Please drop me a line here or at freenode if you have anything to add to > these ideas or have any further ideas that can help me on this project. > Thank y

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
o repeat myself: herds can already been seen as tags. So, my proposal still stands: change the current herds into teams and write them in metadata.xml as such: cpp and then using as tags. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, Postgre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-27 Thread Tiziano Müller
files: ~50ms 5541 files: ~170ms Reading from cold cache: 1507 files: ~2.8s 5541 files: ~6s I made a lot of assumptions here (neglecting seek between ebuild-dir and metadata-dir, other processes using the drive, 80 ebuilds from overlays where the ebuild would have to be read, etc.). But estimatin

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 54 and hyphens in PV

2009-05-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
hing? > > With our current versioning scheme the rule is very simple: ${P} is > split into ${PN} and ${PV} at the last hyphen. This can be done in a > straight forward way by regexp matching, and I would really hate to > lose this nice property. I don't understand why this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 28.05.2009, 09:23 +0200 schrieb Patrick Lauer: > On Thursday 28 May 2009 07:46:36 Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > And here is why (I'm only looking at the non-degenerated case with valid > > metadata, ignoring overlays which some consider a corner case (I do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
omment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkojWCIACgkQcAWygvVEyAKcBQCgi7CbK2zTX8y/FqDvTUfsN2l4 > ig4AoI6cI1m8dlTXRKtfYyTUfGBMvhZC > =72eQ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibilit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.05.27 13:46, Ferris McCormick wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:57 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > This is your friendly reminder! Same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 12:17 +0200 schrieb Tobias Scherbaum: > And here we go, these are the ones I'd like to nominate: > > * dev-zero, well because ... i'd like him to be on the council again! And I accept the nomination, thank you. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Develo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 22:29 +0200 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > The people I'd like to nominate: > > - dertobi123 ... for his solid comments, experience, common sense, > reliability > - halcy0n ... even though he had to resign early I hope he finds time > again to run for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
we have not > > been doing this for the past several weeks. > > Vigorous debate fails no one. Religious zealotry however fails us all. > In recognizing that this is what's happening iwth EAPI-3, and GLEP's > 54/55 is the first step towards moving on to a new and fair de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
gt; the time to start reviewing candidates and seeing if they will do for > you in the coming year what you expect a council to do. > > If people like this, great. If people don't, then I can feel comforted > that I spoke my piece about what I want to see the council become and &g

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
PI development like feature-freeze, late feature removals (due to implementation problems). Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-10 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th > > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [packagekit] Inviting you to project "PackageMap"

2009-06-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
t use a XML database like dbxml? Maybe you could just specify the XML files as storage and then dbxml would do the rest. > > > > XML might be > > useful for storing the data, but not for querying. > > Good point. Using XPath and XQuery you can do queries on XML as we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

2009-06-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
e: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ > > > Attached is the preliminary meeting agenda. Agenda looks fine, thanks Thomas for taking it over but I simply didn't have time to do it before I left for my holidays. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Membe

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
would show the same averseness to some devs I had fights with in the past as people do to Ciaran I couldn't work with them now. > And experiments sometimes succeed, or sometimes they fail, > but they often teach you something. I wouldn't be as fast as you to > remove Tizian

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2009, 16:40 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.06.28 10:00, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 07:15 -0600 schrieb Denis Dupeyron: > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
ead my 'what if' above with that > > liability in mind. > > > > This is an interesting point that I doubt many here would have thought of. > > > 1. http://twitter.com/dberkholz/status/2345098446 -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Area

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
ntoo you > would have tried your best to be good and nice in the... I dunno, 4 > years(?) since your ejection and then worked your way up to being a > developer again. > > Trying to get into Gentoo by proxy (heh, see what I did there?) is the > wrong way Please read m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-03-31 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 31.03.2012, 14:44 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote: > > > I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable > > is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. > > There is no such stage. You mean pkg_pretend, I s

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: net-fs/mount-cifs

2012-07-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (24 Jul 2012) # Now part of net-fs/cifs-utils & unmaintained by upstream # Security bug #308067 and bugs #427702, #232608, #247809, # #258409, #265183, #337691, #342783, #279074 # Removal in 30 days net-fs/mount-cifs

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch

2012-08-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2012, 01:44 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need > > 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50); > > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-admin/eselect-boost & Boost plans

2012-08-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Some of you may have already noticed, that boost >=1.50.0-r1 does not pull in eselect-boost anymore and does not install a profile for it either. This is on purpose since app-admin/eselect-boost will be removed. Why: the purpose of eselect-boost was to make the introduction of slotted-boost easier

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.

2012-08-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a): > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass > > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > > > +# Copyri

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.

2012-08-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 09:43 +0200 schrieb hasufell: > On 08/28/2012 06:26 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > > There needs to be a way to specify maximal accepted slot of Boost. > > Examples of some possibilities: * BOOST_MAX_SLOT="1.49" global > > variable * '--max 1.49'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost

2012-10-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 11:30 -0700 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: > Given the amount of headaches that Boost seems to give us all, now > thanks to the recent changes even more because Gentoo's boost is > different from all others and no upstream default check seem to work > correctly with it, I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost

2012-10-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 22:48 -0700 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: > On 30/10/2012 22:44, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > I agree. It really doesn't make sense to keep unbuildable stuff in the > > tree. The point of slotting it in the first place was also to force a > > rebui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hardening a default profile

2017-06-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi Michael Am 11.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Michael Brinkman: > Hello, so I've been running Gentoo Hardened for a few years on my > laptop, my desktop, and a server made from an older desktop. > > Because of Grsecurity closing access to its source to non-subscribers, > I decided that I would just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 17.12.2012, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Tomáš Chvátal: > Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to > be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). > > I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for > /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/dv{acm4,net,ssl,thread,util}

2013-03-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (21 Mar 2013) # Masked for removal in 30 days (bug #462590). Open bugs: # #310217, #339477, #343807, #439110 # Recent test failures in dvutil show bugs in timezone handling. # No new release since >3 years, upstream is not responding. # Not recommended for new development. Us

[gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPANDs for uWSGI: UWSGI_LANGUAGES, UWSGI_PLUGINS and plans for uwsgi-2

2013-04-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi everyone, the new versions of uwsgi (1.9+) support even more languages/platforms and plugins. Currently we do everything with common USE flags and build-in many plugins since we didn't want to expose them right from the start to the user (the selection is based on upstreams base configuration)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: > On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then > >

[gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory clickthrough witch the attached text. The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE license group. Objections? ADAPTEC, INC. DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE LICENSE This

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 29.08.2013, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based > > controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead > > > Plea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Akamai secure memory allocator for OpenSSL?

2014-04-14 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am 13.04.2014 22:42, schrieb Joshua Kinard: > So one of the side-discussions happening after Heartbleed was the fact that > OpenSSL has its own memory allocator code that effectively mitigates any C > library-provided exploit mitigations (as discussed on the openbsd-misc ML at > [1] and Ted Unangst

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/amara

2014-08-11 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (10 Aug 2014) # Bundles an old (2.0.0) and vulnerable, but modified version of expat. # Testsuite is completely broken and upstream seems to be working on the # next rewrite instead of fixing this one. Nothing in the tree depends on it. # Removal in a month. dev-python/amara

[gentoo-dev] Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and maybe others as well). Since it isn't save to assume that '-jN' is the only option in MAKEOPTS, some filtering is

[gentoo-dev] Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS respectively) could be added to make.conf > | and used whenever one of those build-systems is being used. But we > | would probably have to ad

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:23:16 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano Müller > | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS re

[gentoo-dev] Book recommendation: "producing open source software" (Chapter 6: "Communications")

2007-06-06 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi everyone I received a book yesterday with the title "producing open source software", written by Karl Fogel. It's also available online for free: http://producingoss.com/ While reading through the latest messages here I thought that I should recommend that book (especially chapter 6) to you.

[gentoo-dev] Re: John Jawed & Alex Tarkovsky's einput eclass

2007-07-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Rémi Cardona schrieb: > As you pointed it out, ebuilds should not be interactive. Imho, adding > an eclass to encourage it is counter-productive. While that's true, there might be a use case in pkg_config. For example postgresql which needs quiet a few parameters to initialize the first database c

[gentoo-dev] Re: John Jawed & Alex Tarkovsky's einput eclass

2007-07-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Steve Long schrieb: > Hi, > A link on bugzilla somehow led me (isn't the web wonderful ;) to this: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/40596 > which appears (to a user) like a really good idea. There is a version still > at: http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/einput.eclass > A newer v

[gentoo-dev] Re: John Jawed & Alex Tarkovsky's einput eclass

2007-07-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Sorry for the "atomic" posts, I should rather first think before hitting the send button :-\ The problem with the proposed einput.eclass is that the user has to use the commandline for that, which is fine for a lot of people. At the moment I'd rather like to see a proposal for an "API" (together

[gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Tiziano Müller
Mike Doty schrieb: > All- > > We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only > devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate > in > bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the > gentoo-project list will be cr

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grab

2007-07-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
> - dev-cpp/Ice (cpp herd ?) cpp will take that one > - dev-util/cflow I'll take that one signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08

2007-07-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
Torsten Veller schrieb: > Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is > on the list right now. > > As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should > take care that the information flows. IMHO the easiest way to achieve this > is electing an infra member to

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION

2007-07-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Petteri Räty schrieb: > Currently there are some ebuilds in the tree that use ${PV} in > description which leads to results like: > Description: Documentation (including API Javadocs) for > Java SDK version 1.6.0 > > I did see anything in devmanual taking a stance on this issue: > htt

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION

2007-07-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Petteri Räty schrieb: > Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:06:40 +0300 >> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> But is there anything that makes use of version specific DESCRIPTION >>> atoms? >> Yep. Have a look at sys-devel/gcc for example. Some versions include >> various

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION

2007-07-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:44:52 +0200 > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make >> it impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some >> duplication. > > Got to be careful he

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION

2007-07-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Petteri Räty schrieb: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186454 In regard to this it makes sense to add a check (but only a warning) to repoman and document it in the devmanual. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION

2007-07-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: > And there aren't specification-compliant Yaml libraries for Ruby, > Python or Perl. That's important. If you're using the thing that Syck > generates, you're not using Yaml. Sorry for starting this off-topic discussion. I'd suggest that we first concentrate on what we wa

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Chris Gianelloni schrieb: - arch-specific patches/dependencies - If someone is requesting KEYWORD changes on a package and it requires a patch or additional dependencies for your architecture, you are not only permitted, but really are required to make the necessary changes to add support for you

[gentoo-dev] Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi everyone, Thanks to an increased number of people who helped with testing and fixing within the last two months, we were able to finally unmask python 2.5 today. On behalf of the Gentoo Python Team, dev-zero signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Status of xcb

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hanno Böck wrote: > Hi, > > With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb. > While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434 > I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make > xcb default? Is

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Thomas Anderson wrote: > Thanks! > Is there any roadmap for stabilizing python-2.5(as in weeks,months, > decades?) ;) Well, I guess we should just apply the usual "30 days rule" here. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Luis Medinas wrote: > Nice to know this, python 2.4 is really broken for us but python 2.5 is > the right thing to do imo. Too bad it took too much to unmask it. Well, finally some good people joined the python-herd and helped with testing and fixing instead of just grumbling around. signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages of for grabs

2007-09-06 Thread Tiziano Müller
Christian Heim wrote: > - dev-util/scons (twp) guess it makes sense when the python project takes this one. > - x11-libs/libsvg-cairo (twp) dead upstream Cheers, Tiziano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images

2007-09-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi there, At the OpenExpo here in Zurich I got many requests for a vmware image of Gentoo. What do you think of providing a "live image" in addition to the minimal- and live-cd's? Cheers, Tiziano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild

2007-10-11 Thread Tiziano Müller
;epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > >>epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > >>epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > >>epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > > > This would be an

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/evms: ChangeLog evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild

2007-10-12 Thread Tiziano Müller
;>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" >>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" >>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" >>>> >>>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch&

[gentoo-dev] Re: Kerberos Maintainence

2007-12-10 Thread Tiziano Müller
Doug Klima wrote: > Hello all, > > Currently our Heimdal packages and MIT-KRB5 packages are woefully out of > date. I know Seemant tried for a while and I have been trying to recruit > maintainers for these packages but completely unsuccessfully. So I turn > to the mailing list to hopefully recru

[gentoo-dev] Re: X drivers up for grabs

2007-12-10 Thread Tiziano Müller
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > vmmouse input driver (For X inside VMWare) > vmware (For X inside VMWare) I can take those two if nobody else wants them. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gn

<    1   2   3   >