On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:04:13PM -0800, Corey Shields wrote:
> On Saturday 19 November 2005 08:50 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
> > Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make
> > sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements.
> > I believe the mai
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:06:18PM -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Fourth Thursday in November... so tomorrow...
Except in Canada, where it falls on the second Monday in October.
So Chris might to well to have a time-machine and make the change last
month.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:51:42PM +0100, Francesco R. wrote:
> # for i in libmysqlclient.so libmysqlclient_r.so ; do \
> for j in "" .15 .15.0 .15.0.0 ; do \
> echo ln -s /usr/lib/${i}.15.0.0 ${i}${j} \
> ; done \
> ; done
ldconfig should have created these symlinks, unless something was wrong
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:39:10PM -0500, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
>
> I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:10:46PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Any automation of that process would be really appreciated :-)
I've got a script that generates it from the rollcall data, as part of
the keyring signing stuff.
I'll attach it tommorrow (limited Net access at the moment, between ISPs
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:45:22PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Now I'm wondering - is there a sane way of handling this that doesn't
> forcefully remove python 2.4?
> e.g. could python modules be installed to multiple python versions? How
> do others (ruby, perl, ...) handle it? For the moment I'
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:59:04PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > It installs itself for all versions of Python that are on the
> > system.
> I don't fully understand the magic how it finds all Python versions,
> but can this be applied to other packages?
It can and it is. Can't recall offhand whi
I've been cleaning up media-fonts/ to work with modular-X, and I see a
lot of ebuilds with stuff like this:
for font in *.bdf; do
/usr/X11R6/bin/bdftopcf ${font} > `basename $font .bdf`.pcf
done
gzip *.pcf
For having 100 files in *bdf, this is so
For those that use the earch tool, I've written a new version that has
support for SLOTs as well as masked packages (profiles, p.mask, missing
keywords - any masking supported by portage).
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.3
Try it on sys-devel/gcc for example, where there are presently 7 sl
Newer version now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.6
Changes:
- optionally include the category in the output
- new mode to list ebuilds suitable for removal from portage (however
this only checks your current profile so far, so be careful still,
this is work in progress).
- NOCOLOR sup
New version again.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.7
Changes
- Ignores /etc/portage like repoman by default, but added -f flag to revert to
old behavior.
- Added -i flag to ignore redundant versions (those that would be listed by -r).
I've had a couple of people complain and say that earch
Another new version again, with bugfixes and cosmetic output changes.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.8
Changes:
- keywords are sorted by the order they appear on disk, with the
exception that '-*' will precede it if present.
- All '-arch' flags will always appear in the list if present o
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:10:02AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> that depends, does your code actually have things like
> #ifdef DEBUG
>
> #endif
And likewise your code should NOT have some logic like the following in
it's build system.
if(debug mode)
ignore user cflags and use our
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> A) You have commit access to gentoo-x86, AND
> B) you're comfortable with the porting process OR are adept with ebuilds
> and would like to help
I'm up for being a volunteer here.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
tcsh installed.
--
Robin Hugh Johnso
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:19:18AM +, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> A good solution should be to add the "multislot" USE flag to the ebuild
> and let it to decide whenever make it slotted or not, sorry, this is not
> viable, yes it's already used by other important packages but not well
> supported
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:19:40PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Side note: if the packages in question are fetch restricted, you're
> screwed, and will not be able to add them to the tree.
Actually, there is a solution for this, and it's reasonable logical.
Don't use the same name that upstream
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 04:34:00PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:05:00 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Is there any valid reason that we can't have portage do this
> | automatically. This particular way is very user-un-friendly.
> There's exactly one
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:37:24PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 20:18, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > I really can't think of much besides kernel + toolchain that can have
> > such devastating effects to the rest of the tree. The only other
> > massive breakages would be via
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:07:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - lots of interest in kickstart-like features in our installer ... people
> want
> to throw install media into a fresh box, boot it, and come back later and
> have it be done/usuable
The 'CLI' frontend I wrote ~9 months ago worked
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:30:23PM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> We have ~15k .tar.gz in distfiles. ~6500 .tar.bz2, ~2000 others.
> A short run over 477 distfiles spanning 833M gave me 586M of .tar.bz2 -
> roughly 30% more efficient!
> A comparison run with 7zip gave me 590M files, so bzip2 seems t
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:51:39PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP
> help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is
> rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing
> request. Since then I b
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Comments?
I have no objections to the concept - I would however like very through
testing before it's actually committed.
Could you please submit the profile as a patch to the mailing list,
thus allowing detractors to test cases t
This email is a discussion on why we need to care about more than the simple
key parameters, and why - this includes things like changing the validity of an
existing key. We also need to consider: location of key (primary key vs.
subkey), expiry policies (expiries are only one element of key validi
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:08:08AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:45:30PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> > Also, git-sources *should* use this eclass once it is in the tree since
> > people using it will save _lots_ of bandwidth and disk space.
> Yes, I'll convert it over on
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:32:13PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:08:08AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:45:30PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> >>> Also, git-sources *should* use this
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:22:25PM -0400, Mark Loeser wrote:
> This package is currently without a maintainer and has open QA issues;
> bug #123708. It was marked as testing on every arch without being
> tested and could really use someone to clean it up. It will be booted
> in 30 days if no one
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
> I don't know much about cryptography, but could you please elaborate on
> why is using one subkey for all the stuff considered a Bad Thing?
The basic form of it, is a vulnerability towards a class of attacks that
require a large supply
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 06:54:44AM -0400, Peter wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:45:17 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> >The problem, in short, is how to handle the checksumming and signing of
> >gentoo-provided files so that manipulation by external entities becomes
> >difficult.
> all snip...
>
>
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:02:22PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> ferringb took the time to write a parser and setup a cronjob
> (every 4 hours at the half hour) to parse over our GLSA's and see what
> pkgs remain in the tree and have nothing but newer versions stable. I
[snip]
Just because old versio
While digging in the tree, I found this pair.
1. sys-apps/ldetect-lst has been broken for the last 9 months since
perl-MDK-Common was removed from the tree.
2. Both of them are live CVS ebuilds, there are no fixed versions
available (upstream does have outdated SRPMs).
3. The ONLY bug ever f
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> Package: net-nds/openldap Herd: ldap Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will be keeping the most recent version of each of the major
releases, as there are still people using them for interoperability with
other systems.
> Package: sys-auth
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer.
> Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly
> 2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to
> discuss policy on t
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:06:33PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
> JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is
> independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff.
> http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1
> This is especially interesting for embedded systems wit
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:36:07PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:06:33PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:48:51AM +0100, J?rgen Schinker wrote:
> actually my x86 maschine makes at boot when it starts udev
> an ldap request and waits 6 ... 8 ...16 sec
> so at this time ldap is not running
>
> so what wants udev at this early stage ?
>
> my nsswitch.conf
>
> hosts fi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:58:46PM +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
> Xmms will be removed soon... Lot's of users still use xmms mostly
> because it has many plugins that others don't. Xmms is still stable but
> the upstream is dead so it won't take our patchset. In the end of this
> year i would like to
In the present devmanual, for src_install, it notes that
make install DESTDIR="${D}"
is the preferred way to fire off the install, and to not use emake, for
fear of parallel issues.
This has four nasty side effects:
- Global assumption that make is GNU Make (Hi flameeyes).
- Doesn't pass
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:58:07AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> For a start, practically all Makefiles generated by a recent version
> (newer than 2001 for definite) are parallel safe. There are a few minor
> cases I saw where this wasn't true, but those packages also had ot
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:41:56PM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Molle Bestefich wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Portage takes up a lot of space and time when doing server backups.
> >
> > How much of Portage needs to be backup up?
> > Any large parts of the
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:15:05AM +0200, Joerg Plate wrote:
> > Do make sure you back up the base /var/cache/edb/
> Why? Anything in /var/cache doesn't need to be in a backup,
> because it can be generated when necessary (in theory...)
The counter file is important if you intend to keep /var/log/p
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:00:43AM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> My current idea is to draw up a formal specification of what ebuilds
> are allowed to do, and what to assume about the environment in which
> they run, as well as defining the formats of everything under
> profiles/, metadata.xml fi
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:03:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > However, in consultation with some
> > folks, it seems that what may be more desirable is to just add
> > users/groups to the local files/compat backends instead, and not make
> > any changes to the remote databases.
> you mean up
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:02:27PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Thomas Cort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the proper quoting style for using epatch? In the tree there
> > are about 3 different styles...
>
> > What is the proper quoting style for defining the S variable? In the
> > tree ther
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:00:41PM -0700, infowolfe wrote:
> >Kernel headers being the virtual/linux-headers dependency that Georgi
> >mentioned. `uname -r` works, but is annoying because you can't build
> >for a kernel other than the one you're running.
> Which only applies to kernel modules, not
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:49:41PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > Could upstream have handled it better? Yes, most definitely. Did they?
> > No, not yet. We're stuck picking up the pieces.
> What does upstream have to do with the decision to "chmod u+s,go-r
> /usr/bin/gpg" or not?
If using a ker
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> media-libs/x264-svn -> dev-lang/yasm
> dev-libs/lzo -> dev-lang/nasm
I responded to you on IRC about these two, please see my message there,
as from everything I can see, the DEPs are actually correct.
(The config.log for lzo-1 indi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:53:34PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> first of all.
> What I need is _basic_ respect on #gentoo-dev
> You here seem all polite, but there you like playing me.
> This is not a good start.
Excuse me? I have never spoken to you on the #gentoo-dev IRC channel,
a
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:43:35PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> What I just need is respect.
> I might found around 150-200 bugs on (R)DEPEND. Take 200 on about 6500
> packages we have in our repository, if I take 5 minutes each, I'd end
> up to take 16 hours.
As the others said, you can either
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-misc/ASFiles2008-03-10 12:17:16 voyageur
app-portage/gatt-svn2008-03-11 18:39:22 opfer
x11-plugins/gkrel
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:37:15PM +0100, Torsten Rehn wrote:
> <+jakub> scel: basically... instead of KEYWORDREQ/STABLEREQ
> <+jakub> create keywording and stabilization components
> <+jakub> and use flags accordingly there
> <+jakub> bugzilla already has the features, why not use them
> <+jakub>
Hi folks,
Just a quick note about Escaping+Quoting stuff relevant to the usage of
linux-mod.eclass.
Up until recently, linux-mod.eclass had a bug where if you passed
variables inside the $BUILD_PARAMS variable, AND those inner variables
contained spaces, they would not be passed to Make correctly
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-23 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
games-kids/tuxtype2 2008-03-17 03:04:02 mr_bones_
games-fps/quake3-wop2008-03-17 23:23:28 nyhm
Additions:
dev-p
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:41:49PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Joining us from the land of the pyramids, we have Ahmed "b33fc0d3" Ammar.
> Although originally from Egypt, nowadays he lives in UK and studies
> Computer Engineering there. He will be joining us to help with Gnome and
> all sorts
Hi folks,
The new -r5 of Grub provides a LOT of functionality and workings over
the previous -r3 and -r4, however I would like more testers than I
previously had.
Specific functionality for testing:
- GPT partition tables (bug 178586, 211584)
- Large kernels (bug 160801)
- * Long command lines (b
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-java/cryptix2008-03-24 22:00:11 caster
dev-java/cryptix-asn1-bin 2008-03-24 22:00:12 caster
dev-java/cryptix-jce-bin20
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:33:54PM +, Duncan wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
> Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:37:13 -0700:
> > The new -r5 of Grub provides a LOT of functionality and workings over
> >
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:37:13PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The new -r5 of Grub provides a LOT of functionality and workings over
> the previous -r3 and -r4, however I would like more testers than I
> previously had.
The new grub is now out of package.mask, thanks to those th
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-04-06 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-mist 2008-03-31 06:09:41 remi
dev-libs/tinyq 2008-03-31 09:44:49 armin76
net-ftp/gtkfxp 200
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 03:10:03AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Guess I wasn't clear enough. There is no filtering in that list based on
> the developer role in Gentoo. It's all Gentoo developers marked as active
> in LDAP. We first need to add the LDAP attributes before we can add the
> filter
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 06:30:17PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> That's worrying, I'm not supposed to have commit access to the tree.
> trustees docs, yes but that's the limit. To my knowledge, I've never
> made a commit there either.
That's for ALL of CVS. Not just gentoo-x86.
--
Robin Hugh Johns
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:50:52PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Ways to track commit stats of various sorts came up, such as cia.vc
> and ohloh. cia seems to have too much downtime to rely on. ciaranm
> talked with ohloh people already. ohloh would require some
> modif
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:28:43AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:21:20 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having OhLoh would be nice, but over the course of the last year,
> > they've found that their syste
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:41:09AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:37:31 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's why I setup them up with the ability to rsync it, and they
> > never got back to me on that, nor
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:35:36PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
I'm strongly in favour of moving forw
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-04-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-video/x264-svn-encoder2008-04-07 22:46:11 yngwin
media-libs/x264-svn 2008-04-07 22:47:24 yngwin
dev-lang/smalltalk
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-04-20 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-fs/cryptsetup-luks 2008-04-14 18:58:17 cardoe
dev-scheme/mit-scheme 2008-04-14 21:19:26 hkbst
dev-lisp/gcl-cvs200
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:52:01PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
> sys-apps/ipmitool
> sys-apps/ipmiutil
> sys-libs/freeipmi
> sys-libs/openipmi
> sys-apps/edac-utils
>
> and most of them are maintained by robbat2. So Robin, please,
> comment! :)
Please don't CC me since I am actually on the list.
I
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> OK, it seems that hard lines in multipart configs seem to be an issue, so I'm
> doing this now.
>
> For a summary of why we're using hard lines you can read this thread
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/45756/focus=45
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:04:38PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008 21:46:18 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > OK, it seems that hard lines in multipart configs seem to be an issue, so
> &
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:05:35PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide
> policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be
> the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult
> metadata.xml for the pac
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-04-27 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-firewall/conntrack 2008-04-21 05:33:28 jer
sci-electronics/lard2008-04-21 17:13:26 calchan
sci-libs/libgdgeda 2008
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:34:51AM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide
> > policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be
> > the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please cons
Hi folks,
Hopefully sometime THIS weekend, I'll be moving Bugzilla as well at our
VCS services (CVS/SVN/Git on stork.gentoo.org) to new machines.
I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downtimes
are going to be minimal, as the flips will be near-live.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:02:47AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hopefully sometime THIS weekend, I'll be moving Bugzilla as well at our
> VCS services (CVS/SVN/Git on stork.gentoo.org) to new machines.
>
> I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downt
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:09:34PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downtimes
> > are going to be minimal, as the flips will be near-live.
> I'm moving bugzilla in <30 minutes.
> Starting at 20h30 UTC.
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-admin/dirvish 2008-04-28 20:11:59 ramereth
sys-libs/hardened-glibc 2008-04-29 01:05:44 pappy
sys-devel/hardened-gcc 2
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-11 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
java-virtuals/sun-jdk 2008-05-05 00:35:28 betelgeuse
x11-misc/grpn 2008-05-10 00:12:32 drac
xfce-extra/squeeze
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-18 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
profiles/selinux/alpha 2008-05-13 01:54:13 pebenito
profiles/selinux/sparc 2008-05-13 01:54:20 pebenito
media-video/fr
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:18:16AM +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tiziano ??? wrote:
> | Marius Mauch wrote:
> |>> - only have one location where members of a given team are listed,
> |>> currently it's possible and quite likely that herd
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-25 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-fonts/ttf-sil-charis 2008-05-19 00:55:31 dirtyepic
media-fonts/ttf-sil-arabicfonts 2008-05-19 02:28:05 dirtyepic
media-fonts/ttf-sil-ezra
This is more of a reminder email than anything else, in my capacity as
the VCS administrator for Gentoo.
Recently, some folk have wondered if we can come up with a better name
than 'overlays', as a lot of the newer repositories aren't actually
overlays of the tree, but rather independent developme
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-01 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-sound/gtkguitune 2008-05-27 12:52:48 drac
media-sound/playspc_gtk 2008-05-27 12:52:49 drac
media-sound/yconsole
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-08 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-util/larch 2008-06-03 02:23:20 mr_bones_
app-text/docbook-to-man 2008-06-04 16:15:57 loki_val
games-fps/ame
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:19:21PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I love aliasing :)
> Any pybugz lovers, this patch will allow use of aliases.
For anybody that wants nicer bugzilla URLS, you can use these:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/${NUMERIC}
http://bugs.gentoo.org/alias/${NUMERIC}
http://bugs.ge
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:20:47PM +0900, Takashi Yoshii wrote:
> I want sh to be supported more, and to be released officially in future.
> Currently, it doesn't have stable profile, and no 2008.0 release
> (not even as an experimental), though.
Seeing your employer's domain, can you offer pointer
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-15 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-plugins/gai-pager 2008-06-09 16:36:41 drac
x11-plugins/gai-pal 2008-06-09 16:36:42 drac
x11-libs/gai2008-0
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:50:01AM +0200, ??ukasz Damentko wrote:
> Robin H. Johnsonrobbat2
Nope, I won't be running this time around.
I've got a lot more done in the past year that I wasn't a council member
than the preceding year when I was.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or
> > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like
> > local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not
> > comments :)) use /
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 04:00:18PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> In a couple of minutes, bugs.gentoo.org should flip over to using
> CACert-issued SSL certificates. The actual key is the same as before,
> just a certificate and new CA chain in place.
For anybody with issues with thei
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-22 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-pda/syncekonnector 2008-06-19 01:22:03 darkside
dev-util/lincvs 2008-06-19 12:47:53 mpagano
x11-wm/aquamarine
Have some good Gentoo laughs?
This is a reminder that I collect input for the Gentoo-dev fortunes
database. If you have some to submit, please email them to me,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], with some combination of 'fortune' and 'gentoo-dev'
in the subject line. Should be formatted per the existing entries,
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-29 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
xfce-extra/notification-daemon-xfce 2008-06-23 02:16:35 drac
xfce-extra/xfkc 2008-06-23 03:44:30 drac
xfce-extra/xfce4-dev-t
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:04:31PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The same goes
So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
The first two editions are available here.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
Comments are welcome, as are offers to implement it.
Implementations should be a small pyt
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
> Log:
> add new major version 4.0.1
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:08:38AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> I'm getting "Connection refused" when trying to connect to
> http://bugs.gentoo.org. Is this intentional?
Yeah, read the -dev topic.
I broke it, and I'm working on it.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Ma
Ok, my bad. I screwed up. I changed something in cfengine, then rushed
off to a family dinner, and caused a couple of hours of bugzilla
badness because I didn't fully review my change.
Approximately:
2008/07/03 02h38 till 05h06.
The following bugs may have duplicate comments, or the various other
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
> Just an idea:
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
> welcome?
> It's more of an individual developer preference, but that seems the right
> place for it.
If used, what about including a
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
then upg
1 - 100 of 1903 matches
Mail list logo
