On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:34:51AM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide > > policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be > > the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult > > metadata.xml for the package or reassign to bug-wranglers with an > > explanation (and perhaps a promise to quickly change metadata.xml. :) > We're using XML 1.0 and as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong) > does the specification not guarantee element order. And because of this I > don't understand why we're not introducing a new attribute (let's call > it "primary_maintainer") which can be set to "true" for the primary > herd/maintainer (and which is being interpreted as "false" if not present). > Then it's clear which address has to be put in Bugzilla's "Assigned To:" > field... Here was the original discussion and proposal on how to handle this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
Why didn't it happen? No time to implement it basically. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgpxGl53rPQLG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
