On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:34:55PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 09:23 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > Continuing a subject I've brought up several times in the past...
> >
> > Are we any closer to having a profiles.desc that lists all valid profiles?
> > IIRC the current s
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:05:37AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> Could we by chance, mandate some sort of comment field in that file not
> unlike package.mask?
what really needs explanation ? i mean, why do you need a comment for say:
aalib media-libs/aalib
canna app-i18
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:08:45AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:05:37AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> >>Could we by chance, mandate some sort of comment field in that file not
> >>unlike package.mask
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:14AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> A. use.defaults exists for a reason, and developers are using it to
> enable functionality.
> B. Turning off a flag in use.defaults may cause undesired behavior.
>
> that reason is. If it doesn't do anything useful, then yeah, I'd lik
On Sunday 30 October 2005 03:22 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 21:09, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > Steady on Diego - what replaces divx4linux then?
>
> ffmpeg and xvid are enough to decode and encode divx files.
that avoids the implied question
can ffmpeg/xvid be used
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into
> > make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: fourteen)
> > different make.conf file
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 04:01:07PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:01 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > > > Wa
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:48:56PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 19:34, Julien Allanos (dju`) wrote:
> > So, what are the substitutes?
>
> win32codecs and realplayer-10.0.0.6 ?
you asking or telling ? didnt you learn anything in elementary school ?
-mike
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:38:13AM +, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> However, I've seen a few packages that fetch stuff during the test
> phase from the internet
if you have any packages other than libxml2 that do this, you should
file bug reports about each one
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:28:00PM +0100, Francesco R. wrote:
> Alle 20:16, mercoled? 16 novembre 2005, Mike Frysinger el ga butta:
> > |On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:48:56PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten??
> wrote:
> > |> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 19:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:20:10PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:03:04 +0000 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:28:00PM +0100, Francesco R. wrote:
> | > Alle 20:16, mercoled? 16 novembre 2005, Mike Frysinger el g
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:33:08PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> would someone more competent explain to me, why
you approached this all wrong ... you were supposed to say something
like "can we get rid of this hidden feature please"
i see no reason to keep use.defaults around anymore, i think the re
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:18:58AM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
> > specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
> > dep, that in turn enables that use flag globally, it's
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:06:02PM +0100, Max wrote:
> On 11/18/05, Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thoughts, better ideas appreciated.
>
> Well, they are called testers, so why not @testers.g.o?
because the idea was to put all future 'staff' there, not just AT's
-mike
--
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:09:29PM -0400, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
> What is the problem of giving them @g.o addresses?
read the first meeting where GLEP 41 was covered ...
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:54:44AM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:33:17AM + or thereabouts, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:09:29PM -0400, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
> > > What is the problem of giving them @g.o addresses?
> >
&g
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:23:41PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> B) What should be done with the @(subdomain_to_be_determined) email after an
>AT becomes a full dev (and presumably gets a @gentoo.org address)? For how
>long?
this is in the GLEP ... it clearly states that it will become a fo
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:26:20PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> * Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
works for me but i think makes the GLEP less meaningful
> * Change @subdomain.gentoo.org to @gentoo.org.
i'd be against this and i'm pretty sure others would be to
- the 'about' blurb has way too much vertical spacing == wasted
- the ad bar on the left should be thrown behind a purple bar like the
current site does ... it helps the user visually tune the space out as
crap they can safely ignore (at least it helps me)
- can we cut out the ads alogether for
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:49:42PM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to
> > offer i could do without completely (
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 06:14:15PM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> One of the things that I always liked about the original design was
> the fact that the front page held a considerable amount of
> information without needing much vertical scrolling.
on that note, here is another opinion of mine th
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
>
> - Where is the "Search for __ in section __" field ? I would expect it
> somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a good and tiny one.
ah, excellent idea ... we get people who ask for this from time to time
in bugzil
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:08 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 22/11/2005-12:05:38(+0900): Георги Георгиев types
>
> >
> >
>
> That ought to be
>
> of course.
or you could make it the dropdown list so people can pick
bugs.gentoo.org/gentoo.org/forums.gentoo.org/whatever
-mike
--
gent
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:09:44AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Luis F. Araujo wrote:
>
> > I agree. Why we don't use that original design? , i think removing all that
> > vertical scrolling for the front page is a good thing, and the search
> > box looks
> > handy too.
>
> They would need to
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:38:34AM -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> >I don't care what you do with the docs, but the stages 1, 3 need to
> >stay. stage2 has always been a bonus stage more or less added into the
> >mix cuz it's a byproduct of stage building (pre catalyst days).
>
> I don't think
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:22:42PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Personally I'd just kill auto-use support in the next "big" portage
> upgrade (and USE_ORDER with it as disabling auto-use is the only
> real application of it that I'm aware of).
works for me
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 06:51:44PM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:53:22AM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> > A good start could be to do that the quick and ugly way, thanks to
> > Google (with some "site:www.gentoo.org/some/thing/" and other black
> > magic in
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
> current layout for approval.
there's still a ton of wasted space in the purple bar ... if that was
tightened up, more news could be displayed ... having the last
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:29:36PM -0800, Tuan Van wrote:
> Luis F. Araujo wrote:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised
> >about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there.
> >
>
> please adjust your script.
> >=cat/foo-1.2 is valid
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
> current layout for approval.
the links in the footbars still dont have 'on mouse over' behavior
like all the other links
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:52PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> OK. I've been looking at some of these issues we've been having, and
> I've been thinking of moving enewuser, egetent, and enewgroup to their
> own eclass. This will resolve some issues with things in system, or
> otherwise early
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion
> > > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the
> > > development though.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 03:44 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:52PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > OK. I've been looking at some of these issues we've been having, and
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:49:23 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten??"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >| Hi everybody, a little question that I'd like to be answered (so that
> >| we can make it a sort of rule).
> >
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:24:44AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 19:34 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 03:44 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:50:30PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF
> executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we
> want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined.
would make more sense to have it be a FEATURE
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:12:32AM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Monday 28 November 2005 00:05, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > 3) FEATURES="noman" is dropped in favour of USE="man" or USE="manpages"
> > >
> > > In light of the above requirements a
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
>
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of v
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:22:33AM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Only thing I see
> as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade
> your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a
> system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:24:52PM -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:12 +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> > Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc,
> > and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 .
> > I know this has been d
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> what's the official status of /usr/libexec directory?
there is none afaik ... it's something we've been leaving alone for
the time being because it hasnt been that critical of an issue
personally, i'd prefer if we moved
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:50:34AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 09:51 +0100, Gregorio Guidi wrote:
> > Every user _must_ be instructed to run
> > 'revdep-rebuild --soname libstdc++.so.5',
> > if a system contains things linking to libstdc++.so.5 and things linking to
> >
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:18:05AM -0500, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-29-11 at 14:53 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > > what's the official status of /usr/libexec directory?
>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gconfbe1.uno.so (requires
> libORBit-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4)
binary packages should never be in /usr/
> Is /opt ignored?
yes, because our policy specifically says binary packages in /opt
-m
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:41:20PM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:27:10 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i know they are executables, that's why we're talking about a
> > specific subdir of lib
>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:48:10AM -0500, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-29-11 at 15:27 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:18:05AM -0500, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-29-11 at 14:53 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On T
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:16:40AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Again, would anyone know what will happen to ~x86 gcc?, Will it become
> gcc40 or just use the stable x86 gcc for everyone?
4.0.2-r1 wont be going into ~arch, but 4.0.2-r2 most likely will
i think we've done a good deal of polis
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:45:00PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 02/12/2005-02:47:55(+): Stephen Bennett types
> > On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:35:23 +0100
> > Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in
> > > th
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> That being said, my boxes have an empty /dev...
you so sure about that ? if your /dev is completely empty, you wont
get any init output because the kernel cant find /dev/console ... and
the init scripts will get pissed when they try to pi
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 04:15:30PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Matthias Langer wrote:
> > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in the
> > /dev directory.
> > And this is not only true for the box where i discovered this, which was
> > brought up from a
> > 2004.x cd
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:00:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:17:38PM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > That being said, my boxes have an empty /dev...
> >
> > you so sure
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote:
> On 12/2/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sure, in Gentoo it's been fixed (i know cause i fixed it), but every
> > other distro i know of the boot system would bomb
>
>
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:24:37PM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse
> > wrote:
> > > Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119
> > > is implementating?
> >
> > The
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:34:32PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ and http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ URLs?
> *cough*
> http
this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting.
future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we cant
remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders to go
out on the first :)
current agenda:
none ?!
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:56:42AM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> However, there already exists fix_libtool_files.sh, which does the same
> after GCC upgrade. Could this be enhanced to also handle the KDE upgrade
> case?
i would say no ... re-emerge offending packages
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:10:28AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 14:19 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> > Another series of packages that lies around, this time for media-video
> > team.
> > DirectFB requires some new maintainers to take care of it and its
> >
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> If a new maintainer is found, fine, it can remain, but currently the
> resources
> of Video team are limited and we have enough problems to take care of without
> dvdrip.
so the video herd policy is to remove packages
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting.
> > future reminders will not be late anymore ... we
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> >a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
>
> I'd rather say that we select packages that evolv
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting.
> > future reminders will not be late anymore ... we
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:21:20PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:07:19 -0500 Dan Meltzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On 12/10/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger <
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 08:05:40PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:40:59 +0000 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | there's no point in bringing it back to the council in the current
> | form as we're just likely to approve it again
>
On Saturday 10 December 2005 18:13, Lance Albertson wrote:
> I think we'll be able to work out the anonymous CVS access soon, however
> it will not be implemented as stated in the GLEP.
exact spec in the GLEP was more of an idea ... anon cvs is available -> OK
> On the other point, infra has seri
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:25:52AM -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> >>Of course, all of these points would have made it into the GLEP *if* it
> >>had been posted with plenty of time for people to comment on it instead
> >>of one day.
> >
> >
> >harping on this old point solves nothing. we've alre
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an ammendatory GLEP
or we avoid all the redtape bs and just do it, let anarchy rule
the docs team already require dates to be in -MM-DD format and it
makes sense to me
-mik
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:59:03PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation of
> what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should hold back marking a
> package stable. The only information I've been able to find states that they
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:30:59PM +, Saleem A. wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Mark Loeser wrote:
>
> > Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation of
> > what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should hold back marking a
> > package stable. The only info
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation of
> > what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should hold back marking a
> > package stable. The only information I've been ab
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:02:27PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > working on it as i said ... i wish this e-mail could have been posted
> > once i had more easier things to read :p
>
> You are working on a policy, or just
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:07:53AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:22:36 +0000 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | another good reason is that since the segment cannot be mapped
> | readonly, the memory cannot be shared across multiple processes ...
> |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:37:57AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:20:29 +0000 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | the policy i consider a no-brainer, fix TEXTRELs
>
> So... Say libfoo is
>
blah blah blah i didnt read this e-mail, i
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:59:02PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:25:57 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > no idea what you mean by "override", but here's a crazy idea ... ask
> > upstream to fix the issues.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> LDFLAGS? Assuming you meant ASFLAGS, this doesn't affect C files,
correct
> would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
> patches which add .note.GNU-stack would, right?
no
you were supposed to send tha
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
> some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
> related bugs?
this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
cc-ed th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:27:54PM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:43:28PM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> > > would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
&
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:27:19AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> > > Only problem I see with this is binary packages. We can not control
> >
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:37:54AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
> er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
didnt know e-mail clients were integrated with bugzilla
oh, they're not, so it's still hard to
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:28:04PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> 14.12.2005, 18:12:05, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
> > And for the network challenged, output in local time:
>
> And for the bandwidth/time-challenged, who do not wish to waste their time
> reading useless emails:
>
> :0:
> * ^From:[EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:27:39AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:30, Simon Stelling wrote:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/flame.html
>
> Moved it:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html
speaking of which, am i retarded, or does mod rewrite not
this months meeting wasnt too eventful, kind of quiet ... on the agenda:
- Marius: decision on multi-hash for Manifest1
there was a bit of hearsay about why the council was asked to review/decide on
this issue since we werent able to locate any portage devs at the time of the
meeting ... so our
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:20:33PM -0500, David Thomas wrote:
> Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11
> last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am.
> Please send comments.
yeah, no good ... you need to add logic for a CC_FOR_BUILD which would
then
On Thursday 15 December 2005 15:20, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> one of the following two clauses:
> > Each person at a council meeting may represent only one voting role.
>
> Or:
> > A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
> > may not be a proxy for more than one person a
On Saturday 17 December 2005 18:20, David Thomas wrote:
> Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11
> last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am.
> Please send comments.
you should startup a bug for this if one hasnt been already
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@g
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:37:16PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:47:21 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there was a bit of hearsay about why the council was asked to
> > review/decide on this issue since we werent able to locate
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:04:19PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
> | to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find
> |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> (version 1)
>
> I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
> other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> >
> >>/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> >>(version 1)
> >&
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:04:55PM -0700, Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:19 +0200, Petteri R?ty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test/java $ qgrep -v IUSE | grep xml2 | grep -e
> > "xml[^2]"
> > dev-tcltk/tclxml/tclxml-3.0.ebuild: IUSE="expat threads xml2"
> > media-libs/libwmf/libwm
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:51:08AM +, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> 3- The pinout of the psu so i can hack another solution
here's what mine says:
AC ADAPTER
ZVC36FS12
50-60Hz
12V
3.0A
EOS Corp
you might be able to google up something
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
(1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a
bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
for the 1.11.x branch .
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > since we h
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> What I don't remember is if we
> set some kind of policy then, but best to put this issue on the table
> well before New Year so that everyone will be aware of what to do when
> the time comes.
we did
the policy is that you only upd
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:43PM +0300, Vadim Konovalov wrote:
> I've noticed wrong homepage specified for tclpython (shoud be
> http://jfontain.free.fr/tclpython.htm )
use http://bugs.gentoo.org/
> Also, I want Perl module for Tcl/Tk interconnection to be available
> within as ebuild.
use htt
came someone please remind me why we havent split the tcltk USE flag
into tcl and tk ? wanting tcl support on a server makes sense, and
doing something like 'tcltk? ( X? ( tk ) )' is just dumb
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:24:10PM +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Um, I cannot remind why we did not split, because I remember (unless I am
> hallucinating of course. That was like 2 years ago, or more..) that we
> actually had them split and then they were joined.. For whatever it is
> worth
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 02:55, Duncan wrote:
> What about doing with xml what was done with gtk, when gtk2 was
> deprecated? IOW, where both are possible, default to one or the other,
> which ever one is merged, or choose one (preferably making it a
> Gentoo-wide default, for consistency) if b
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:03:39PM +, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> That is why I don't quite understand why Mozilla based browsers use the
> mozsvg
> use flag when there is already a global svg use flag available and if you
> enable svg you can pretty much guarantee you will want it in mozilla
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:58:03PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:48 +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> > (version 1)
> >
> > I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
> > oth
1 - 100 of 3334 matches
Mail list logo
