On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:29:36PM -0800, Tuan Van wrote: > Luis F. Araujo wrote: > >Hello everyone, > > > >A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised > >about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there. > > > > please adjust your script. > >=cat/foo-1.2 is valid even though foo-1.2 is no longer in the tree. I > looked at the top 4 line in your list, they are all valid entries.
yes, i imagine there are a bunch of these false positives ... you can see the gcc-config mask is wrongly flagged for this reason -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
