Hello everybody,
SeJo wrote :
> I think we should all bow and welcome Denis Dupeyron.
Thank you. Any relation with this other bending 'activity' you do with
plasmaroo ? I urgently need to re-read the fine prints.
> He's a new addition to to the sci-electronics t
The repository for SDCC has recently moved from CVS to Subversion. From now on,
please use dev-embedded/sdcc-svn instead of dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs.
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month or
so if nobody complains.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/6/06, Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month
> > or so if nobody complains.
>
> A pkg move might be wise to do, no?
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
&g
On 5/5/06, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
> absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the
> teams maintaining those herds, others might face
On 6/5/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go ahead and do it now. It really shouldn't break anything, as I can't
> think of a single thing using make_desktop _entry with a space in the
> executable name.
What about games-board/gnubg-0.14.3 ?
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org maili
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month
> or so if nobody complains.
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs is now removed.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Fabio Erculiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [02:31] lxnay: we offer all of our work that you base your
> distribution off, and you don't contribute back at all, in any way.
>
> ^^ This is a really stupid sentence.
While I would agree Halcy0n's statement is slig
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
> inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
> _games_eclass_ is one of those.
[...]
> *Please* review these eclasses because with a simp
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you remove from that list vlc, pidgin and celestia which are false
> > positives, that leaves us:
>
> Why are they false positives? They include the gnome2 eclass and other
> stuff, I guess they'll be affected too.
It finally happened. Last version was 5 years ago or so. From package.mask:
# Denis Dupeyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15 Mar 2008)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Requires Tcl 8.3 which
# isn't in the tree anymore. See bugs 172356 and 173467.
sci-electronics/lard
--
gentoo-dev@lists
# Denis Dupeyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22 Mar 2008)
# Not needed anymore. Was only used by old versions of
# sci-libs/libgeda which were just punted. Will be removed
# in 30 days.
sci-libs/libgdgeda
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eautoconf is enough.
Sorry about that. Fixed.
Denis.
���^�X��� ��(��&j)b�b�
It's my pleasure to announce the return of Josh Glover (jmglov) as a
Gentoo developer. Josh will resume his work on CJK and miscellaneous
packages.
Josh works as a Software Development Engineer for Amazon, developing
the mobile phone version of the retail website. He also serves as
Listmaster for
It's my pleasure to introduce Chris Henhawke as a new developer among
us. He is a forums veteran where he goes under the name of bunder, and
has been a moderator there for about 9 months.
Chris lives in Hamilton, Ontario, and is a computer operator who does
maintenance and support. During the inte
It's my pleasure to introduce Markus Duft (mduft) as a new developer.
He will go among us under the name of mduft, and will work in the
Gentoo/Alt project porting Gentoo Prefix to Interix. Yes, people, that
means Gentoo on Win32.
Markus lives with his wife and daughter in Graz, Austria. He seems t
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This only occured since we have no full-time
> > bug-wrangler anymore. Was anyone successful to contact him, yet?
> I am told he should be back sometime soon, like today. Apparently
> someone is in contact with him
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah or maybe they dont need any unusual fonts; its probably sane to
> set VARTEXFONTS regardless. Probably it'd be worth adding a latex
> eclass that would just contain:
> VARTEXFONTS=${T}/fonts
> and inherit it fro
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think nominations are open. I nominate
> rane
> welp
> zlin
Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In
alphabetical order:
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
Denis.
--
g
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Roy Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before the flames start lets consider the Package Manager Specification
> (PMS) as an example. For this (very black and white) illustration,
> forget the council discussions to date and imagine that representatives
> of all t
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:58:40 +0200
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Usually in this category you put everybody that disagrees with you,
>> no matter the topic.
>
> And what does that tell you about the average
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a lot to be said about being stuck in the "grand design mindset". I
> know many Gentoo, Portage, Exherbo, and Paludis developers are clearly
> coming to that point in their programming careers based on the comment
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you seriously suggesting that the portage and pkgcore developers
> think that they should be able to release a package manager that claims
> to support an EAPI when it in fact doesn't?
Please stop your incessant and
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea behind posting to the list in advance is twofold -- holding
> council members accountable for:
>
> 1) Knowing the relevant information, and
>
> 2) Participating in the source discussion if they have anything ne
>From the Times Magazine :
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html
It mostly doesn't apply to us as a community (hopefully), but one
paragraph is especially interesting.
<< In 1981, [Jon Postel] formulated what's known as Postel's Law: "Be
conservative in what you do; be liber
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They always say that stuff but never bother explaining what the direction
> they wish for actually is. As a user I get the impression that there's some
> kind of evil Cabal.
Most of the Gentoo developer population is
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed more than patches.
Oh, and like Jeremy was hinting
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Besides, in my opinion, the ability to see "what's there" in at least
> minimally categorized way without having to resort to using some special
> tools or going to some website is worht something. In this vain I was
> proposing going the
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i'm feelin pretty good about the latest sandbox-1.3.x (little stiffy even).
"little stiffy" only ? That's OK, you're just getting old. Please come
see me for your free prescription and directions for use of the blue
pills.
> i'd like to ha
2009/5/4 Sérgio Almeida :
> Please drop me a line here or at freenode if you have anything to add
All I have to add is thanks a lot. I wished other SoC students would
also introduce themselves and their project on their list.
Denis.
Joe !
How are you doing ? I've been meaning to call you but I've been busy
as hell due to the move. Do you want to have a beer or lunch sometime
?
Denis.
Oops, that was supposed to be sent to him directly. Sorry about that.
Denis.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Joe !
>
> How are you doing ? I've been meaning to call you but I've been busy
> as hell due to the move. Do you want to have a
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> Because the way Gentoo works, any objection to a proposal, valid or not,
> whether or not it's already been addressed, has to be answered before a
> proposal gets anywhere. Thus, every time people post nonsense about
> GLEP 55, every post h
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> Except that at the last Council meeting, there were complaints that
> objections *had* been included and discussed in the GLEP, and claims
> that including such material made the GLEP less clear.
As unfortunate as it is, council members ha
2009/5/17 Piotr Jaroszyński :
> I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
Thanks a lot Piotr.
> Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
>
> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
> 3. Easily fetchable EAPI
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> I'd like to counter-nominate you
Aww... That must hurt.
Denis.
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński :
> I nominate:
[...]
> Calchan
Thanks Dawid, and also Ferris. I accept. You can find my manifesto at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/manifesto09/manifesto.html
Denis.
Hi Doug,
I just got to this thread, so sorry for entering the debate a bit
late. I find your propositions very interesting. In my manifesto [1] I
have proposed something significantly different which simply consists
in spinning the long discussions off the council meetings using more
focused group
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> This is not a debate nor is this thread meant to be a launching point
> for people to promote their own campaign for being on the council and
> I chide you for taking it as such.
I was just trying to contribute to the debate, no more. Since
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
> Sorry to be a pain but I just wonder if I filled this bug correctly because
> nothing happens: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244436
>
> I'm not putting any pressure in any way, I just want to know if I did it
> right.
[...]
This list is for technical discussions only. Also, public mailing-lists are
not for discussing your personal issues.
Denis.
> probably belongs in -project.
Not even in -project, it simply wasn't public mailing-list material.
For those who haven't understood yet, the -dev and -project mailing
lists are not for keeping us informed of your random thought of the
day or lamenting about
why-oh-why-is-the-whole-world-so-unfai
Thanks for the reminder, Doug.
Make sure to also check everybody's manifesto here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council-200906-nominees.xml
Denis.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> To appoint as proxy for a council meeting someone who has been booted
> from Gentoo is a clear lapse of judgement, and would in my eyes
> disqualify the involved council member from functioning in that position.
As Petteri noted it's not obvio
I'll have things to say about this but I'm still in the woods with
dialup until monday. So either I can get close to a fatter pipe later
today or tomorrow, or I'll do it on monday night from home.
Denis.
2009/7/3 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto :
> Yes, that is another thing I was planning to do. The only reason I
> haven't done it yet, is that older manifestos were stored as txt files
> and this year the candidates mostly opted for html/xml files.
> I'll probably just go ahead, "ignore the looks" and c
Hello Robson,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Robson Roberto Souza
Peixoto wrote:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250853
> On bugzilla has the patch to solve the problem
The people concerned by this already know about the bug and patch,
there is no need to remind us here. They will get t
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Ciaran
McCreesh wrote:
> Perhaps you should consider that it's your behaviour that's the issue here.
It's both your behaviors, because they're extremely similar. Except
that you seem to have more time available than slong to express your
defensive personality on our
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Certainly. But it is likely much more interesting work and has
> considerably more impact.
The mentoring period and the review have considerable impact too.
Whether you think one is more important than the other depends on you
thinking short
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Sergei Trofimovich
wrote:
> TL;DR;TL;DR:
>
[...]
Here's a data point you may, or may not, find relevant. in 16 years of
using Gentoo exclusively, the only one time I used stable on one machine
for about 2 years it ended up being much more of a pain than unstable.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> When in the last 16 years was this 2 year period of running stable?
> The general state of QA has varied quite a bit over that time.
>
I would say 3 or 4 years ago, roughly.
> running unstable systemd has been
Running unstable doesn't m
Google Summer of Code 2016 is starting.
If you are a student please be patient. Your time will come soon, at which
point we'll be able to answer all your questions. In this initial phase the
audience is project mentors. Note that you do not need to be a Gentoo
developer to be a mentor.
While we a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> developers who did what they cared about and ignored everything and
> everyone else.
>
I don't know if I'm an exception to the rule, but I've always had fruitful
interactions with the games team. I never felt they ignored me.
> games team
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:53 -0700
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > Not true. I've been maintaining games for a decade and have never been
> on
> > the team.
>
> Quoting the previous documentation of games.ec
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I was stating the apparent state of facts. If people are told they're
> supposed to go with games team, use their eclass, follow their
> policies, that's how it looks to people.
That's an entirely different point from the one I was making.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Well, maybe it's because you can talk to Python team, discuss and not
> get ignored by them.
We've already established the same is true for the games team. I'm a living
example of it and I can't imagine I'm the only one.
> Unlike games
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Maier wrote:
> And I see absolutely no harm in explicitly annotating the actual
> copyright in gentoo ebuilds.
It seems like a simple and practical enough way to go. However, one of
the arguments going for assigning copyright to the Gentoo foundation
at t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> This information, by the way, has been blogged about thousands of
> times.
There is a reason people write documentation. Contrary to blog posts,
documentation is thought out, reviewed, maintained and corrected when
necessary. Blogs are wr
I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not
propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being
actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch
it without talking to that person or team first. This is probably the
single most important ru
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> However, if somebody just commits something to your package, and it
> causes you headaches, and they aren't committing to long-term
> maintenance of the package, then yes, you can revert, etc.
That's where you're wrong. You can revert if nece
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> When someone asks about changing a package which someone else maintains, I
> always suggest reporting a bug about it. Do you think that is generally ok,
> or not the proper way to communicate?
Exactly. Bugzilla is not a commun
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> This is nothing new; the qa team has requested that commit rights be
> suspended before. I am just proposing that we actually add the parts of
> the old patch to the glep that spell out when and how this can happen.
>
> Thoughts?
Yes, thoug
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> It is more of a "Do we want QA to delegate this through ComRel or not?".
Actually, no. What it is is a "Subject was thoroughly discussed in the
past, and a decision was made." More than once, in fact. What basis do
you have that would warrant
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Hi. TL;DR, this is basically just a THANK YOU to the Gentoo devs
This is totally unacceptable. I demand you take your thank-yous back.
Who do you think you are to thank us like this, even with valid
reasons? Good manners will not be to
Please do not take this personally.
I honestly wonder what all the fuss is about. There are a few games
I've helped with over the years and I've never had any trouble at all
having my stuff reviewed and accepted. And I'm a lousy ebuild writer.
Every time I'd suggest a fix, bump, or new package, an
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Last rites cancelled; found a version bump'ed distfile via icculus, so
> this one can live a little longer.
I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial
package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at the time was t
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, hasufell wrote:
> a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead.
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
Denis.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, hasufell wrote:
> People often reply aggressively to unrequested reviews
People often replay aggressively when they feel aggressed. Food for thought?
Denis.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
> Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e. the
> copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not have
> anything to do with this.
I agree with you and Ulrich. That was a very poor choice of word from
my p
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> So, RESTRICT="mirror" would turn into
> RESTRICT="officially-dont-mirror-but-actually-do-just-in-case-distfiles-are-dropped-upstream-but-after-we-still-cant-officially-mirror-them-due-to-license-and-copyright-infringement-anyway"
> ?
>
>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> x265-1.2.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~x86"
> x265-1.3.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
> x265-.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
>
> As in... You forgot to add ~arm to -.ebuild
Wait, what? Live ebuilds are keyworded now?
De
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-libs/x265/x265-.ebuild?revision=1.9&view=markup#l9
Thanks, Alex. This makes more sense now.
Denis.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> AFAIK, gentoo policy is that live ebuilds should always be masked so as
> never to be automatically pulled in without a deliberate unmasking of the
> live ebuild, but whether that's masked due to lack of keywords (ebuild),
> or
Good news !The sci-electronics herd isn't one day old yet, but it is already diaper free (well, almost).In case you're interested to help, please drop us a message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And don't forget to bring your own soldering iron.Denis.
On 7/7/06, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the Council idea is great. However, I think
the Council should be charged with a little bit of direction-setting and
leadership as well.
[...]
1. The council was (by design?) a reactive force, rather than a
pro-active force.
[...]
Dear devs,
In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die
on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer :
"Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a global flag.
Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it works globally, while
On 7/10/06, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ebuilds shouldn't die on anything according to the non-interactive portage
philosophy. I don't know how official that philosophy is though.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this has nothing to do with being
interactive or not. To me, an ebuild that
On 7/9/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, if you're using daft CFLAGS you're on your own. Some ebuilds
might filter them, some ebuilds might die and some ebuilds might let
them through. Developers are under no obligation to add code to save
users from their own stupidity, b
On 7/11/06, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Their phrase, not mine. ;) I think the idea is you should be able to emerge -e
world and walk away and not have anything interrupt the process thus requiring
the user interact with the system.
Well yes, but an ebuild that dies, whatever the reas
On 7/30/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another class of packages I wish to discuss (not remove quite yet, just
talking ;) ) are older packages with stable markings. By Stable I mean
debian stable, IE we stabled it in 2004 and no one has touched it since.
Do these packages still work
On 7/31/06, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thirdly, I know one of the issues with one of the leaders of the
project, is the fact that they are not a ebuild developer. I'd like to
have them take the second quiz simply to prove that they have the
knowledge to be trusted to review the ebu
On 8/1/06, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# emerge --submit-info
* sys-apps/portage generates emerge --info output and uploads it
relatively tamper-proof to tickets.g.o, and
* returns a ticket to the user, a unique number that he or she can
communicate to developers and active users
On 8/2/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The alternative to elitism is mediocrity. Would you like Gentoo to be a
mediocre distribution?
The real world isn't binary. So there's a whole range of alternatives
between elitism and mediocrity.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing lis
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
I was thinking about
On 10/26/06, Peter Volkov (pva) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of packages I maintain changed its name. What shall be done, so
users of the package were aware about package name change and upgraded
flawlessly?
See :
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#doc_ch
On 10/30/06, Jason Wever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
any of the following (which are punishable by death):
1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
when resulting in broken dependencies.
I have p.masked dev-embedded/gpsim-led and dev-embedded/gpsim-logic.
Their functionality is now included in all recent versions of gpsim,
at least all versions that are currently in portage. Plus, they are
suspected of being compilation-challenged (which is hardly
surprising), see bug #96578.
Wha
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is standard practice for professional standards, and is the
Now you talk about this, a standard is, in standard practice, the
result of a collaborative effort of representing members of the
organization(s) that is (are) supposed to adh
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You know that real standards aren't a free for all, right? They're
usually written by a small group, and then commented on by interested
parties when they're already well into being written. Which is exactly
what we're doing...
You forgot t
On 2/22/07, Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So after peper and myself have been on fixing most stuff related to this
topic yesterday, here now is a list with remaining packages and their
respective maintainers.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jokey/manifest2/manifest2-20070222.txt
I have fixe
On 2/27/07, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's my please to introduce to you Daniel "drobbins" Robbins. Daniel is
Who's that ?
In his dark past Daniel has worked for companies like Microsoft
I wish we had higher recruitment standards. He probably doesn't even know bash.
Welcome
On 3/3/07, Daniel Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now, installing Gentoo is a chore, and the many wonderful
choices of Gentoo end up making the install rather complicated. So I
definitely support ideas to help make our installation process
better/streamlined and less confusing. There are
On 3/3/07, Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Next time, read the documentation first.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/list.xml
We've several quickstart/faq-type guides, and an alternate installation
howto. Man, I wish more developers would read the documentation, or at
least bother to get a g
On 3/5/07, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That said, I'm not necessarily opposed to mandating civility, a la
Ubuntu. I do see a minor problem with that approach, though: right now
it is not clear that Gentoo has a group of devs who are sufficiently
trusted and willing to actually puni
sci-electronics/modelsim needs its Manifest to be regenerated in
Manifest2 format and I don't have access to the necessary tarballs to
do so. Does anybody out here have access to a modelsim license or
installation ? I used to, quite some time ago, but not anymore. If you
do, please contact me off-
From your draft:
(note: most parts shamelessly stolen from Christel)
In that case, showing only what differs from Christel's proposal would
have been a better way to present yours.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 3/15/07, Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that sums the most important differences up, if you need more
information, please read post proposals. ;-)
It's much clearer like this, now. Thank you.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Bernard,
Welcome to the French Connection in Gentoo ! And thanks for updating NX.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 3/22/07, Shaochun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I write several ebuilds for packages which aren't available in the
portage currently. I'd like to share them with gentoo community, but I
don't know how to publish these ebuilds. And I also don't know by which
way a package will be added to the
On 3/22/07, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Antoine Raillon (also known as cab), our
latest addition joining mcummings perl flock.
Antoine is joining us from Cormeilles en Parisis, France (yay, french
conspiracy++), where he's currently studying Net
On 3/24/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3. We should ask Google for their opinion on this. They are, after all,
running the scheme, PAYING US MONEY, and are the people who decide
whether we get to participate in future years. I have asked Alec to
inquire about this.
This is by far t
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
