On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is standard practice for professional standards, and is the
Now you talk about this, a standard is, in standard practice, the result of a collaborative effort of representing members of the organization(s) that is (are) supposed to adhere to said standard. I believe I don't need then to explain you how far what happens around PMS is from standard practice. You say you want to avoid endless discussions "in the interest of getting it finished". Now, if your work is that good, why would there be any discussions about it? If it's not good enough, why wouldn't you let us talk about it and make it better? Also, if it goes in the wrong direction, one that Gentoo devs won't follow, what's the point in finishing it? Denis. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
