Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
der discussion. There are still some TODO items. These | are calls for people to weigh in with suggestions. Of course, | suggestions on other items are good too..." I want people to review and comment on it after they've actually read the thing. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Develop

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:05:45 -0500 "Nathan L. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:45:08 -0500 "Nathan L. Adams" | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | Just keep in mind that portage is supposed to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
first place. The | "lightweight" requirement appears to just be your way of subverting | the current documentation standards (because of your XML hatred). I don't have a web browser installed on my server. Do you? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cro

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
works. | (Don't lie). And you expect that the average user installs a Gentoo | server without at least referencing the documentation? Pa-leaze. I bet there're lots of people who don't read the documentation using the machine on which they're installing. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ty with existing news sources. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgprpwi22W4JW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
s closing. store value | attached to tag1." That is not parsing XML. That is parsing some arbitrary markup language you just invented. Please read the XML specification, note how complex some of the little used side features are, and then remember that a compliant XML parser has to implement

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
x27;s hard enough mapping GLEPs onto that... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgptD2mgbtnrt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
XML auto-conversion tool... If there's anything in the GLEP that makes doing so harder than should be necessary, please let me know because I'd consider that to be a problem needing attention... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: cia

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ly something else to go on about, the eselect news module is now upgraded to the 'suggested' tool for displaying news items. Look! I'm sneakily and evilly pushing a sekrit agenda here! Also, I murdered three puppies last night. Grant, please commit this to CVS. I'm too scared of

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
require specific ordering is not exactly likely... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpQ4ILvctsgy.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
posted to a specific place. | I hope I have not created a new opportunity for large flame wars. I | tried being quite constructive, and reviewed the GLEP as a scientific | paper. It's a technical paper rather than a scientific one, so I'm not bothering to justify things that every developer should already know. It's mostly a question of space... I *could* bog everyone down in twenty pages of references, but why bother? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpJiHQifOwND.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
#x27;m whinging about it). But it's such a nice word! | Points above regarding working sanely for N repos need be addressed, Which I'll do right before Portage gets N repo support. | So... reiterating jasons question, example where news items transcend | package specific? Easy

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
o get hit by upgrade problems. So so long as news items are kept around for a "sufficiently long" period of time, there aren't going to be issues. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web :

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ync by | emerge as unread. | | Might want to consider some way to mark an item as read without | waxing it from the directory, if against it, clarify in the glep why. Hrm. Append '.read' to the filename? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
s the | above to the system package set be enough to force this new | information dispersal method on users? Performance. I have a bash script which does the installs that could easily be called by a hook, but it has to call portageq quite a bit. Otherwise a hook would be fine... Possibly i

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:58:40 + (UTC) Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I can't resist. I think you mean '"not" after "system,"': | "...*before* they break the user's system, not after " Uh oh, I think I finally crack

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:13:32 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Hrm. Append '.read' to the filename? | | chmod -r filename Makes writing clients a pain in the ass. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaran

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:24:01 -0500 Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | 051105 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > News Item File Format | ... | > The news item will be named in the form | > ``-mm-dd-item-name.en.txt`` | ... | > News Item Headers | ... | > Date of post

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:24:14 -0500 Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Consistency with GLEPs. | | Sorry, that doesn't mean anything: | could you offer something which makes more sense ? GLEP 1 mandates date headers in that format. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
u won't be able to satisfy your "preemptive" | requirement. Not at all. You can warn users repeatedly, but there comes a point when trying to warn them any further becomes futile. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpW2Hb1pkuCA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
#x27;m incredibly game for. Yes | it's extra work for you, but you're proposing the change ;) | | You're going for forward compatibility... this is just that. I'm going for not making any design decisions which will preclude reasonable future changes. -- Ciaran McCreesh :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
plement. "Earth changing" (for some Gentoo users) announcements | can and should go to announce -- that's what it's there for. Why should every user have to sign up to be spammed with irrelevant GLSAs and news items for packages which they do not use? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:33:50 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > | Which means you won't be able to satisfy your "preemptive" | > | requirement. | > | > Not at all. You can warn users repeatedly, but there comes a point | >

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
deps to portage), not add in even more. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpFL558sTJ7z.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:50:22 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Saturday 05 November 2005 01:58, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > ``Posted:`` | >     Date of posting, in ``dd-mmm-`` format (e.g. 14-Aug-2001). | > UTC time in ``hh-mm-ss +`` format may also be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | So, what list should the user that wants to receive those | **important** messages sign up to? That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up for things. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
evil. The least you can do to make everybody happy, is allow | pull-based access to the important news items, and devote some more | words on how to disable your 'feature'. Why does it need more words? It already has a sentence, and that's all that's needed. -- Ciaran McCree

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
m than one which actually works. Right. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpaJj5K8cVDB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:12:20 -0500 Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm serious -- Gentoo should try to follow international standards The format specified in GLEP 1 is an international standard. It's just not the same international standard that you're after. -- Cia

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 43: GLEP File Hosting

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
n the main site whenever the web nodes next sync -- may be wise to read that instead if you aren't familiar with RST :: blocks. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm GLEP

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 43: GLEP File Hosting

2005-11-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
lso makes it slightly harder to copy the code out, especially if tab/space indenting needs to be preserved. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgpEkkxoHEwYk.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
set to | Sunday, November 13th, 20:00 UTC. Assuming there aren't any further comments between now and then, I'd like GLEP 34 (GLEP File Hosting) to be approved please. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:57:54 + Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Assuming there aren't any further comments between now and then, I'd | like GLEP 34 (GLEP File Hosting) to be approved please. No, 43. Not 34. Bleh. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
, chopping off the .??.txt, removing duplicates and counting. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
te ranges as | read. Eh, yet another file. No real need for it really, it just adds complexity. Besides, /etc isn't for program-generated data. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
nt some thing being implemented sooner than | others, but multi-channel distribution (to use a buzzword) is a | requirement from where I come from. I'd really rather that news.gentoo.org / news2announceemail / whatever were handled via separate GLEPs. 42 is fairly long as it is... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ding to emerge, and treating | GLSAs as a special case). hh! We're not supposed to be mentioning that until the thing's up and running. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
other things wrong with it | for full price, and just planning on fixing when it actually breaks. | It costs a lot more that way. Is this better or worse than refusing to buy a working car because it doesn't come with fluffy dice? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on | the web site. Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discussion? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=test and the internet

2005-11-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ithout FEATURES="test", and without feature-specific deps | (farily useless overall), there would have to be a USE="test" to take | advantage of this. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105170 And the general solution to fixing things: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/realone, media-video/realvideo-codecs and old versions of realplayer

2005-11-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
hat you studiously attended the classes where they taught 'capital letters' and 'punctuation'. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] punting the use.defaults feature

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
plicitly. | | Put USE="-* oneuse twouse reduse blueuse" in make.conf to set the | globals, and _then_ start tweaking in "package.use". ...and then watch your system explode because you didn't set various USE flags which should only be turned off on embedded systems. use.def

Re: [gentoo-dev] punting the use.defaults feature

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
one way or the other -- just stating a | fact. Sure, because a) you're careful, b) you know what you're doing and c) it used to be the case that no* USE flags were used for "stuff that really should usually be on". -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:01:34 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | This sounds good to me as well, very professional. The problem with staff is that staff who aren't ATs/HTs won't be using it... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
s no | confusion. If anyone wants to pursue this we should start a new | thread to keep the issues seperate. If someone's going to do that, could they consider @herd.g.o as well? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org W

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
staff.gentoo.org for forum admins, PR people, etc Not really. Lots of people are in multiple roles... Plus, the @dev. thing goes against what we've been doing for years. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ntial period of time". In other words, not ATs, who are ATs because they lack the experience or commitment to be fully fledged developers. Far easier to withdraw the GLEP and just ask for anon cvs access for people who need it... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
not be recognized? Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in ChangeLogs. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:27:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | 19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in | > ChangeLogs. | | How exactly does testing stuff fit into *changelogs*, have I missed | something?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
at clearly broken things would end up getting "works for me" spammed even more than they are already... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
use it, but arch people need to know who keyworded what and when. If anyone's doing keywording without a ChangeLog entry they deserve a good kicking... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ge number of average Joe types to produce a Gentoo Wiki article on the design and internal workings of versionator.eclass. | Just openly brainstorming here.. There was a similar proposal from (?)rac a couple of years back. Might be worth looking at why arch teams hated it last time around. -- Ciar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
s a result there's lots of mess. What did you expect would happen when you cut out a core part of the process? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
sion happen. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-dev. They went ahead and submitted it to the council anyway, ignoring feedback and ignoring questions as to why it was submitted with issues outstanding. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
is good/bad | because..." Pfff, anyone looking at Gentoo from the outside in will see that a) our management is a mess, and b) we can still stick out a decent end product despite of that. Since we're an open project, what's the point in lying to our users? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: implementation details for GLEP 41

2005-11-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
period then you're going to lose more than two drives anyway. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] opinion on how to improve the website redesign

2005-11-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
'high | profile' location like that, it makes people think of it as a new logo The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it! -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
volved, and how many were knee-jerk reactions from morons who thought that there was a reason to use stage1s other than for seed stages and to get around a nasty bug in stager (which we no longer use)? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
27;t fall over and die because of unlisted circular dependencies. | but it just seems that the claim that the old and new methods produce | _exactly_ the same results seems to be stretching things a bit. How do you think stage3s are built in the first place? -- Ciaran McCreesh : G

Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
en, it was claimed that the infinity was just a minor detail and not part of the design itself. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:49:47 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of | > voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinit

Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments/review: twisted.eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
7;t use tr in global scope. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
hich I can use on CD with Gentoo? Consult your lawyer. Any legal advice you get on this list will be bogus. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
d make lots of noise about communities, go and do it on the forums or somewhere else where you won't be wasting our time. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer's guides?

2005-11-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
r package maintainers couldn't stick together a coherent English sentence even if they were paid to do so... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Supreme Lord Gerbil Wrangler) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer's guides?

2005-11-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:58:46 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Thursday 24 November 2005 20:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Of course, the problem | > with that is that some our package maintainers couldn't stick | > together

Re: [gentoo-dev] manpages that requires dependencies

2005-11-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
hey're core, so they don't get a USE flag. Of course, if FEATURES were in the USE expand list, you could use ! features_noman ? ( ) ... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Supreme Lord Gerbil Wrangler) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] manpages that requires dependencies

2005-11-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:43:23 -0500 Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > man pages can't be considered optional (despite what RMS says). | > They're | > not fancy extra HTML API documentation, they're core, so they don&#

Re: [gentoo-dev] manpages that requires dependencies

2005-11-27 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
proper solution requires Portage changes. Unfortunately, for some packages waiting a year or more to fix something isn't an option. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (The one that looks before leaping) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN

2005-11-28 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
per to accept. Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless it gets some review... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (The one that looks before leaping) Mail: ciar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN

2005-11-28 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:57 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fac

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc

2005-11-29 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ories in /usr/lib*. Those old people with beards got it right. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-11-30 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
you're just repressing the memory of it... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_URI? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
now a safe, correct way of specifying modular X dependencies that will actually work? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Looking for a vile maintainer

2005-12-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
refer. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass subdirectory for x-modular.eclass

2005-12-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
#x27;t want to repeat that mistake. Use SRC_URI instead. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] The deal with epkgmove

2005-12-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:56:55 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'd suggest having a look at git or mercurial, they are tested on a | quite big workload and they seems good enough for the task. Workload isn't the issue. It's number of files. -- Ciaran McCree

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | current agenda: | none ?! How about a decision on what's to be done to fix the GLEP 41 mess? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:07:19 -0500 Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On 12/10/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | current agenda: | > | none ?! | > | >

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
its current form, and would still approve it? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
y as something that should be easily doable. * Anything involving XML. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm GLEP: 42 Title: Critical News Reporting Version: $Revision: $ Author: Ciaran M

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
o sync on a | > ``cron``) are left as options for those who desire them. | | By "suggested" you mean that it should be referenced in the news help? News help, handbook etc, yes. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
this can be done within this GLEP or rather outside? That's beyond the scope of the GLEP. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
idered. The Admin may have very well forgot about some particular | News Item, and if it is removed, this box will 'miss' the News Item. A news item is no longer relevant when there's no reasonable way in which it could apply. Six months is still relevant... Updates go back to 3Q-2002,

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
. You forgot d) a pain in the ass to parse, e) inconsistent with everything else, f) a pain in the ass to sort, g) massive overkill. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signatu

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ead on? Or any | other metadata? A new file would need to be created anyway due to | format constrainst placed on news.read... Hrm. Does the GLEP need to cover how news readers that want to keep track of whether or not the sysadmin was wearing pants last tuesday should work too? -- Ciaran McC

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
s. | Nope, which is why news.read shouldn't be specified. news.read is specified because there was demand for it the last time around. It's staying specified because the reasons given were based upon convincing use cases rather than random speculation. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo D

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
th the subdomain | idea (i would however offer lube; more for myself though). You're assuming that the GLEP authors are competent and willing to listen to feedback. When this isn't the case, it's the council's job to stand there and say "go away and don't come back unt

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
nd for it the last time | > around. It's staying specified because the reasons given were based | > upon convincing use cases rather than random speculation. | | Can you show a use case that crosses several readers? Look back to the original thread. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
;t cause breakage. Ok, give me a list of every single future enhancement to Portage and I'll make sure the GLEP will be compatible with them. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
itories, and get that specification agreed upon by the people who will end up having to use it. *Then* come back and ask me to add in more complexity. I'm not going to over-complicate things to deal with random hypothetical half-baked speculation. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can ki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
roduces new functionality, then clients and the specification can easily be updated to handle said functionality. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
l were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be approved? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
le author with a committee. We don't want to end up designing things like Ada, after all... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
rmit. Fixing that would require fixing portage to support multiple repositories rather than using overlay, which is an issue for a different GLEP. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciara

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
r jobs properly. Your GLEP is trying to solve the wrong thing... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ing before commenting please. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm GLEP: 42 Title: Critical News Reporting Version: $Revision: $ Author: Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
ne? | | Pointing at Internationalizable The standard for Gentoo documentation is to use whichever variant the original author prefers. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm signa

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >