On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:32:19 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I was referring to the item-name.  It is defined to allow "-", whild
| the fields are also separated with "-".  Hence I suggested to allow
| "_" in the item-name instead of "-" to avoid (possible) problems when
| parsing the field.

The fields are separated with .s. Underscores for the name don't make
parsing any more or less difficult.

| > | In any case, elaborate on why supporting only OR was chosen and
| > | why other (probably investigated) options were discarded (and
| > | hence make my statement above unnecessary).
| > 
| > The previous draft had an option for and or none-of modes. I took it
| > out because I don't think it's going to be anywhere near as useful
| > as one might initially think.
| 
| I'd appreciate it if that would be documented and grounded.

Actually, I'm starting to think Jason's idea works best.

| Then what is the point in requiring it is correct English?  (Not even 
| considering the big difference between UK/US English)  You can and
| will not enforce it.  Everyone writing such news item will do her/his
| best to make it sound like real English, and perhaps ask for help,
| but that's it.  Hence my suggestion to put the doc writers in the
| loop somehow.

What makes you suppose that the doc writers are the most qualified
English language speakers?

| > | Does portage only 'warn' and still continue, or does it completely
| > | stop when an unread news item is found for a package that is to be
| > | upgraded? In the first case, the 'preemptive' requirement is being
| > | violated, in the latter, the option for a '--force' or something
| > | must be discussed. (Users with multiple systems might already
| > | know the message, or users might not be interested in it since
| > | they don't run the application in production.)
| > 
| > Portage only *warns* you if you try to unmerge glibc...
| 
| Which means you won't be able to satisfy your "preemptive"
| requirement.

Not at all. You can warn users repeatedly, but there comes a point when
trying to warn them any further becomes futile.


-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachment: pgpW2Hb1pkuCA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to