On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:49 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP | > saying "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure | > said documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group | > were in favour, and the developer community in general were in | > favour, and the council were in favour, and the people proposed by | > the GLEP to manage the new documentation were in favour, but the | > existing owners of the developer documentation were not, you're | > saying that it shouldn't be approved? | | Yes.
Unworkable. Your proposal would allow a small group of obstinate developers to hold back progress. The problem here is that the council isn't acting as a decent last line of quality control when the GLEP authors fail to do their jobs properly. Your GLEP is trying to solve the wrong thing... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
