Hi,
> Since the pkgconfig files for xulrunner-1.9 are renamed to avoid
> collisions with current xulrunner-1.8.
In general I dont think that is a good idea to do that as you said
we'll have to patch all the rev deps of xulrunner. More importantly
we'll have to carry on those patches forever becau
Hi,
> There are two methods commonly used to fight against this situation
> in ebuilds: using addwrite or setting VARTEXFONTS="${T}/fonts". The
> second method is, probably, better.
Packages should definitely go for the VARTEXFONTS one as I'll probably
drop forced global writable /var/cache/fonts
On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:57:02 +0200
Patrick Kursawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:23:29PM +, Andrey Grozin wrote:
> [...]
> > Most disturbingly, there are a number of packages which (probably)
> > run latex and do neither addwrite nor VARTEXFONTS. An incomplete
> > li
On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:20:31 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008, Andrey Grozin wrote:
>
> > There are two methods commonly used to fight against this situation
> > in ebuilds: using addwrite or setting VARTEXFONTS="${T}/fonts". The
> > second method is, pr
> A. Convince the portage developers to put it in
> make.conf/make.defaults.
By the way, I'm strongly opposed to this: it should be, at best, in the
profiles.
For instance, as long as bug #192403 isn't fixed, as-needed will cause
*a lot* of build failures on fbsd since gcc specs are broken and
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:41:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tue, 3 Jun 2008 05:52:35 +
> Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > I think nominations are open. I nominate
>
> Then I'd like to nom
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:42:34 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Enable FEATURES=test by default (bug #184812)
> >
> > Only if >99% of the stable and ~arch tree and all potential "system"
> > packages build with it (IOW: no)
>
> Err.. Maybe this could have been phrased bet
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:48:01 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02:47 Mon 26 May , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > A while back, vapier added some tests for the toolchain-funcs
> > eclass to /usr/portage/eclass/tests/. I really like the idea, and I
> > recently discovered an xUni
Dear all,
app-text/tetex is currently assigned to tex as maintainer, but, in my
opinion, that's a lie. I have not seen any movement on tetex bugs for a
while.
I have opened a tracker bug (#227443, [1]), if someone feels the
courage of picking it up. I don't have neither the time nor the will to
do
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:45:35 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:57:45 +0200
> Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The other option is to p.mask and last rite it, breaking mips and
> > s390 trees, leaving them witho
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:18:19 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> libogg and popt are now masked, and they'll wait a bit before return
> to ~arch that way.
2 months later, any news on this ? I've been using the unmasked
versions so long; are we going to wait forever ? It's
Hi,
> dev-lang/erlang (lang-misc) -- a version bump now and then (four
> times a year), seldomly but then obscure bugs, cooperative upstream
I would appreciate if you could take care of my fbsd problem ;p
> mail-client/claws-mail and all plugins (net-mail) -- a version bump
> is some work, b
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:55:02 +0100
David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 20:45:33 Ben de Groot wrote:
> > It really baffles me that some developers are forcefully retired for
> > anti-social behavior, but are not consequently banned from the
> > places where they dis
That's a bit sad that I announce this as I learnt caml with it, too many
years ago.
Reasons:
Does not build (bug #206138), unmaintained upstream for years, not
very useful nowadays. Use dev-lang/ocaml instead.
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:00:23 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More than a year ago, I had my first occurrence of a package that
> refused to work when run as root: dev-db/mysql. This lead to the
> following block of code in the src_test block:
>
> if [[ $UID -eq 0 ]]; then
>
Hi,
# Masked for removal on 04 Oct 2008
# Provided by tetex-3, ptex and texlive-fontsrecommended or
# texlive-latexrecommended, which makes them uninstallable anyway.
dev-tex/extsizes
dev-tex/eurosym
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:55:00 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
> > this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
>
> Go for it!
+1
And thanks aga
Hi,
dev-tex/vntex will be removed in 30 days.
Reason:
Masked since early 2007. Included in tetex-3, ptex and
texlive-langvietnamese. If someone wanted to keep the ebuild around for
single package updates, he had plenty of time to do it. Now it is old
and unmaintained and therefore will be remove
Hi,
> When EAPI 2 goes live built_with_use should probably die for most
> cases.
I don't understand here: you mean die like being removed or die like
the die call in an ebuild? If I understood correctly the following it
should be the latter.
> Are there valid use cases for built_with_use that a
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:33:44 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen kirjoitti:
> > On Monday 22 September 2008 22:25:20 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >>> If you mean something like
> >>>
> >>> built_with_use cat/foo coolfeature || ewarn "bar will be more
> >>> useful if you
Hi Diego,
> EAPI=2
[...]
> src_compile() {
> WX_GTK_VER="2.8"
> need-wxwidgets unicode
>
> econf \
This causes me a configure failure because I don't have a system
wxwdigets profile set and need-wxwidgets doesn't seem to do anything.
1.3.5 is fine; -r1 fails at configure. I d
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:38:41 +0200
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
>
> > EAPI=2
> [...]
> > src_compile() {
> > WX_GTK_VER="2.8"
> > need-wxwidgets unicode
> >
> > econf \
>
>
> Thi
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:24:55 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2008 10:27:51 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Maybe it would be worth adding repoman warnings/errors for econf
> > calls in eapi2 src_compile.
>
> Or make
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:10:44 +
"Daniel Gryniewicz (dang)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dang08/09/30 15:10:44
>
> Modified: package.mask
> Log:
> Remove poppler from mask; current evince works fine
s/current/only/
I currently have pdftex,luatex & xpdf failing here.
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:48:05 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a reminder to everyone that when you migrate to EAPI 2 in order
> to use use dependencies remember to migrate your src_compile function
> too or you will be running econf twice if you have a custom
> src_compile func
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:07:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:36:30 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How should exporting of src_configure in eclasses be handled? Should
> > it be conditional, depending on the EAPI? Or is it O.K. to expor
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:24:20 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:15:46 +0200
> Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An eapi.eclass with such functions and lists of eapi & features
> > maintained there could help thou
> I don't quite see how that deals with an eclass calling econf in its
> exported src_compile? Seems like EAPI versioning for eclasses (with
> implicit 0 only) is more what you're after for that issue (so the PM
> could suppress src_configure if src_compile is going to resolve to an
> EAPI-0 eclas
Hi,
> media-libs/aalib eradicator
added video herd there
> media-libs/liboggzzaheerm
and sound here
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
> (I think pulseaudio is fixed, actually.)
For what it's worth: removing the .la files from pulseaudio breaks its
module loading on freebsd; and it's an elf system. I don't know what
you mean by fixed and I didn't investigate this but restoring the .la
files in the ebuild allowed me to make i
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:18:47 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Andrey Grozin wrote:
>
> > Some time ago, some Gentoo TeX guru (don't remember who) advised to
> > include the following code to the sci-mathematics/maxima ebuild:
>
> > [...code...]
>
> T
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:18:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:33 -0500
> Michael Sterrett wrote:
> > So everybody who emerges gnupg since this change is wasting space
> > for no good reason.
>
> If you care about a couple of hundred kilobytes, relying upon
> individual e
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:06:46 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:39:58 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Then, for the nth time, what would be the good solution?
>
> If you explicitly need compression, do it by hand, since there aren't
> any
> If you really, genuinely think you have a case for compression of
> docs, backed up with statistics showing that it's a relevant change,
I fail to see why you need statistics for something that is clearly a
waste of space, but this could be a start:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_9018
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:36:11 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:28:46 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > If you don't explicitly need compression, don't do anything.
> >
> > ... and mark relevant stuff as "ok to be compressed w
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:53:20 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:43:09 -0700
> Steve Dibb wrote:
> > Plus, I don't really grasp the whole "we have to source the whole
> > ebuild to know the EAPI version" argument. It's one variable, in
> > one line. Can't a simple parser get t
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:19:56 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:13:16 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Which begs the question: is it really worth allowing it?
> > If we only allow constant assignments (which is an implicit
> > restriction in the file
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:16 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:16:54 +0100
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > You're doubling the number of files that have to be read for an
> > > operation that's almost purely i/o bound. On top of that, you're
> > > introducing a whole bunch of dis
I have no strong opinion about this.
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-
> - ignored by current Portage
simple, straightforward but ugly
> b) ..ebuild
> - current Portage does not work with this
this only
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:37:11 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:28:43 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:16 +
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:16:54 +0100
> > > Luca Barbato wrote:
>
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:31:15 +
"Patrick Lauer (patrick)" wrote:
> patrick 09/03/07 13:31:15
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:transcode-1.1.1-r1.ebuild
> Log:
> eapi2ifying 1.1.1. No functional changes.
> (Portage version: 2.2_rc23/cvs/Linux x86_64)
[.
Hi,
> lately i see that in our bugzilla most of the build reports are
> reported with localized build logs which we dont understand. This
> leads to us asking the user to run the emerge once more with LC_ALL=C.
>
> Wont it be nice to have this variable set by default in portage so
> users reporti
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:16:29 +0100
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm creating the amd64 porting of Gentoo/FreeBSD (with multilib
> support).
>
> The problem is that some [1] ebuilds removes
> directly "${D}"/usr/lib/charset.alias and
> not "${D}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/charset.alias.
What about
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:04:52 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:16:29 +0100
> Timothy Redaelli wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm creating the amd64 porting of Gentoo/FreeBSD (with multilib
> > support).
> >
> > The problem is that some [1]
# Merged in dev-texlive/texlive-langmongolian-2008, use that instead
# Masked for removal on 15 June 2009
dev-texlive/texlive-langmanju
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:56:44 +0100
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> Currently preserve_old_lib functions generate two commands per
> preserved lib:
>
> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
> # rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
>
> I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one c
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:00:16 +0100
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> > Also the inter-bug dependencies are often not resolved correctly,
> > that is the to be keyworded package depends on non-keyworded stuff
> > not listed in the bug.
>
> And this is even worse. Please check things with repoman befo
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:54:49 +0100
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> On 09:25 Wed 07 Mar 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:00:16 +0100
> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> > > > Also the inter-bug dependencies are often not resolved
> &g
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:02 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The way how we currently specify the EAPI in ebuilds has some
> problems. For example, there is no sane way to allow usage of features
> of a new bash version in a new EAPI. So we are currently stuck with
> bash 3.2. Also chan
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:04:55 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Err... so what happens if 'new parsing' detects EAPI 4 and 'old
> > parsing' detects EAPI 5?
>
> This cannot happen for a legal ebuild:
> - If the ebuild is EAPI 4, then sourcing it ("old parsing") must
> detect EAPI 4.
the problem he
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 19:31:16 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:17:41 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > In one of them, removal of the old assignment statement had simply
> > been forgotten [1]. For the other two, the EAPI had been assigned by
> > an eclass [2], which we conside
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:41:09 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 07:21 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > The advantage that the eapi function has over a comment is that
> > it's not magic -- it's just normal bash syntax. So we've addressed
> > that issue at a small performance cost (we're reall
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:02:51 +
James Broadhead wrote:
> On 9 March 2012 17:31, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > At any rate, I'm now convinced that we all want GLEP 55, but with a
> > different name.
>
> I think that moving the data to the filename is probably a better
> approach than semi- or re
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:46:40 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 07:39 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:54:03 + (UTC)
> > "Alexis Ballier (aballier)" wrote:
> >
> >> aballier12/03/18 13:54:03
> >>
>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:15:45 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:05:46 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > imho it doesnt hurt anyone to have fine-grained control
> >
> > what could be discussed is to put these into a use expand variable,
> &
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:06:30 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > if we want to make it a use expand, the only thing we need to agree
> > on is the prefix i think: what about fftools ? ffmpegtools ?
> >
>
> Maybe there could be use expand that could be reused by other ebuilds
> too? Such as EXTERNA
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:35:17 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2012-03-20 17:53:56 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:41:39 +0100
> > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >
> > > 2012-03-20 05:29:20 Luca Barbato napisał(a):
> > > > Hi, I tried to avoid
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:57:29 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:35:17 +0100
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
> > 2012-03-20 17:53:56 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:41:39 +0100
> > > Arfrever
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:09:55 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:57:29 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:35:17 +0100
> >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifers
Hi,
Oasis [1] is becoming the de factor standard for ocaml packages. I've
been bored of copy/pasting always the same code from ebuilds to ebuilds
and thus decided to write an eclass simplifying everything.
Attached: said eclass, a diff of a random dev-ml package I've
converted to illustrate and s
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:58:47 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
>
> > DEPEND=">=dev-lang/ocaml-3.12[ocamlopt?]"
> > DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
>
> That looks like a typo.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:11:46 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > oasis_use_enable() {
> > echo "--override $2 `use $1 && echo \"true\" || echo
> > \"false\"`" }
>
> Mike added 'usex' to 'eutils.eclass' recently, so you might like to
> use it: (UNTESTED)
> echo "--override $2 $(usex $
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:02:15 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > > oasis_use_enable() {
> > > > echo "--override $2 `use $1 && echo \"true\" || echo
> > > > \"false\"`" }
> > >
> > > Mike added 'usex' to 'eutils.eclass' recently, so you might like
> > > to use it: (UNTESTED)
> > >
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:41:35 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:11:46 +0300
> > Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >> > oasis_src_configure() {
> >> > ocaml setup.ml -c
eclass version 2.0, i hope i haven't forgotten any comment
I improved some comments/description after a second read also.
oasis.eclass
Description: Binary data
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:44:03 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> eclass version 2.0, i hope i haven't forgotten any comment
>
> I improved some comments/description after a second read also.
since there were no more comments: eclass committed, thanks all
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:00:17 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
>
> You are right. I spoke to ulm about this and the disclaimer can be
> considered separate from the license. Gentoo/FreeBSD will need to
> switch to BSD-2, but aside from that, there is no need for a new
> license.
>
grep shows that a lot
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:34:26 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
> I wrote sys-freebsd/virtio-kmod (bug 410199) while studying
> Gentoo/FreeBSD as part of an attempt to port gptzfsloader to Gentoo
> Linux. naota wrote an improvement that would be useful to send
> upstream. However, the GPL-2 license poses a
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:36:48 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 02:31 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 14-04-2012 a las 14:24 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> >> On 04/14/2012 02:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to
> >>>
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:02:27 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
> and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
> to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring in summary to
> obsolete packag
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:22 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200
> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that
>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
> > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a
> > USE flag for SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
>
> That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:19:04 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:06:45 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400
> > Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert
> > >
> + 07 May 2012; Ben de Groot
> + +files/traverso-0.49.2-desktop.patch,
> +files/traverso-0.49.2-gold.patch,
that patch is not portable, please fix
> + +traverso-0.49.2-r1.ebuild, -traverso-0.49.1.ebuild,
> -traverso-0.49.2.ebuild:
this leaves a stray patch in files, please fix
On Mon, 7 May 2012 21:00:18 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 7 May 2012 20:35, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> + 07 May 2012; Ben de Groot
> >> + +files/traverso-0.49.2-desktop.patch,
> >> +files/traverso-0.49.2-gold.patch,
> >
> > that patch is not portab
Hi,
I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as 'stable'
in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword anything with broken
deps, and its now forbidden. It is the first g/fbsd profile marked as
such.
Consequences for devs: broken deps are not allowed anymore; people are,
lik
Hi,
Time has passed, nobody has been working on it in the past couple
of years and I believe it is now time to make an official announce so
that everyone knows:
The sparc-fbsd arch is dead. People are free to drop the keywords at
will.
It has reached a state that it'll probably be simpler to sta
On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:09 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as
> > 'stable' in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to k
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:29:36 +0300
Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> May be you can share stages and install instructions for this?
>
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415229
:)
(make sure to read the thread linked from this bug report)
On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:58:01 + (UTC)
"Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)" wrote:
> scarabeus12/05/17 13:58:01
>
> Modified: ffmpeg-.ebuild ChangeLog
> Added:ffmpeg-0.10.3-r1.ebuild
> Log:
> Disable postproc in here and use the common library that will be
>
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories
> which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just pixmaps.
>
> proposal attached + diff
>
> This should not break existing ebuilds. Tested a bit and open for
> review now.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:42:11 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> > And users might
> > still have older gobject-introspection installed, with nothing
> > forcing the upgrade now.
>
> Regular maintenance should take care of that. We are not in the
> habit of specifying minimal versions for all dependencie
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:12:04 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:20:23 +0300
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > The 'standard' behaviour (which can be changed by the user) for
> > > Paludis when doing "complete" resolutions is that whenever there's
> > > a slot of something installed
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:48:58 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
> I want to add freebsd_get_cpuarch() to freebsd.eclass. This will give
> us a platform-independent way of generating MACHINE_CPUARCH, which
> will make building FreeBSD components on other platforms (i.e. Linux
> and Prefix) easier.
>
> --- f
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:09:26 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 02:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 02 July 2012 13:37:53 Richard Yao wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2012 10:54 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >>> hu? yes, as already pointed out, uname is not relia
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere,
> > i.e. should each
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:39:38 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > &g
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag,
> and the third was unconditional.
since udev-171 seems to be going stable, why not simply drop the
'extras' compatibility ?
then you could just use 'gudev?' usedeps it seems
A
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:11:42 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything
> currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev.
>
> For packages that install udev rules in ${FILESDIR}, we need an eclass
> that tests the version of udev installed on the u
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:48:08 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > How do you plan to handle the following:
> > - foo installs an udev rule
> > - install foo with old udev
> > - upgrade udev
> >
>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:41:04 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > How do you plan to handle the following:
> > > - foo installs an udev rule
> &
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:50:42 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 07:25 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> > On 07/11/2012 07:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >>> How do you pl
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:02:19 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> --- /usr/portage/eclass/qt4-r2.eclass 2012-04-20
> 07:01:13.0 +0800 +++ qt4-r2.eclass.new2012-07-13
> 19:45:59.259773917 +0800 @@ -19,6 +19,22 @@
>
> export XDG_CONFIG_HOME="${T}"
>
> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: DOCS
> +# @DEF
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:26:58 +0200
Davide Pesavento wrote:
> > [...]
> >> + # backward compatibility for non-array variables
> >> + if [[ -n ${DOCS} ]] && [[ "$(declare -p DOCS 2>/dev/null
> >> 2>&1)" != "declare -a"* ]]; then
> >> + dodoc ${DOCS} || die "dodoc failed"
> >> +
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:21:40 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 01/08/2012 23:42, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Honestly, if some asian person has whatever charset that I often
> > find in spam messages, but is not UTF-8, are you then going to tell
> > that person to switch to UTF-8 to get those py
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:47:24 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Python upstream is doing what they think is best in using unicode.
> >
> > That said, what if we just temporarily set a locale in the ebuild
> > for running tests and elsewhere? Is this unreasonable or
> > impossible? It might not be a gre
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:03:50 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 13.08.2012 19:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> I should mention that we have discussed this already,
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364375
>
> Which was a result of long gentoo-dev ML thread, unfortunately my
>
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 15:45 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Note that pkg_setup is called for binary packages too, which means
> > that DEPEND may not necessarily be installed. In EAPI 4 you can
> > check the MERGE_TYPE variable which
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:45:45 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:45 -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0400
> > Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > > The variables that vala_pkg_setup sets are needed only at build
&g
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:42:10 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:06:06 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Michał Górny posted on Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:01:09 +0200 as excerpted:
> >
> > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:12:53 + (UTC)
> > > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.n
1 - 100 of 944 matches
Mail list logo
