On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:48:08 -0500 William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > How do you plan to handle the following: > > - foo installs an udev rule > > - install foo with old udev > > - upgrade udev > > > > are rules installed by foo used by new udev ? > > No, they wouldn't be; that is a good reason to question the value of > the eclass itself. Maybe the correct way to do this is to forget the > eclass and just file bugs against packages that break having them > move their rules to the new location and set a dependency on the > newer udev. > > This would have to be a rev bump for the broken packages. this sounds heavy for only changing the location of a file, but that's the only sane solution i can think of :( A.
