On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:20:03 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>> Package A goes stable, test suite passes. Package B (a dependency of
>> A) goes stable in a newer version, which will cause A to not merge in
>> stable profile. This happ
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote:
> On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote:
>> Gordon Malm posted
>> 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar
>> 2009 16:17:48 -0700:
>>
>>> There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, AllenJB wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>
>> On 19:06 Wed 11 Mar , Thilo Bangert wrote:
>
> the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via
> IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize
> mor
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors
>> behave with arrows.
>
> It's supposed to say this:
>
>> In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with the discussion about EAPI3 we have now 4 (or 7, depending on how you
> count them ;) ) EAPIs available or almost available. This is getting quite
> confusing.
Be more specific, what actual problems have you encountered?
Wha
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:55:20 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:53:16 +0100
>>
>> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> > Because, as you have noticed before, developers get confused which
>> > eapi has which features available. And ea
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200
>> >
>> > Markos Chandras wr
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 22:26:41 Alec Warner wrote:
>> >> > > Introducing a policy encouraging moving things that definitely
>> >> > > aren't in the least bit likely to be a system dep on a bum
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner
>> wrote:
>> > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd
>>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
>>> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
>>> argument?
>
>> There's a slightly different
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:06:47 +0100
> Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> Considering average post count and Gentoo membership on that list,
>> I'm pretty convinced you're not entitled to decide who is wasting
>> developers' time.
>
> When you've g
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I noticed some eclass commits using java-pkg_func-exists() and it's a
> lot more complicated than it needs to me. Perhaps not everybody knows
> that bash generally gives a return status from functions of the last
> command run in that func
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 08:28:12 +0200
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> - Try to avoid subjective statements. Statements like "C++ feels
>> better" don't add anything to the discussion and are objectively
>> wrong for me, so they have no place in a
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>> No, it's entirely objective. GLEP 55 clearly shows how the filename
>>> based options are objectively better than anything else.
>>
>> But the decision will not be based entirely o
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> it was brought up by ulm that the news item
>> '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it
>> contains a dot.
>
> I stumbled upon this when I experimented with new
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 25-06-2009 22:57:08 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
>> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
>> (eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
>> than elog messages (which, while I have set th
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Steven J
Long wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
>
>> Wow, joke or not, this is the kind of thing that makes me glad I don't do
>> IRC.
> Just to answer this quickly, as I think you're querying my earlier assertion
> that gentoo IRC is a lot of fun?
>
> The real point is that o
Dear god, if you want argue to death do it in private.
-A
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:34:48AM +0100, Steven J Long wrote:
>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> > Steven J Long wrote:
>> >> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > This list is for tech
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
>> The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote.
>> But what about the rest of the year? What happens when the person you
>> voted for sucks? You are mostly powerless to do anything other than be
>>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
>> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> Display-If-In
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:44:07AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> When collecting information on the SYNC variable for my Summer of Code
>> gentoo stats project I'd like to check if the URL in SYNC is publically
>> known or some private/
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Ciaran,
>
> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or
> PMS) in the first place. This essentially leaves you writing documents
> you're requiring for paludis support. As this seems to be mostly a PM
> issue, it s
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've been asked by a user to remove valid SRC_URI for a package that has
> RESTRICT="fetch". The package in question requires you to go to
> upstream's webpage, sign license agreement and then you're fed with
> download link. User
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The way how we currently specify the EAPI in ebuilds has some
> problems. For example, there is no sane way to allow usage of features
> of a new bash version in a new EAPI. So we are currently stuck with
> bash 3.2. Also changes
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>> *** Proposal 1: "Parse the EAPI assignment statement" ***
>>> [...]
>
>> I don't like this idea because the sane way should be
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> I am not a developer yet, but I would like to suggest some idea possibilities:
>
> Minix port of Gentoo
> Illumos port of Gentoo
> LLVM/Clang System Compiler Support
> ICC System Compiler Support (probably easier than LLVM/Clang)
> Port of Gent
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 01:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If they're code, they're code, and we need to execute them somehow.
>>
>>
>> The notion of "execute them somehow" that's used doesn't fit in with
>> the #! interpreter model. You aren
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>> Pragmatic reality, the eapi function actually would work fine. As
>> pointed out elsewhere, bash parses as it goes- which isn't going to
>> change.
>
> Unless the ebuild isn't written
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 13 March 2012 10:14, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, James Broadhead wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure that it's been considered already, but what are the arguments
>>> against embedding the EAPI on a per-package (default) or per-v
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:06 PM, James Broadhead
wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 21:14, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, James Broadhead wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure that it's been considered already, but what are the arguments
>>> against embedding the EAPI on a per-package (default) or pe
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 13 March 2012 11:02, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> The previous council's decision does not prevent this same glep from
>>> going to the council again (decisions are not forever.)
>>> Some folks seem to think that taking glep55 back to the counc
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Christoph Niethammer
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I see. There is more documentation on a per package bases wich has to be
> considered, too. (Found already the metadata.xml files.)
The metadata.xml files are used to generate the use.local.desc file.
>
> As with the pan
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote:
>>
>> On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>>
>>> dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none:
>>>
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9
>>>
>>> t
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:58:47 -0400
>> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> >> > oasis_src_compile() {
>> >> > oasis_s
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:17:56 -0700
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> In general if you are going to say 'this usage is wrong' then you need
>> some kind of tool to detect and report on it; otherwise a subset of
>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 09:54:26PM +0100, Christoph Mende wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for
>> someone to take over a few, most notably:
>>
>> - net-misc/curl
>> - net-dns/c-ares (preferably both t
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>
> I'm guessing it
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Hello, I would appreciate if those of you with portage development experience
> and a moment to spare could please take a look at:
>
> https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygd
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner
>> wrote:
>> > https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch
>
>> Consistency in
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs wrote:
>> /var/cache/repositories/gentoo/*
>> /var/cache/repositories/perl-experimental/*
>> /var/cache/distfiles/*
>> /var/cache/package
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:24:56PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> Fwiw, I've also long despised the layout of the distfiles directory
>> being a flat hierarchy, it makes the directory a festering pit of
>> hellspawn over time on any filesyst
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 29 March 2012 08:21, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 'Support' is the keyword here. The repositories are regenerated given
>> machinesan 'emerge --sync' and can be considered as temporary as the
>> packages themselves are impermanent.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
>> > wrote:
>> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious wha
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> On 03/30/12 14:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> I fail to understand what the license of the ebuild has to do with the
>> license of the package itself.
>
> It has nothing to do with the license of the package. That is completely
> separate. This
2012/4/4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn :
> justin schrieb:
>> iotop cannot be used as user anymore.
>> Any suggestions how to proceed?
>>
>> Leave it to root (Fedora and Suses way)
>> suid it (bad in my view)
>
> I suggest to have a suid USE flag (disabled by default) so the user can
> choose betwee
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> here is what I see on the current udev situation:
>>
>> The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting
>> split out /usr.
>>
>> This, however, was ne
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> Since we've managed to survive up to this point without such a
>> feature, I think it's worth the wait roll it into EAPI 5 and have a
>> clean solution that doesn't rely on package manager in
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 23/08/11 00:20, Vikraman wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics from
>> gentoo
>> machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are
>> welcome.
>>
>> To subm
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Didn't the user already accept the license by putting it in ACCEPT_LICENSE?
>> If not, portage will not download it.
>>
>
> Well, I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a lice
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:28:49AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
>
>> However, my whole point wasn't to throw stones at the chromium team -
>> I think that they've been doing a great job of fixing this problem,
>> and will continue to do so. I jus
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
> 'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
> default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
> w/o ldap auth on desktops than with it.
> So my
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
> right, after all.
> Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including avahi,
> systemd and pulseaudio into a desktop distro so, there is no real
> choice. This
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today.
I'm sure spankman would make them if his tools did it for him, RIGHT SPANK?
-A
>
> On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
>>
>> vapier 12/05/20
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>> Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please.
>>
>> Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works
>> just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but h
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 18:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Actually, Alec's question is not so far-fetched. The Gentoo Social
>> Contract says that Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software
>> unless it is open source.
>>
>
> Though in the cas
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2012 12:54:16 Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:11:44 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> > On 06/15/12 09:32, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > > It is a little confusing when the function reports .a removal when
>> > > no
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> Here is my wishlist for EAPI 5:
>
> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
> Automated epatch_user support
> Parallel make checks
> POSIX Shell compliance
>
> Here are some explanations:
>
> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
> The curren
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:08:55 +0200
>> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> > Also, if I remember correctly, Tommy asked for this some months ago,
>> > you asked for what he sent some days ago
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 11:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:32:34 +0100
>> David Leverton wrote:
>>
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
But in the current form, the spec doesn't allow passing
IUSE_RUNTIME flags to has_version() so we're
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:13:23 +0200
> Justin wrote:
>> Did you read what you wrote and thought about what you request from
>> others? Probably you better should.
>
> Uh huh, and I think we all know there's a huge difference between
> knowin
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:16:42 -0700
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> I don't think the documentation forbids what these developers are
>> doing.
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> As of Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at approximately 10:00 UTC, the manifest
> hashes used on the gentoo-x86 tree will change to "SHA256 SHA512
> WHIRLPOOL". To facilitate this change, developers MUST be using at
> least portage-2.1.10.49 (or portag
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell wrote:
> "epatch" is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not
> implemented as a real helper function.
>
Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you
have to do things like test which version of epatch the package
m
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:40:12 +0100
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:35:58 -0500
>>> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>> > All the arguments for keeping /bin, /sbin, /u
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> AFAIK, neither genkernel nor dracut were expected to get tied to the
>> Gentoo update process. Has that changed?
>
> We don't even update kernels as part of the regular update process,
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
> been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
>
> But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
> a FEATURE for portage to do a
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
> wrote:
>> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix
>>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess n
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:41:17 Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> > i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
>>>
>>> Would be nice having
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> I think part of Mike's point is that time and time again has proven
>> that the way to a mans heart^H^H^H^H to get things fixed is to break
>> them.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> That's all I'm saying. It's being made a whole lot less pleasant that it
>> might be... for what reason? Just to satisfy someone's ego that they're
>> right and can /f
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be expanded in
>>> pkg_* src_* funcs ?
>>
>> Nope. We don't guara
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
>> Uhm. O(n) == O(n/2). Anything assuming they're different is just wrong.
>
> We're basically debating definitions. O notation is used to indicate
> how algorithms scale and nobody use
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote:
>
>>> > from diffball (under current EAPIs)
>>>
>>> > """
>>> > RDEPEND=">=sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4
>>> > >=app-arch/bzip2-1.0.2
>>> > app-arch/xz-utils"
>>> > DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
>>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:23 PM, wbrana wrote:
> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
> "Donate to support our development efforts."
> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
>
You already filed a bug against infra / www asking for this, and we
told you tha
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
> wbrana wrote:
>> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
>> "Donate to support our development efforts."
>> Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
>>
>>
>
>
> My questions are this: Does Gentoo need more money?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> wbrana wrote:
>>>> Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
>>>> "Donate to support our d
tl;dr, barbet crashed overnight. It came back up with what is likely
busted memory and weird issues (segfaults, ICE.)
All services except packages.gentoo.org and bouncer.gentoo.org should
be functional again (we are waiting on an ACL changes for p.g.o.)
According to icinga, the outage was approxim
p.g.o is fixed, but the dns TTL was set to half a day, so it will be
that long before users get the fixed experience.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> All services except packages.gentoo.org and bouncer.gentoo.org should
>> be functiona
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>
>> If you're going to file bugs "in a semi-automated manner", might as
>> well try to assign to the correct maintainer?
>
> How about a policy - no automated bugs may be logged to the
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:35:22AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
>> On 11/18/2012 12:19 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:00:52AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
>> >>> I'm genuinely interested in your goals, in detail, otherwise I would
>>
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 02:05:39AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:29:22PM -0800, Greg KH wrote
>>
>> > But, along those lines, what is the goal of the fork? What are you
>> > trying to attempt to do with a fork of udev th
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:06:30 +0100 as
> excerpted:
>
> It's admittedly a style thing thus pretty much up to the author, purely
> bikeshedding in the original sense of the essay's trivial color choi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Steven J. Long
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 05:16:18PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and
>> letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of
>> simplifying the system.
>
> It's fr
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> pax_kernel is used by 21 packages. The description would generally be
> 'make changes to the package so it works under a pax enabled kernel'.
> Currently it is used to either patch or (inclusive) to pax mark.
>
> What think you?
This seems
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 30/11/12 11:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Richard Yao
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2012 11:08 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 11/28/2012 09:05 AM, Richar
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 30/11/12 12:30 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> How about we not change the docs until someone eagerly implements
>>> all the stuff you just said?
>>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
>> what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security.
>> Users
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
>> policy, get council approval, and write it down.
>> Don't make up silly half-solutions.
>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> I just get annoyed with the "don't use Gentoo unless you like your
>> stuff broken" attitude.
>
> Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very
> different things.
>
> In Gentoo stuff changes every s
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 01:18, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 3 December 2012 03:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2012 6:09 PM, "Rich Freeman" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, hasufell wrote:
>>> > > Only questio
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Ohey,
>
> as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all
> elasticsearch-related packages.
> For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one
> wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On sob, 2017-06-03 at 03:22 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:51:25 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > ...so if a Gentoo package is split into 40 packages in Debian, are you
> > > going to list all of them?
> >
> > If
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge:
> >
> > I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable.
> >
> > I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable)
> > carries with it an
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <
> dilfri...@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:51 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Sandbox
> >
>
> I think I understand, in principle, why a sandbox could be useful, but
> would it not be more productive to follow up with projects w
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, James McMechan
wrote:
> Hello,
> I thought a example of how a overlay sandbox could work was in order.
>
> ###
> # load the overlayfs filesystem for this test
> modprobe overlay
>
> # make the directories for the test
> mkdir -p /var/tmp/upper /var/tmp/work /mnt/g
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> =
> Title: New 17.0 profiles in the Gentoo repository
> Author: Andreas K. Hüttel
> Posted: xxx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0
>
> We have jus
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Alec Warner posted on Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:28:41 -0400 as excerpted:
>
> >> Please consider switching from your current 13.0 profile to the
> >> corresponding 17.0 profile soon after GCC 6.4.0 ha
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 03:37 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> >
> > Sounds kind of weird? If he has keyworded the game package, shouldn't it
> > just never install that version if it depends on an unstable package?
>
> That's right, but if there are two
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> This is something that's been talked about privately a lot lately but it
> seems that nobody went forward to put things into motion. SO here's
> a proposal that aims to improve the condition of our mailing lists
> and solv
201 - 300 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
