# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20 Jul 2007)
# Orphaned configuration files using devfsd.
# Masked for treecleaners. Removed in 60 days.
# Bug 64138.
app-cdr/cdrw-base
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be
> reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need
reconsideration. I agree that user creation
Eric Polino wrote:
If this is truly a problem, then I think the negative USE flags might
be the better solution then. This would allow users the ability to
disable potential insecure features. But really, I doubt security is
an issue here.
The negative (or no*) USE flags are generally consid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 23:11 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>> Mike Doty wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> get this shit off the dev list and somewhere more appropriate.
>> I have a question for in here. Now this is (rightly) going to -project
On 7/20/07, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Polino wrote:
> If this is truly a problem, then I think the negative USE flags might
> be the better solution then. This would allow users the ability to
> disable potential insecure features. But really, I doubt security is
> an issu
Duncan wrote:
> joshua jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:10:35 -0700:
>
>> Honestly..this is not something to get picky over jakub. Upstream was
>> nice and actually came and politely asked us to change the defaults to
>> what most peo
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all ten individually wrong t
fire-eyes wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > OTOH, if enabling those protocols pulls in all sorts of additional
> > packages to support them, shipping with everything on just because
> > it's possible is not the Gentoo way. That's what USE flags are
> > for. If indeed additional dependencies are pulled
Thomas Scharl wrote:
George Prowse schrieb:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:45:46 -0500
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Any user who will see and respond to a question is unrepresentative
of the user base in general.
So if ten users reply then, are all te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> I'd also like to nominate mcummings (he's an old guy in Gentoo land and
> his mails look reasonable), lack (he's a bit fresher, but his mails are
> good) and kumba (old guy, nice mails).
>
> XML has been updated.
>
> Cheers,
> -j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blackace wrote:
> I'd like to nominate:
>
> vapier
> tsunam
> nightmorph
> seemant
> avenj
> christel
>
> Although most of them will probably decline, I think they would do an
> excellent job straightening out Gentoo's heading and have the barnacles
>
It would seem there is a good support for a change to enable all
protocols by default. What will change this issue from a good thread
to an action on the package to implement these ideas?
Another suggestion brought to me by an upstream dev was that Pidgin is
configured to install all protocols b
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> > These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
>> > RW.
>>
> They should
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:20:06 -0400
"Eric Polino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would seem there is a good support for a change to enable all
> protocols by default. What will change this issue from a good thread
> to an action on the package to implement these ideas?
File a bug on bugs.gentoo.
Duncan wrote:
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
RW.
They should
Duncan wrote:
> Is anybody subscribed by mail getting stuff on project yet? If neither
> gmane or gentoo's archives are showing anything...
I've received two mails (I believe that's all) after subscribing sometime
wednesday.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 7/20/07, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:20:06 -0400
"Eric Polino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would seem there is a good support for a change to enable all
> protocols by default. What will change this issue from a good thread
> to an action on the package
Duncan wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
>
>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>>
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce a
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
> heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
--
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200
Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Benedikt
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can
> > be reused by other qmail variants as well.
>
> Okay, I
++
On 7/20/07, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
> heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
--
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux
--
[EMAIL PRO
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
Please stop flooding my inbox.
It is an honest developer question because it was meant to have discussions
between d
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:58:23 +0100:
> Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
> heard from developers...
It's likely some subscriptions are caught in limbo. See my question on
the "Getting
George Prowse wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>
>>> Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
>>> heard from developers...
>>>
>>
>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>
> It is an honest developer question becaus
George Prowse schrieb:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
sure
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
George Prowse wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>
>>> Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
>>> heard from developers...
>>>
>>
>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>
> It is an honest developer question becaus
Dale napsal(a):
> George Prowse wrote:
>> Ned Ludd wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>>
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
>>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>>
>> It is an honest d
Dale wrote:
> George Prowse wrote:
>> Ned Ludd wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>>
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
>>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>>
>> It is an honest devel
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe with
> > callbacks (if possible in bash).
> There is now qmail_mini_install (called by every qmail ebuild) and
> qmail_{full,man,sendmail}_install for the rest of a fu
Dale wrote:
> George Prowse wrote:
>> Ned Ludd wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>>
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
>>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>>
>> It is an honest devel
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 00:02 -0400, Eric Polino wrote:
> > Someone mentioned just killing the USE flags and making them all hard
> > dependencies, however. I really hope that's not done if additional
> > dependencies are involved.
>
> I see your point, but how different would this be to any applic
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
> Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
> a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do things they might not know
they
On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 00:57 +0100, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
> > > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make t
On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 14:40 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Anyway, if nobody objects and nobody beats me to it, I'll add the USE
> flags for the common protocols to package.use in the profiles. Now, the
> real question is what should I enable?
All of the ones that have no major dependencies are
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, some things I think we could/should do are:
> - GWN
> - gentoo-announce
> - gentoo-stats (or whatever we have now, if anything)
Smolt, which is Fedora's new hardware-profiling program, is actively
porting to o
On Friday, 20. July 2007 23:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
> > Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about
> > than a technical one.
>
> One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help
> with is some s
Chris Gianelloni schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Scharl wrote:
Anyways this is more of philosophical/social issue to discuss about than
a technical one.
One thing that I had been considering bringing up and getting help with
is some scripts/whatever to get users to do things
On Friday, 20. July 2007 23:56, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Smolt, which is Fedora's new hardware-profiling program, is actively
> porting to other distributions. We could probably join in the fun
> there pretty easily, since it seems our own stats are on hiatus.
>
> Anyone interested?
Damn, always l
OK. I'm sure this will probably bring upon a ton of responses, but
let's hope they all stay on-topic. I'm not posting this to
gentoo-project since I think it belongs here until this is agreed upon.
So, let's get started:
gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between
devel
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 22:57 +0100, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 14:40 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Anyway, if nobody objects and nobody beats me to it, I'll add the USE
> > flags for the common protocols to package.use in the profiles. Now, the
> > real question is what shoul
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0700
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, some things I think we could/should do are:
> > - GWN
> > - gentoo-announce
> > - gentoo-stats (or whatever we have now, if anything)
>
> Smolt,
On 7/20/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much
anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev or another project-specific
list. Am I correct here? Is
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gentoo-dev-announce: This is the announcement list for
> development-related stuff. Now, there's two ideas for how to run the
> list, that I can think of, but I'm sure there's others.
>
> - Make the list set reply-to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:29:10 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could have sworn genone was working on something stats-related.
He was. I asked him about it a while ago and that's where I got the
"hiatus" bit.
00:30 <@dberkholz> genone__: anything ever happen with the stats app
"Nathan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:53:02 -0700:
> On 7/20/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
>> figured that one out just yet. I know it is sup
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700:
> gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between
> developers, about development and development-related issues that
> directly affect the tree or current proj
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much
anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev or another project-specific
list. Am I correct here? Is this what everyone thinks this l
Jakub Moc wrote:
_ _ _ _ _
| | | |/ ___| | | | |
| | | | | _| |_| | |
| |_| | |_| | _ |_|
\___/ \|_| |_(_)
Stop flooding my mailbox as well with this irrelevant junk finally, it's
totally off-topic here; if you want to complain that noone loves you,
then go to your nanny, I
George Prowse wrote:
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
I would just like to apologise. The reason why so little (e.g. none)
replies to a certain email were recieved was because list does not have
"reply to munging" enabled and therefo
50 matches
Mail list logo
