Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 12:00:57 schrieb William Hubbs:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> > > person to respond to. I
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:01:14AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Well, it sounds totally like motif to me but that doesn't really
> matter :D. Though I'd cut it down to 'netif' unless that's taken.
> Without the 'rc' is more nicely pronounced.
"netif" is taken unfortunately, it's hard to differentia
Dnia 2013-08-07, o godz. 12:00:57
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> > > person to respond to.
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:00:57PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > So, my choices, in no particular order, would be, netifrc, networkrc or,
> > if neither of those fly, keep gentoo-oldnet.
> Robin hasn't responded, so my choice for this is netifrc (network
> interface rc). Someone made a comment ab
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> > person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
> > naming of the packag
Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013, 11:26:16 schrieb William Hubbs:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> > person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
> > naming of the package,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
> naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
> naming ideas.
Rob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/13 09:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> - netrc (conflicts)
>
> Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
>
Or alternatively, rc-net ?
(google seems to reference 'rc' as 'r
On 06/08/2013 00:09, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
> person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
> naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
> naming ideas.
>
> I'm most certainly n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/06/2013 12:09 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Various proposed names (in no specific order):
names, *sigh*
It's rather a interface setup utility than a networking thing.
Networkin happens - most cases - when you have paths and entities and
such
On 08/05/2013 09:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> - netrc (conflicts)
>
> Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
>
Or, duh, networkrc.
On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> - netrc (conflicts)
Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote
> Naming goals:
> - Should describe what it does
> - Does NOT have a name conflict as verified by Google.
> - Does NOT imply OpenRC.
> - Implying Gentoo is fine, as it's where the package comes from.
> - Should drop 'old'
Some sug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/06/2013 12:09 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a
> single person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas
> for the naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a
> w
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:09:54 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> Naming goals:
> - Should describe what it does
> - Does NOT have a name conflict as verified by Google.
> - Does NOT imply OpenRC.
> - Implying Gentoo is fine, as it's where the package comes from.
> - Should drop 'old'
>
> I think
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
naming ideas.
I'm most certainly not planning to get rid of the package whatsoever,
many of
[snip]
> :p I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it. William
replaying to a random message in the tree
Not going to suggest a name but if has to be something for general
consumption, it should avoid the "gentoo" inside the name
just my 0.2¢
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Dou
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs
Am Sonntag, 4. August 2013, 22:37:50 schrieb William Hubbs:
(...)
Dear William,
I think we have come to the point where we all realize that
* any other name is better than oldnet
* there are several possible new names
* and (as frequently) decision by discussion does not really work.
(This is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2013 06:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Since it was pulled out of openrc, the name "netrc" also suggests
>> itself.
>
> 'net run control'?
>
Sounds about right. We can say it's "net run configuration" if that's
better politically.
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dnia 2013-08-04, o godz. 18:01:40
Michael Orlitzky napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/04/2013 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > I thought about gentoo-networking, but that sucks in a way too
> > because i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2013 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I thought about gentoo-networking, but that sucks in a way too
> because it implies that everyone on gentoo should be using it.
>
> ...
>
>> How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more
>
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs
Dnia 2013-08-04, o godz. 15:37:50
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
>
> > How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if
> > the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during
> > previous discussions
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Le
On 4 August 2013 10:38, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> >> OK.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> > Actually the plan is to generalize it so that i
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own na
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init
>> > systems. Right now it is very tightly integ
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init
> > systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there
> > is interest in changing th
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject.
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do
>> we keep the term old? The fun
Hi all,
I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do
> we keep the term old? The functionality of these script is huge, and
> is better than most di
33 matches
Mail list logo
