On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail. > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? > > > > >> best-networking? > > > > > > > > > > > How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if > > > the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during > > > previous discussions). > > > > Hmm, that is a little too cryptic maybe... Is gen "Gentoo? General? > > Generic?" > > > OK. that was the point like mgorny said. To keep Gentoo out of the name > so it is more likely to be picked up by other distros due to it's ease > of use and flexibility. > > Since it is so flexible and handle so many configurations... > > How about Multi-net? ;) (just one more for the fray...)
:p I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
