Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread orbea
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:01:58 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:50 -0700, orbea wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote: > > > > What does this

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-21 Thread orbea
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote: > > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use that so > > please don't remove it. > > It means people will have to sync straight from the upstr

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-21 Thread orbea
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:32:31 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories, > except for gentoo and guru. > > > Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project. > What started as a bunch of shell scripts

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 1/1] autotools.eclass: add slibtool dir for aclocal

2025-03-14 Thread orbea
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:53:34 -0400 Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 3/13/25 12:21 PM, or...@riseup.net wrote: > > From: orbea > > > > When using slibtoolize it needs the /usr/share/slibtool/slibtool.m4 > > file to properly create the configure script. The current metho

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 1/1] autotools.eclass: add slibtool dir for aclocal

2025-03-13 Thread orbea
From: orbea When using slibtoolize it needs the /usr/share/slibtool/slibtool.m4 file to properly create the configure script. The current method of using it is to set AT_SYS_M4DIR in make.conf, while this works for most cases it does not work for app-crypt/tpm2-tss which uses ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-13 Thread orbea
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:40:30 +0100 Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 12/01/2025 13.56, Michał Górny wrote: > > Emit a QA warning suggesting the use of crate tarball, when the > > package in question uses 300 crates or more. Such a long crate > > lists cause ebuilds and Manifests to grow very fast, cau

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting dev-lang/python into per-slot packages, starting with 3.14

2024-10-12 Thread orbea
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:12:56 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > Historically, all versions of CPython were slotted in a single > package, i.e.: > > dev-lang/python:3.N > > This approach has been causing a major annoyance for users -- due to > Portage "greedy" upgrade behavior, any time a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Imminent Python 3.12 switch reminder

2024-05-30 Thread orbea
On Thu, 30 May 2024 17:54:32 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 08:09 -0700, orbea wrote: > > This is a reoccurring theme and its driving away contributors. The > > PR queue really should be taken care of. > > Talk is cheap. > If I had the power to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Imminent Python 3.12 switch reminder

2024-05-30 Thread orbea
This is a reoccurring theme and its driving away contributors. The PR queue really should be taken care of. On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:34:42 +0200 Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 29/05/2024 11.30, Martin Dummer wrote: > > Am 28.05.24 um 08:24 schrieb Michał Górny: > >> If you're up for some more quick

Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo

2024-04-01 Thread orbea
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:01:13 -0400 Kenton Groombridge wrote: > On 24/04/01 08:40AM, orbea wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400 > > Kenton Groombridge wrote: > > > > > On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote: > > > > Eli Schwartz wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo

2024-04-01 Thread orbea
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400 Kenton Groombridge wrote: > On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote: > > Eli Schwartz wrote: > > > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote: > > > > > >> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities, > > >> you could forgive a paranoid person

Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo

2024-03-30 Thread orbea
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:02:25 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +, Eddie Chapman wrote: > > Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm > > saying is wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives > > to choose from? That doesn't have to be d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo

2024-03-29 Thread orbea
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 03:07:13 - "Eddie Chapman" wrote: > Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities, you > could forgive a paranoid person for seriously considering getting rid > entirely of them from their systems, especially since there are > suitable alternatives available

Re: [gentoo-dev] More packages up for grabs due to developer inactivity

2024-02-14 Thread orbea
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:38:49 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages are also left with no maintainer: > > x11-misc/dmenu > x11-misc/slock > x11-terms/yeahconsole > I use these and am willing to maintain them, but I don't think they really need any changes either.

Re: [gentoo-dev] special small-files USE flag without effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]

2024-02-10 Thread orbea
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:56:55 -0500 Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 2/9/24 4:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > This is the part where you try to convince me that the things I want > > are stupid. OK. I don't care. I want it off. Leave me alone :) > > > As evidenced by the removal of libressl and eude

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: add CARGO_TOML_DIR

2024-01-24 Thread orbea
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:43:13 -0800 orbea wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:25 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 06:13 -0800, orbea wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100 > > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: add CARGO_TOML_DIR

2024-01-23 Thread orbea
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:25 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 06:13 -0800, orbea wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 19:32 -0800, orbea wrote: > > > > This is requi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: add CARGO_TOML_DIR

2024-01-23 Thread orbea
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:48:02 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 19:32 -0800, orbea wrote: > > This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a > > Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S} > > > > Signed-off-by: orbea > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: add CARGO_TOML_DIR

2024-01-23 Thread orbea
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:06:35 -0500 Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 1/22/24 10:32 PM, orbea wrote: > > This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a > > Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S} > > > > Signed-off-by: orbea > > --- > >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: add CARGO_TOML_DIR

2024-01-22 Thread orbea
This is required when cargo_live_src_unpack needs to be find a Cargo.toml file in a directory other than ${S} Signed-off-by: orbea --- eclass/cargo.eclass | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/cargo.eclass b/eclass/cargo.eclass index 3bdbb5e3ec64

[gentoo-dev] Should there be an app-alternatives/netcat?

2024-01-16 Thread orbea
Hi, Looking in the ::gentoo repo I noticed there are 3 different /usr/bin/nc options available, net-analyzer/netcat, net-analyzer/openbsd-netcat and net-analyzer/nmap[symlink]. And packages that depend on net-analyzer/netcat must also explicitly list all of the available options where net-analyze

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-build

2024-01-07 Thread orbea
On Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:20:25 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Yuan Liao (Leo3418) wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description: > > > > > > Build

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] last rites (kinda, long masked): sys-apps/opentmpfiles

2023-09-17 Thread orbea
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 13:25:20 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 2023-09-17 15:32:46, Marc Joliet wrote: > > I just want to say how amazed I am that you (and Arsen, too) still > > have the patience to try and explain the realities of the situation > > like this, especially after the eudev thread.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] last rites (kinda, long masked): sys-apps/opentmpfiles

2023-09-17 Thread orbea
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 12:58:00 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Alexe Stefan writes: > > > One is written in shell, the other is written in c.(no problems > > here) > > Not that implementation language matters. > > > One is not part of systemd, the other is. > > Both work fine without system

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > "Eddie Chapman" writes: > > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made > > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it > > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises >

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 19:38:27 +0100 Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 15.09.2023 16:10, orbea пишет: > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 > > Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > > >> "Eddie Chapman" writes: > >> > >>> Not aiming this at you perso

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > "Eddie Chapman" writes: > > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made > > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it > > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises >

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-12 Thread orbea
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:06:32 +0100 "Eddie Chapman" wrote: > orbea wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:23:49 +0300 > > Alexe Stefan wrote: > > > >> All this makes me wonder, what really is the reason for this > >> shitshow. Something tells me sy

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-12 Thread orbea
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:51:34 -0400 Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:35 AM orbea wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:17:00 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > > > Rich Freeman writes: > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-12 Thread orbea
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:23:49 +0300 Alexe Stefan wrote: > All this makes me wonder, what really is the reason for this shitshow. > Something tells me systemd and it's shims will never be without a > maintainer, regardless of how "popular" they are among gentoo folks. > All this seems like intentio

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-12 Thread orbea
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:17:00 +0100 Sam James wrote: > Rich Freeman writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 9:36 AM Eddie Chapman > > wrote: > >> in Gentoo. Have any of these 4 maintainers publicly said > >> (anywhere) that they are not interested in being maintainers > >> anymore (which is fin

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 23:17:09 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:50:13 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > >> orbea writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100 > >> > Sam James

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:50:13 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > >> orbea writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100 > >> > Sam James wr

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:21:21 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > >> Dale writes: > >> > >> > orbea wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:31:30 +0100 Sam James wrote: > Dale writes: > > > orbea wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200 > >> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > >> > >>> Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 CE

Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:40:27 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:21:43 -0400 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:11 PM orbea wrote: > >> > > >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48

Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:21:43 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:11 PM orbea wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > > > orbea writes: > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45

Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100 > > Sam James wrote: > > > >> orbea writes: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Several months ago I made

Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100 Sam James wrote: > orbea writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the > > games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of minimal > > emulators for the command-line

[gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
Hi, Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of minimal emulators for the command-line games-emulation/jgrf frontend with a focus on accuracy. https://bugs.gentoo.org/891201 Upstream is very interested in any portability iss

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
-- Original Message --- > On Monday, September 11th, 2023 at 5:42 PM, orbea > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200 > > "Andreas K. Huettel" dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: > > > > > Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 C

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:29:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Montag, 11. September 2023, 17:22:43 CEST schrieb orbea: > > > Upstream is maintained still. > > > > https://github.com/eudev-project/eudev > > > > No, it's not. > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-11 Thread orbea
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:14:21 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > # Andreas K. Hüttel (2023-09-11) > # Dead project accumulating open bugs and incompatibilities. > # No maintainer commits since February 2021. > # Bugs 673834, 713106, 753134, 667686, 771705, 668880, 770358, 851255, > # 711462, 904

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple packages up for grabs (incl. zsh, feh, zathura, qbittorrent)

2023-08-26 Thread orbea
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:59:59 -0400 Ionen Wolkens wrote: > Noticed that the following packages have been dropped to m-n > back on August 9 2023, but no mail been sent: > > acct-group/maradns > acct-user/duende > acct-user/maradns > app-admin/ryzen_monitor > app-admin/ryzen_smu > app-portage/pkg-t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-12 Thread orbea
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:37:10 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Joonas Niilola > wrote: > > > > > Another big issue is as mjo pointed out, not everyone uses GH. > > > > "Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it > has a bug attachment. Anyo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-11 Thread orbea
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:10:36 +0300 Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even > > includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since > > 2021. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-11 Thread orbea
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:19:29 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 07:07 -0700, orbea wrote: > > > > Why does Gentoo lets PRs indefinitely sit around and collect dust? > > Its extremely discouraging for contributors if their work just gets > > igno

[gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-11 Thread orbea
Hi, Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021. While not trying to be rude before contributing to Gentoo I was involved with Slackbuilds.org for Slackware where everything gets reviewed once a week with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/lightdm-mini-greeter and x11-misc/xautolock

2023-06-21 Thread orbea
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:23:38 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On 2023/06/17 10:12, Hans de Graaff wrote: > > After migrating to Wayland I no longer have a need for these X > > packages. I have already removed myself as maintainer. > > > > x11-misc/xautolock > > > > Has one open bug that sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/targets/desktop: enable USE=vulkan by default

2023-05-22 Thread orbea
On Sun, 21 May 2023 22:48:50 +0100 Sam James wrote: > Ionen pointed this out again today and it made me look back at it; > there's no reason to not have vulkan on by default for desktop > profiles. Its not supported in nouveau yet.

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA PG 0305 (manpages must always be installed) discussion

2023-01-20 Thread orbea
Protecting users from themselves can be a misfeature. Its better to educate and then let them freely choose than to play as their nanny. On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:25:22 +0200 Cedric Sodhi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:33:20AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 13:25 +020

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating virtual/opengl in favor of media-libs/libglvnd

2023-01-18 Thread orbea
I think this is a mistake, libglvnd has a documented performance hit and should be optional. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/glvnd/libglvnd/-/issues/222 On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:23:22 +0200 Cedric Sodhi wrote: > Hello everyone, > > as by our discussion on #gentoo-desktop, we would like to sort ou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we join the which hunt?

2022-05-14 Thread orbea
utable files in the user's $PATH. It should work with posix compatible shell and about as fast as which(1). https://notabug.org/orbea/exists/src/master/exists.sh There are a lot of tests as well. https://notabug.org/orbea/exists/src/master/test.sh