Arsen Arsenović writes:
> Filip Kobierski writes:
>
>> On Monday, March 10th, 2025 at 21:40, Alfredo Tupone
>> wrote:
>>> To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
>>> AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
>>> Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep
Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan
---
profiles/use.desc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/profiles/use.desc b/profiles/use.desc
index 36468b321ddb..6e8329009947 100644
--- a/profiles/use.desc
+++ b/profiles/use.desc
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ dedicated - Add support for dedicated game server
On 14/03/2025 17:23, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:48:50PM +0100, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote:
eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 7 +++
ftr my opinion on this hasn't changed since the beginning, I was hoping
that the idea would be scrapped early rather than more work being put
into
>
> This appears to leave us with sci-ai/* because:
>
> First, 'AI' seems to be the term that is commonly used (just look at
> this mail's subject) and understood.
>
> Secondly, while others may find sci-ai to buzzwordy, that could also
> been seen as an advantage.
This.
Buzzwordy is kinda
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-03-15)
# EAPI=7, uses deprecated Go eclasses. Isn't maintained in Gentoo
# since 2019, with awaiting version bump (upstream is still active).
# Has open security vulnerabilities.
# Removal on 2025-04-14. Bugs #951417, #631076, #679948, #695310,
#771051, #844727, #880151, #9
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:47:42AM +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 10/03/2025 21.40, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> > To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
> > AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
> > Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
>
