On 3/10/25 6:59 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
> W dniu 10.03.2025 o 23:42, Eli Schwartz pisze:
>> I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved
>> concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities
>> relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going to get
>>
On 11/25/24 12:15 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working for a while on pkgcraft[1] and related tooling that
> could have the potential to run various CI checks server-side as a
> pre-receive git hook verifying commits. Previously, this wasn't at all
> possible due to portage/repoma
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:47:42 +0100
Florian Schmaus wrote:
> This appears to leave us with sci-ai/* because:
>
> First, 'AI' seems to be the term that is commonly used (just look at
> this mail's subject) and understood.
>
> Secondly, while others may find sci-ai to buzzwordy, that could also
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:42:49 -0400
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 3/10/25 4:53 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> Although maybe it should be sci-ml.
> >
> > Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
> > ML - "Meta langauge").
> >
> > sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai
Hi all,
no one has responded to my proposal for yet another month so I am
bumping this again.
I still think this is a worthy change.
Kind regards
Filip Kobierski
On Wednesday, February 5th, 2025 at 11:48, Filip Kobierski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as it has been over a month since my initial
On 10/03/2025 21.40, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
Thanks for your proposal.
I would go with sci-ai/*, even if all packages und
