Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/readme.gentoo-r1.eclass | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/readme.gentoo-r1.eclass b/eclass/readme.gentoo-r1.eclass
index e47e1ac20af6..3ad36fac2588 100644
--- a/eclass/readme.gentoo-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclas
Eclass documentation and the elog message indicate that the expected
location to install the file is /usr/share/doc/${PF}/README.gentoo,
not the location of the ebuild's last docinto call.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/readme.gentoo-r1.eclass | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 6:55 AM Ulrich Müller wrote:
>> + ( # subshell to avoid pollution of calling environment
>> + docinto .
>> + dodoc "${T}"/README.gentoo
>> + )
> I believe the current handling "die" i
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> FWIW I am Co-author of the paper that documented these attacks, so in
> case you have any questions I guess I can answer them.
Yes, I have a question: are you going to claim DJB's $500 qmail security
reward?
> > Is this supported? I don
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 6:55 AM Ulrich Müller wrote:
>
> Eclass documentation and the elog message indicate that the expected
> location to install the file is /usr/share/doc/${PF}/README.gentoo,
> not the location of the ebuild's last docinto call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
> ---
> eclas
On 2021-08-16 18:31, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
Feel free to pick up task no. 3 from the bug. Everything else is either done
already or easy enough.
OK, I'll see what I can do.
--
Marecki
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Montag, 16. August 2021 19:06:28 CEST Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote:
> > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
> >> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
> >> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
> >> first.
> >
> > I see. Guess w
On Montag, 16. August 2021 18:53:42 CEST Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
> > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
> > https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
> > first.
> I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
On 2021-08-16 17:50, Joonas Niilola wrote:
It'd help if you described the caveats that are to be expected.
I would say there are two:
1. Apart from from what comes out on the latest even branch (I would
strongly advise against packaging odd branches if you value your sanity,
except possibly
On 2021-08-16 18:06, Joonas Niilola wrote:
What's the rush with 8 anyway? We still have eclasses that don't even
support 7. And since 6 is now, sigh, deprecated, any bump to ebuilds
depending on those eclasses will add to the evergrowing CI issue list
right? I'd say it's more important to secure
On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
>
>> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
>> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
>> first.
>
> I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
> foreseeable futu
On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903.
There's some work to be done first.
I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
foreseeable future, then.
--
MS
OpenPGP_signature
Description: O
On 16.8.2021 14.56, Marek Szuba wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm taking a (hopefully temporary) break from maintaining
> net-libs/nodejs, as I expected when took it on it is a relatively
> high-intensity package and I fear that if I keep it up at this rate I'll
> end up burning out as a Gentoo developer.
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903.
There's some work to be done first.
> On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:43, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
> ---
> eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --gi
A word of explanation seeing as I forgot to use --compose to annotate
the patch itself. Looks like Project KDE has got their hands full with,
well, KDE, therefore here's my take on bumping EAPI support in
cmake.eclass. I am not a maintainer of this eclass so I've only made the
smallest possible
On 8/12/21 1:16 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
case ${EAPI} in
- 7) ;;
+ 7|8) ;;
*) die "EAPI=${EAPI:-0} is not supported" ;;
Nitpick: Add "${ECLASS}: " at the beginning of the die message.
Thanks. Fixed locally.
esac
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
---
eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass/cmake.eclass
index 4bd09459ea6..52bf65a463d 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake.eclass
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
# Maciej Mrozowski
# (u
On 2021-08-16 16:22, Lars Wendler wrote:
thank you very much for wqriting this up. I highly appreciate this.
Cheers!
echo 'app-misc/mc' >> /etc/portage/package.use
I suppose that should be:
echo 'app-misc/mc xdg' >> /etc/portage/package.use
Indeed. Fixed locally.
and have ever
Hi Marek,
thank you very much for wqriting this up. I highly appreciate this.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:15:06 +0100 Marek Szuba wrote:
>Title: >=app-misc/mc-4.8.27 to drop support for ~/.mc
>Author: Marek Szuba
>Posted: 2021-08-19
>Revision: 1
>News-Item-Format: 2.0
>Display-If-Installed: app-misc
Title: >=app-misc/mc-4.8.27 to drop support for ~/.mc
Author: Marek Szuba
Posted: 2021-08-19
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: app-misc/mc
app-misc/mc versions between 4.8.1 and 4.8.26, inclusive, would look
for their user configuration in two possible places:
* if built
Hi all,
I'm taking a (hopefully temporary) break from maintaining
net-libs/nodejs, as I expected when took it on it is a relatively
high-intensity package and I fear that if I keep it up at this rate I'll
end up burning out as a Gentoo developer. Anyone interested in stepping
in? Node has sti
21 matches
Mail list logo
