On Montag, 16. August 2021 19:06:28 CEST Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote: > >> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and > >> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done > >> first. > > > > I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the > > foreseeable future, then. > > What's the rush with 8 anyway? We still have eclasses that don't even > support 7. And since 6 is now, sigh, deprecated, any bump to ebuilds > depending on those eclasses will add to the evergrowing CI issue list > right? I'd say it's more important to secure EAPI-7 support there first. > > -- juippis
I daresay eclasses still missing EAPI-7 support at this point comprise of abandonware. We are at 81% >=EAPI-7 coverage among all ebuilds. cmake.eclass has zero <EAPI-7 consumers and all its deps are ready, so it is only logical to gain EAPI-8 support soon. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
