Tom Wijsman posted on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:18:07 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:27:19 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Throwing hardware at the problem is usable now.
>
> If you have the money; yes, that's an option.
>
> Though I think a lot of people see Lin
On 06/24/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
Does it make sense to have with ebuilds in the tree with unsatisfiable
dependencies? If so, should we distinguish between conditional and
unconditional dependencies? Note that if the dependencies
repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:48:29PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:10:27PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
> > Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> > > - only init is currently handled by eselect-init, which is now using a
> > > very small wrapper POSIX shell script to redirect the calls
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:27:19 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't
> > really a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O isn't a
> > solution to computational complexity; it doesn't deal with the CPU
> > bottl
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I like the idea. It might help bring developers and users closer.
Me too, if I can ever contribute to it, or help users with their Gentoo
(Hardened/SELinux/IMA/EVM/...) through it, I'll be happy to work with it.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeu
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> It depends how you run it. We have teams having a video thing
> open during the day with there geographically-diverse other team
> members and it works well for them. For those teams, it also
> improves cohesion. Geographically-diverse te
Hi!
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> I've worked on a VC system most of last year and I now go
> through regular conferences... it's barely okay from a work
> point of view, it takes lots of time to organize so you don't
> want to do that every single day for sure.
It depends how
Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:24:27 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:33:53 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^)
>
> TL;DR: SSDs help, but they don't solve the underlying problem. =:-(
Well, there's the long-term fix to the underl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/06/13 03:53 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
>> 21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
>>> 2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
>>> gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is
>>>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:14:44AM +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> A VC is a full commitment, and its attractiveness is often much higher
> _before_ you use it..
Agreed.
I have found that if I am on a voice chat with someone, say on skype, it
requires my full attention, especially since I use
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> >>
> >> That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
> >> be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams o
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> And unlike IRC meetings, you can cannot multitask, say making your dinner
> while discussing this or that feature.
Honestly, that bit is a two-edged sword. I was just musing with the
Trustees yesterday how it seems the meetings take fo
On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
>>
>> That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
>> be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers
>> independent of a team. The main goal is to have the teams i
On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers
independent of a team. The main goal is to have the teams introduce
themselves and discuss about different issues in th
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> To be clear, the justification of USE=dmalloc being separated from
> USE=debug is that it is so "intrusive" than anyone excepts a developer
> would find it too cumbersome to attempt to debug a problem with the
> application ?
>
I th
Pavlos, I understand what you mean, I'm just saying that organizing a real
video conference takes its toil. And just opening a webcam and talking is
just going to give an amateurish feeling that could be more detrimental
than not.
Can you please tell us if you have _any_ experience at all with VCi
Le lundi 24 juin 2013 à 12:05 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
> On 24/06/13 11:54, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
>>
>> I do not see the benefit either, it seems like that kind of thing the PR
>> department would come up with, which noone does actually like doing and
>> everyone is glad when it
On 24.06.2013 12:01, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Alex Legler schrieb:
>> On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>>> I realise that by "Gentoo is and will remain Free Software"[0], what
>>> is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
>>> would be a bad e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Legler schrieb:
> On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> I realise that by "Gentoo is and will remain Free Software"[0], what
>> is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
>> would be a bad example to use pr
On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> I realise that by "Gentoo is and will remain Free Software"[0], what
> is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
> would be a bad example to use proprietary software for development or
> communication.
So we shouldn't be
On 24/06/13 11:54, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:54 "Dennis Lan (dlan)"
> >> na
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
> I do not see the benefit either, it seems like that kind of thing the PR
> department would come up with, which noone does actually like doing and
> everyone is glad when it's over and can go back to work.
>
I honestly wonder if Pavlos ever t
25 matches
Mail list logo
