On 24.06.2013 12:01, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Alex Legler schrieb: >> On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote: >>> I realise that by "Gentoo is and will remain Free Software"[0], what >>> is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it >>> would be a bad example to use proprietary software for development or >>> communication. > >> So we shouldn't be present on Google+ at all? > > Last I checked,
…and I check every day! > you can use Google+ with a web browser. For hangouts, you > need to install the proprietary google-talkplugin (I don't think a usable > free replacement exists yet). Sure, but the (web-accessible) platform itself is proprietary as well. I don't see it as much of an issue to use this channel—as long as it isn't the only one we offer. > > Best regards, > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > > -- Alex Legler <a...@gentoo.org> Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
