Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=gui?

2012-04-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:22 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > > > >> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that >

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=gui?

2012-04-16 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:22 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > > > >> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that >

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass history

2012-04-16 Thread Natanael Olaiz
Thanks! On 16 April 2012 12:43, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:37, Natanael Olaiz wrote: > > I want to debug this, because for me (that have to work with this) is a > real > > PITA My question is : where I can see the history of the eclasses? > Some > > time ago all wor

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass history

2012-04-16 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:37, Natanael Olaiz wrote: > I want to debug this, because for me (that have to work with this) is a real > PITA My question is : where I can see the history of the eclasses? Some > time ago all worked perfect! But with the rsync I have no idea what is going > on, I d

[gentoo-dev] eclass history

2012-04-16 Thread Natanael Olaiz
Hi, Since the last updates, every update I have more and more problems with ebuilds that I use from an authenticated https server. For instance: the first time subversion asks to accept the certificate... but since a time ago the subversion fetch eclass function is non interactive at all, so it f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by mduft need a co-maintainer

2012-04-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 11:00 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner escribió: > > On 04/14/2012 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to add to > > metadata if you want. Thanks: > > app-portage/prefix-chain-setup > > sys-apps/prefix-chain-utils >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by mduft need a co-maintainer

2012-04-16 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 04/14/2012 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to add to > metadata if you want. Thanks: > app-portage/prefix-chain-setup > sys-apps/prefix-chain-utils Even if prefix-chaining most likely is broken ATM in prefix-portage, (IMO) they sti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree

2012-04-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would > > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug > > summaries (bugs withou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 23:58 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile? > > Yes. > Just done signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=gui?

2012-04-16 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that profiles. I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making user patches globally available

2012-04-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:19:18 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > What if some patches are applied conditionally? > > imo patches that are applied conditionally should be rewritten so they > can always be applied. > > patches that a

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=gui? (was: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles)

2012-04-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that > > profiles. > > I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way > (to let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") wou