El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200
> Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug
> > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by
> > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug
> > reports).
>
> I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical
> cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full
> atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail.
>
> Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be
> worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have
> more uses than the one you're interested in.
>
>
> jer
>
> I obviously agree, but both suggestions are not mutually exclusive I think :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
