On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:22 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr.""<phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that > >>> profiles. > >> > >> I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way > >> (to let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") would seem frustrating to me. > >> > >> With "wxwidgets" enabled by default people will get the most likely > >> desired result (i.e. GUI) "out of the box", and setting > >> USE="-wxwidgets" will have desired effect. > >> > >> Note that with USE="gtk" really meaning USE="wxwidgets", -wxwidgets > >> would have no effect on such a package, which is the potentially > >> surprising behavior I mentioned earlier. > > > > On the other hand, we should ask ourselves whether the USE flags are > > very intuitive right now. > > > > Say, we have USE=ssl which enables SSL support. We already agreed > > that's the correct meaning of it, and USE=gnutls,openssl,nss are > > just to be used when there's more than one implementation to choose > > from. > > USE=ssl is also meaning OpenSSL and there should be no USE=openssl There could be one if an ebuild wishes to use non-openssl impl by default but allows user to force openssl. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
