David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 25
Aug 2008 21:03:26 +0100:
> On Monday 25 August 2008 20:36:34 Zac Medico wrote:
>> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would
>> >> be eli
On Monday 25 August 2008 20:36:34 Zac Medico wrote:
> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would
> >> be eligible to exhibit the "virtual" property.
>
> I'm inclined toward "virtual" since it's more brief and I think it
> might s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Zac Medico wrote:
| Hello again,
|
| I'd like to get some feedback about what people would like to have
| in the final EAPI 2. In planning for this EAPI bump, we should
| strike a balance somewhere in between everything that we'd like to
| have a
Zac Medico wrote:
>> Then change the name. Call it "zero-install-cost".
>
> I'm inclined toward "virtual" since it's more brief and I think it
> might strike a chord with more people because of their familiarity
> with the "virtual" category and old-style PROVIDE virtuals. We'll
> have to see what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:06:35 -0700
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about,
>>> for instance, kde-base/kde?
>> Looking at the depe
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 02:57:03AM +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-kernel/linux-headers/linux-headers-2.6.26.ebuild
>
> ...
>
> > src_install() {
> > kernel-2_src_install
> > cd "${D}"
> > egrep -r
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:06:35 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about,
> > for instance, kde-base/kde?
>
> Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would
> be eligible to exhibit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about, for
> instance, kde-base/kde?
Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would
be eligible to exhibit the "virtual" property. Perhaps it wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 17/08/2008 в 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
>> At least a few people have expressed a desire to have support for a
>> package.keywords file in the profiles [1] as a means to add or
>> subtract any number values to or from t
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there were some questions about ambiguity in the meaning of
> the proposed PROPERTIES=virtual [1] value, we need to clarify it.
> Just as the "live" property [2] is intended to have a pure and
> simple meaning, so is t
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:01:01 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Kurgan wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700
> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> Since there were some questions about ambiguity in the meaning of
> >> the proposed PROP
В Вск, 17/08/2008 в 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
> At least a few people have expressed a desire to have support for a
> package.keywords file in the profiles [1] as a means to add or
> subtract any number values to or from the KEYWORDS that apply to a
> given ebuild.
It's good feature for overl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Kurgan wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Since there were some questions about ambiguity in the meaning of
>> the p
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Since there were some questions about ambiguity in the meaning of
> the proposed PROPERTIES=virtual [1] value, we need to clarify it.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Eb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:39 Sat 23 Aug , Zac Medico wrote:
>> Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild,
>> will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of "live"
>> source code that may vary each time t
On 13:39 Sat 23 Aug , Zac Medico wrote:
> Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild,
> will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of "live"
> source code that may vary each time that the package is installed.
> The intention is for PROPERTIES=live to hav
16 matches
Mail list logo
