On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:06:35 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about, > > for instance, kde-base/kde? > > Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would > be eligible to exhibit the "virtual" property. Perhaps it wouldn't > be very useful in this particular case, but it doesn't seem like it > would hurt anything either. So, I think it's probably fine to keep > the definition as it is and allow things like kde-base/kde to > exhibit the "virtual" property.
Then change the name. Call it "zero-install-cost". -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
