В Вск, 17/08/2008 в 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico пишет: > At least a few people have expressed a desire to have support for a > package.keywords file in the profiles [1] as a means to add or > subtract any number values to or from the KEYWORDS that apply to a > given ebuild.
It's good feature for overlays, but I think we should avoid this in portage tree as having same information in two places can be avoided in this case: it's better and not so hard to write tool which will keyword packages based on package.keywords file and new keywords could be chosen like GLEP 22 suggests. Or do we really want to start using profiles to force toolchain (e.g. gcc versions) like bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55321#c3 comment suggests? If so than maybe it's better to move keywording information from ebuilds to profiles and than may be there is better solution instead of having one package.keywords file? -- Peter.
