Daniel Drake napsal(a):
> I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side
> (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced, by redirecting users who file bugs
> against it to reproduce with the in-kernel drivers, and then let kernel
> handle the bug resolution. This will remove duplicated maintenance
On 27/03/07, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please could you reassure us that they can co-exist with portage so that one
can be certain that changing to either paludis or pkgcore is not
irriversable?
Pkgcore can exist just fine alongside portage.
--
-Charlie
--
gentoo-dev@gent
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:13 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side
> (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced
No complaints here, FYI never used alsa-driver. I have always compiled
it in, because rarely do I change sound cards in a machine. Or have the
ne
I've been putting this of for a long time, but the planet software was finally
upgraded.
Lemme know if you have any problems with feeds or what not.
http://planet.gentoo.org/
http://planet.gentoo.org/universe/
Thanks,
Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
We have some new ALSA maintainers: beandog, chainsaw, phreak
(and me helping out to start with)
It's of course up to the maintainers to choose how they work, but the
recommendations I have laid down have been that they focus on the
userspace side: utils, tools, firmware, lib.
I have suggest
On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> both of which were discussed at length the
> last time this topic came up...
yeah, i think before anyone tries to start contributing to a dscm thread, they
search the archives and read the extensive discussions that have happened
already
-mike
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:30:56 +1200
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are plenty of ways of doing that, most of which don't involve
> > the huge cost of having to use a horrible version control system...
>
> I wonder if you would be so kind as to expand on the meaning of your
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:38:19 +1200
>
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Care to suggest a different DSCM system?
> > >
> > > Care to suggest why the D part is necessary or even useful? It seems
> > > like a rather extravagant and c
> So far git isn't that bad, I haven't tested monotone that much nor
> mercurial.
>
> Probably we could get some help from upstream if we want to move to it.
I think, the nature of most gentoo repositories isn't distributed
enough. Switching to subversion should be enough to enable distributed
de
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> There are plenty of ways of doing that, most of which don't involve the
> huge cost of having to use a horrible version control system...
>
So far git isn't that bad, I haven't tested monotone that much nor
mercurial.
Probably we could get some help from upstream if w
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:38:19 +1200
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Care to suggest a different DSCM system?
> >
> > Care to suggest why the D part is necessary or even useful? It seems
> > like a rather extravagant and costly solution to solve one small
> > problem...
>
> To d
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:46 +1200
>
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > > > I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would d
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:46 +1200
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > > I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would do what is
> > > wanted.
> >
> > i simply cannot fully ex
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>>> I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would do what is wanted.
>> i simply cannot fully express myself at how terrible monotone is
>
> Care to suggest a different DSCM system?
git?
Lo
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:47:35 -0400
"Stephen Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'd advise everybody to try paludis and pkgcore to see how the
> > > alternatives are faring, I must say that I'm quite surprised by
> > > how fast they are.
> > Please could you reassure us that they can co-exist
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Stuart Longland wrote:
>>> Portage itself, does take a long time to load its libraries. I'm yet to
>>> try Paludis (I'm one of the few MIPS devs that doesn't use it yet), but
>>> do hear good things about it. Perhaps some of
# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Mar 2007)
# Last upstream releases a couple of years ago. Not migrated to
# generation 2 and there are alternatives:
# dev-util/jcvs: dev-util/cvs
# dev-java/j2ssh: dev-java/jsch
# If you need these packages for something, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# and w
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would do what is wanted.
>
> i simply cannot fully express myself at how terrible monotone is
Care to suggest a different DSCM system?
--
CS
--
g
>>> the werent the same question nor were they the same answer
>> They weren't the same, but the second answer was definitely wrong:
So is alternative package manager support something that's considered
important and a priority by the Council?
>>> yes
>>>
Did you not say that finding
* Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/03/26 19:44 -0400]:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> > Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> > stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
>
> actually, i wonder if this would be usefu
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:19:29 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one of Gentoo's priorities is to enable alternative package managers
> to coexist sanely ... it is not one of Gentoo's priorities at this
> time to replace Portage with a different package manager
Do you acknowledge tha
On Tuesday 27 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> >>> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> >>> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Michael Krelin wrote:
> > the werent the same question nor were they the same answer
>
> They weren't the same, but the second answer was definitely wrong:
> > > So is alternative package manager support something that's considered
> > > important and a priority by the Coun
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
Mike,
We can't do a full raw mi
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 10:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >
> > > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> > >
> >
> > Well, we're
On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would do what is wanted.
i simply cannot fully express myself at how terrible monotone is
-mike
pgp426L52RwFu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> > Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> > stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
> actually, i wonder if this would be useful ...
Last rites for dev-java/datavision
Last upstream release was 1.0.0 on November 8, 2005. Recent itext
updates have caused datavision to fail during compile. I personally am
not interested in patching or updating datavision. It's the only package
at the moment that breaks with recent itext updated,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:12:17 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have not implemented any policy at the instruction of anyone.
>
> We have not implemented any policy under the threat of removal of
> services.
I'm pleased to hear that. To be honest I assumed that was exactly wh
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:02:06 +0200
Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering about the FiXmes though. Are they supposed to be
> "fixed" for EAPI=0 or are they references for quirky/weird portage
> behaviors that should be addressed for newer versions of the portage
> spec (and theref
> I'd advise everybody to try paludis and pkgcore to see how the
> alternatives are faring, I must say that I'm quite surprised by how fast
> they are.
Please could you reassure us that they can co-exist with portage so that one
can be certain that changing to either paludis or pkgcore is not
irri
On Dienstag, 27. März 2007, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> I just realized that there not only doesn't seem to be any consensus
> about what the location of /lib/rcscripts should be (as witnessed by
> the location where the following packages install
>
> lib64/rcscripts sys-apps/baselayout-1.13.0_alpha1
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Stuart Longland wrote:
> > Portage itself, does take a long time to load its libraries. I'm yet to
> > try Paludis (I'm one of the few MIPS devs that doesn't use it yet), but
> > do hear good things about it. Perhaps some of the concepts used in
> > Palu
Stuart Longland wrote:
> Portage itself, does take a long time to load its libraries. I'm yet to
> try Paludis (I'm one of the few MIPS devs that doesn't use it yet), but
> do hear good things about it. Perhaps some of the concepts used in
> Paludis could be applied in portage, in order to speed
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> >> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> >> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
> >
> > actually, i wonder if this
George Prowse wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> how about providing me a list of packages that are masked instead of
>> making me read and unmask them one at a time.
> That pretty much defeats the object of them being masked in the first place
>
> So all you can really come up with is speed? If a p
36 matches
Mail list logo
