Tach Chris, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Chris White schrieb:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
> actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy,
> you can put "community" or something if that's all you
[user]
I started using gentoo on dec. 2003. This was my first "big" step after one year SuSE Linux. I was very delight when I
saw, that I was able to build my own system (I always wanted it) with my own requirements and in the way I wanted it to
be built. I was very happy when I didn't saw the
On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:31, Chris White wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo.
penis envy
-mike
pgpD0ckVyufBA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, you
can put "community" or something if that's all you want. All responses off
list please. Thanks.
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer
A+ | MCSE
Mob
Hi guys,
We are planning to add git.eclass as presented in bug #132383 (as
attachment 96300). I also attach it here in case someone wants to
comment parts of it.
Please raise your concerns if you have any.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20B
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 16:42, Simon Stelling wrote:
>> "!> and kdelibs installed on a system at the same time.
>
> This is clear to me. My point was, if there's a specific need to allow to not
> to break arch keywording this way. I'd find it more foolproof and consi
What have we learnt now, Jakub? Keep it in the bug report. ;)
Carsten
pgpxG13G6keIP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:42:11 +0200
Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > One question remains: Is it needed/correct that Portage doesn't
> > take blockers for architecture breakages into account? Such a
> > line/prefix is easily changed and when someone - whatever t
Jakub Moc wrote:
> carlo, you might want to revert it properly, instead of reverting only
> half of the previous commit you've been complaining about here.
Could you please take such stuff where it belongs next time? (To the
bug, that is.) There's really no need to point out such things on -dev,
b
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>> One question remains: Is it needed/correct that Portage doesn't take
>> blockers
>> for architecture breakages into account? Such a line/prefix is easily
>> changed
>> and when someone - whatever the bad reason is - uses cvs commit, a real tree
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: MD5
>
> I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
> Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)
>
> On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> One question remains: Is it needed/correct that Portage doesn't take blockers
> for architecture breakages into account? Such a line/prefix is easily changed
> and when someone - whatever the bad reason is - uses cvs commit, a real tree
> breakage is the cause.
The behav
On Thursday 07 September 2006 13:48, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I wonder how exactly genstef broke mips, 'cos mind you, he just reverted
> to what the ebuild was doing before Bug 114161 was fixed by
> hard-disabling of hspell [1]. Since mips doesn't have hspell keyworded,
> it wasn't affected by that bug b
On Thursday 07 September 2006 13:25, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> I'll try to overlook the reverted changes in kdelibs for bug fixes, the
> improper ${ROOT} injected in my changes where it wasn't supposed to be, the
> broken opengl on kdelibs checks that appeared last month, unhelpful
> comme
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>> The proper forum for crap like this is via taking it up with QA/devrel.
>>
>> Screaming about a change on the ml doesn't accomplish anything more
>> then making you look like a jack ass trying to publically embarass
>> someone you're pissed at; at
On Thursday 07 September 2006 11:11, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> And I'm sure I'm not the only one who has a problem with your
> comment in that bug either. Bugzilla isn't there for flaming other
> devs.
I did not do an ad hominem attack, but have a problem with a single action and
listed my points.
On Thursday 07 September 2006 07:58, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> I am part of the kde herd, thanks.
To my knowledge you have never asked to join the KDE team, nor did I see you
helping tracking down KDE bug reports ever. Just adding yourself doesn't
work.
Carsten
pgp7tjbj1KWLV.pgp
Descri
On Thursday 07 September 2006 04:09, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
I'll try to overlook the reverted changes in kdelibs for bug fixes, the
improper ${ROOT} injected in my changes where it wasn't supposed to be, the
broken opengl on kdelibs
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:37:21PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking
responsibility.
How wonderful this sort of "maintenanc
Alec Warner wrote:
> If you can't work
> it out, you talk to your project lead. If THEY can't work it out, you
> talk to the ombudsman, and so forth. Everyone knows the policy and yet
> no one follows it. I don't want to see this thread continue; you know
> what you have to do.[1]
>
> [1] http:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 11:11 schrieb Stuart Herbert:
> > On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.
Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 11:11 schrieb Stuart Herbert:
> On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626
> >
> > Am I the only one who has a problem with this?
>
>
On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626
Am I the only one who has a problem with this?
No. And I'm sure I'm not the only one who has a problem with your
comment in that
23 matches
Mail list logo
